Canon entries 720
Selected 53
Filtered 53
Page 2/3

argument moves

Loops

Reusable local narrative moves: how evidence is grouped into one argument, tension, reveal, comparison, or decision.

53 entries 24 on this page
L Constraint Flip illustration

Persuasion

Constraint Flip

25-constraint-flip
4 loop ranges

Reframe a limitation as a strategic advantage

4 docs 28 slides/ranges 20% confidence 7.0 pages avg
Structure
The Apparent Constraint -> Why It's Actually an Advantage -> The Opportunity It Creates
Best for
Startup pitches, resource-limited teams, competitive positioning
Observed evidence

Can refranchising be a solution?

India's constraints become leapfrog innovation opportunities

To address the challenge of Q1 being a seasonally trough quarter and highlight the company's natural back-half weighted business.

L Ripple Effect illustration

Causation

Ripple Effect

26-ripple-effect
31 loop ranges

Show how impact spreads from individual to team to organization to market

31 docs 150 slides/ranges 66% confidence 4.8 pages avg
Structure
Individual Impact -> Team Impact -> Organizational Impact -> Market/Industry Impact
Best for
Change management, scaling initiatives, demonstrating broad value
Observed evidence

Scale the French finding to a European pattern

Show benefits ripple beyond financials and translate into ownership actions

Show social impact rippling from customers to communities to entrepreneurs

L Cost Of Inaction illustration

Urgency

Cost Of Inaction

27-cost-of-inaction
6,338 loop ranges

Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing

6,329 docs 31,900 slides/ranges 2% confidence 5.0 pages avg
Structure
The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point
Best for
Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation
Observed evidence

Highlighting the cost of inaction in not disrupting the retail market

Highlight impact of talent shortage on IT spending

Highlight the cost of not addressing the current home insurance problems

L Ladder Abstraction illustration

Explanation

Ladder Abstraction

28-ladder-abstraction
17 loop ranges

Move between concrete examples and abstract principles to make ideas stick

17 docs 82 slides/ranges 9% confidence 4.8 pages avg
Structure
The Concrete Example -> The Pattern It Represents -> The Universal Principle -> Back to Specific Application
Best for
Training, thought leadership, making complex ideas accessible
Observed evidence

Understand the analogy of Vitable Health

What are the characteristics of Norwegian crypto owners?

Presenting AgroFresh's solutions as a ladder for abstraction

L Trojan Horse illustration

Persuasion

Trojan Horse

29-trojan-horse
3 loop ranges

Lead with something they already want, then reveal the bigger opportunity inside

3 docs 13 slides/ranges 63% confidence 4.3 pages avg
Structure
The Obvious Win (What They Want) -> The Hidden Opportunity -> The Bigger Vision
Best for
Upselling, expanding scope, introducing new initiatives
Observed evidence

Hero products under-distributed

Reveal partnerships and revenue streams

How can Zolunicant be a Trojan horse for addressing opioid use disorder?

L 2x2 Matrix illustration

Consulting Framework

2x2 Matrix

30-2x2-matrix
60 loop ranges

Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant

56 docs 197 slides/ranges 65% confidence 3.3 pages avg
Structure
Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot
Best for
Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning
Observed evidence

Introduce the Cyber Quadrant framework that defines the 4 archetypes

To show how Shelfleet's solution benefits independent brands

Position banks on credit vs deposit growth

L Waterfall Value illustration

Consulting Framework

Waterfall Value

31-waterfall-value
50 loop ranges

Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost

42 docs 271 slides/ranges 74% confidence 5.4 pages avg
Structure
The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder
Best for
Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations
Observed evidence

Quantify GenAI value at 500-800bps via P&L bridge

Build sum-of-parts EBITDA -> equity value upside

How do precedent transactions and valuation methodologies support the proposed transaction?

