L.E.K. · consulting-deck
International Comparison of Australia’s Freight and Supply Chain Performance 2019
178 pages · 4 arc beats · 2 loops
International Comparison of Australia’s Freight and Supply Chain Performance 2019
L.E.K. arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
1102030405060708090100110120130140150160170178
Deck intelligence map
4 coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 30 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Situation & Context 5 slides 100% 5/5 slides 100% 5/5 slides · 32 hits — 0/5 slides
80% 4/5 slides — 0/5 slides
100% 5/5 slides — 0/5 slides
Problem & Complication 7 slides 100% 7/7 slides 100% 7/7 slides · 42 hits 57.1% 4/7 slides 57.1% 4/7 slides 71.4% 5/7 slides 100% 7/7 slides — 0/7 slides
Evidence & Proof 8 slides 100% 8/8 slides 100% 8/8 slides · 49 hits 62.5% 5/8 slides 12.5% 1/8 slides 12.5% 1/8 slides 100% 8/8 slides — 0/8 slides
Solution & Approach 10 slides 100% 10/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides · 54 hits 20% 2/10 slides 30% 3/10 slides 40% 4/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides — 0/10 slides
Slide inventory
178 every slide · same image gating as the playbook
05
The slide uses a bar chart to show productivity trends and a numbered list to outline strategic action plans.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
06
The slide uses a process flow diagram to segment the supply chain into 8 numbered steps, with red dashed boxes highlighting the 'materials management' scope.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
07
Uses a legend for 'Adherence to selection criteria' (Low vs High).compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
08
Uses a value chain framework to define scope for two distinct industries.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
09
The slide uses two distinct data tables to justify the selection of peer regions for benchmarking.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
10
The slide uses bar charts to compare Australia against the U.S., Norway, Denmark, and the UK.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
11
The chart uses a stacked bar format to distinguish between recycling rates and waste-to-energy rates.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
12
L.E.K. consulting slide. Compares cost per ton per km for compacted vs uncompacted waste across four regions.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
13
The slide contains a duplicate bullet point regarding waste exports.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
14
Includes a stacked bar chart and a supporting data table with key operational metrics.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
15
Includes callout regarding landfill diversion issues in NSW.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
16
The slide uses a comparative approach to frame the problem of waste management in Australia against international benchmarks.cite_precedent
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
17
Includes a waterfall chart for cost composition and stacked bar charts for market segmentation.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
19
The slide uses a series of bar charts and summary tables to compare cost metrics per 9LE (9-liter equivalent) and logistics data.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
20
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast supply chain efficiency with the policy/infrastructure landscape.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
21
The slide includes visual references to other slides in the deck (benchmarking tables, value driver trees, and case study summaries).present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
22
The slide uses a funnel diagram to represent the prioritization process.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
23
The table uses pie-chart-like icons to represent qualitative levels of economic impact and freight component.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
25
The chart highlights a 'Period of productivity stagnation' starting from 1998.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
26
The slide highlights the fourth priority of the National Freight Strategy, which is 'Better freight location and performance data'.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
27
The slide uses a numbered process flow to delineate supply chain stages, with red dashed boxes highlighting the 'materials management' scope.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
28
The slide uses a qualitative scoring system (pie charts) to indicate adherence to selection criteria.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
30
Includes logos of government bodies and private waste management companies.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
31
The slide uses a column-based layout to define the waste management ecosystem.decompose_segments
32
The slide uses a bar chart to compare international waste generation and a stacked bar chart to show the composition of Australian waste over time.analyze_data
33
The slide uses three line charts to correlate waste diversion improvements with rising landfill levies across different Australian states.analyze_data
34
Includes CAGR data for historical periods and a forward-looking projection based on export bans.quantify_impact
35
Includes map of Australia showing waste transport routes and news clipping regarding China's waste import ban.establish_context
36
The slide uses a series of stacked bar charts to decompose waste by region, type, material, and management type.establish_context
37
The slide uses arrows to indicate volume flow and color-coded dots for facility types.establish_context
38
The chart compares two different categorizations of waste collection systems (one by population, one by bin system type).establish_context
39
The slide uses a value chain/process flow structure to map waste management logistics.present_framework
40
Includes data table below the bar chart and a comparison table for waste services.establish_context
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
42
The slide uses a vertical arrow to imply a hierarchy or relative priority of categories.present_framework
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
43
The table includes data for Australia, U.S., Denmark, UK, Canada, Germany, and Norway, broken down by specific regions or cities.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
44
The table highlights Wales and Denmark with a red dashed box to indicate their selection as primary comparators.compare_options
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
47
The slide uses callouts to annotate specific policy and infrastructure milestones on the diversion rate chart.analyze_data
48
The slide illustrates a process flow for waste management data reporting.present_framework
50
Includes specific data on A-R-C facility operations and waste management logistics.establish_context
53
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to connect the central 'Proposed efficiency and efficacy metrics' to the three categories.present_framework
54
The slide uses a vertical grouping structure to categorize metrics into 'Quality' and 'Cost'.present_framework
55
The slide uses a legend where filled circles indicate data collected and empty circles indicate data unavailable, with some partial fills.analyze_data
56
The table uses a visual legend (filled vs. empty circles) to indicate data availability for specific metrics.analyze_data
57
The chart uses a stacked bar format to show composition of waste, with a data table below for context.compare_peers
58
The chart uses a stacked bar format to distinguish between