L Funnel Analysis illustration

Consulting Framework

Funnel Analysis

32-funnel-analysis
17 loop ranges

Show progressive filtering through stages to identify where drop-off occurs

17 docs 89 slides/ranges 67% confidence 5.2 pages avg
Structure
Top of Funnel -> Stage 1 Conversion -> Stage 2 Conversion -> Bottom of Funnel -> The Leak
Best for
Sales optimization, customer journey, process efficiency
Observed evidence

Prove pillar 1 'Path to Advice' is converting at every funnel stage with runway ahead

narrow from all countries to the few on track

Walk financing funnel from sources used → applications made → loan outcome → barriers

L Build Up illustration

Consulting Framework

Build Up

33-build-up
112 loop ranges

Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total

88 docs 715 slides/ranges 73% confidence 6.4 pages avg
Structure
The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total
Best for
Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing
Observed evidence

Stack up product platform components

Build incremental value of first-party Microsoft agents

Build up Issuing Solutions baseline and portfolio components

L Segmentation Split illustration

Consulting Framework

Segmentation Split

34-segmentation-split
203 loop ranges

Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns

165 docs 1,221 slides/ranges 79% confidence 6.0 pages avg
Structure
The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference
Best for
Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation
Observed evidence

Decompose 2024 performance into three operating segments

Break the aggregate Asia-Pacific view into country-specific dynamics

Split older vs younger gens to argue parallel strategies

L Scenario Fork illustration

Consulting Framework

Scenario Fork

35-scenario-fork
43 loop ranges

Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions

40 docs 220 slides/ranges 81% confidence 5.1 pages avg
Structure
The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation
Best for
Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations
Observed evidence

Fork recommendations by audience: incumbents vs. challengers

Frame the FY25 outlook against headwinds, tailwinds and fuel sensitivity

Force the audience to choose what kind of disruption AI is

L Maturity Curve illustration

Consulting Framework

Maturity Curve

36-maturity-curve
145 loop ranges

Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level

143 docs 624 slides/ranges 38% confidence 4.3 pages avg
Structure
Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap
Best for
Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking
Observed evidence

Show org-model maturity progression and where focus must go

Introduce the 4-level operations maturity model and 4 levers

Growth drivers

L Root Cause Tree illustration

Consulting Framework

Root Cause Tree

37-root-cause-tree
17 loop ranges

Branch out from a problem to its multiple contributing causes

16 docs 74 slides/ranges 80% confidence 4.4 pages avg
Structure
The Problem -> Branch 1 (Cause A) -> Branch 2 (Cause B) -> Branch 3 (Cause C) -> The Primary Root
Best for
Problem diagnosis, quality issues, operational failures
Observed evidence

Diagnose drivers of the disconnect: budget, talent, market readiness

Diagnose the multiple causes feeding the skills gap

Surface the root barriers blocking transformation

L Tradeoff Triangle illustration

Decision Making

Tradeoff Triangle

38-tradeoff-triangle
3 loop ranges

Show that you can only optimize for 2 of 3 competing priorities

3 docs 12 slides/ranges 79% confidence 4.0 pages avg
Structure
Priority A vs Priority B vs Priority C -> What We're Optimizing For -> What We're Sacrificing -> Why This Trade-Off
Best for
Resource allocation, strategic choices, expectation setting
Observed evidence

Surface AI/data tradeoffs — efficiency vs privacy/governance risk

Force explicit trade-off choices and crystallize CEO agenda

Frame buy vs build vs partner trade-off for sourcing

L Benchmark Gap illustration

Comparison

Benchmark Gap

39-benchmark-gap
357 loop ranges

Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity

342 docs 1,368 slides/ranges 32% confidence 3.8 pages avg
Structure
Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity
Best for
Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting
Observed evidence

Benchmark India macro gaps vs peers

How does St. Jude Medical's security compare to industry standards?

To highlight the benchmark gap and provide benchmarking data

L Mece Breakdown illustration

Consulting Framework

Mece Breakdown

40-mece-breakdown
655 loop ranges

Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories

632 docs 4,078 slides/ranges 24% confidence 6.2 pages avg
Structure
The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage
Best for
Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis
Observed evidence

To understand the bank's strategic priorities and investments

Map governance & risk apparatus

Analyze comparable companies and precedent transactions

L So What Cascade illustration

Consulting Framework

So What Cascade

41-so-what-cascade
473 loop ranges

Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion

412 docs 2,590 slides/ranges 41% confidence 5.5 pages avg
Structure
The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)
Best for
Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations
Observed evidence

What do the financial metrics mean for the company's future performance?

Cascade Q3 data bullets into the strategic so-what (Accelerate)

Translate industrial barriers into prescriptive policy recommendations

L Hypothesis Test illustration

Consulting Framework

Hypothesis Test

42-hypothesis-test
241 loop ranges

State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence

241 docs 1,665 slides/ranges 6% confidence 6.9 pages avg
Structure
The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)
Best for
Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations
Observed evidence

To test the hypothesis that Affirm's platform is performing well

To test the hypothesis of the proposed integration

How will this acquisition drive growth?

L Issue Tree illustration

Consulting Framework

Issue Tree

43-issue-tree
13 loop ranges

Break a key question into sub-questions until you reach answerable, actionable pieces

11 docs 82 slides/ranges 81% confidence 6.3 pages avg
Structure
The Key Question -> Sub-Question A -> Sub-Question B -> Sub-Question C -> Synthesized Answer
Best for
Problem structuring, project scoping, complex analysis
Observed evidence

Synthesize characteristics and structure 5 driving questions

Decompose the constraint question into three sub-questions and synthesize answer

Decompose the platform-adoption decision into three sequential sub-questions with answers

L Value Chain Walk illustration

Consulting Framework

Value Chain Walk

44-value-chain-walk
30 loop ranges

Walk through each step of the value chain to identify where value is created or destroyed

20 docs 130 slides/ranges 77% confidence 4.3 pages avg
Structure
Input -> Process Step 1 -> Process Step 2 -> Process Step 3 -> Output -> Value Assessment
Best for
Operations improvement, cost reduction, competitive advantage
Observed evidence

Walk the natural-gas value chain to surface segment-specific plays

Walk EV value chain to identify opportunity nodes

Walk transportation value chain to map opportunities

L Stakeholder Map illustration

Change Management

Stakeholder Map

45-stakeholder-map
14 loop ranges

Identify key players, their interests, and how to navigate them

14 docs 54 slides/ranges 78% confidence 3.9 pages avg
Structure
The Decision -> Key Stakeholders -> Their Interests/Concerns -> The Alignment Strategy
Best for
Change management, political navigation, implementation planning
Observed evidence

Map benefits across each stakeholder + pathway to adoption

Map ecosystem participants, their traits, and roles

Define how BCG, Concept Consulting and sector participants will collaborate

L Risk Reward Plot illustration

Decision Making

Risk Reward Plot

46-risk-reward-plot
1 loop ranges

Evaluate options by plotting risk against potential reward

1 docs 3 slides/ranges 84% confidence 3.0 pages avg
Structure
The Options -> Risk Assessment -> Reward Assessment -> The Optimal Choice
Best for
Investment decisions, project prioritization, strategic bets
Observed evidence

Compare options on risk vs reward across short and long term to pick Option III

L Quick Win Big Bet illustration

Consulting Framework

Quick Win Big Bet

47-quick-win-big-bet
2,104 loop ranges

Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets

2,101 docs 9,718 slides/ranges 3% confidence 4.6 pages avg
Structure
The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap
Best for
Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation
Observed evidence

Sequence three recommended moves toward maximum value

How can Talkspace drive revenue growth and improve user engagement?

Highlight multiple avenues to achieve outsized growth.

L Capability Gap illustration

Consulting Framework

Capability Gap

48-capability-gap
20 loop ranges

Compare required capabilities vs. current capabilities to define the build/buy/partner decision

20 docs 69 slides/ranges 80% confidence 3.5 pages avg
Structure
Required Capabilities -> Current State -> The Gap -> Build vs Buy vs Partner Decision
Best for
M&A strategy, digital transformation, organizational design
Observed evidence

Show board-tech-quotient gap and prescribe build-up

Diagnose the capability gap a target must close to be public-ready

Frame MarTech investment and AI engine stack as capability gap to close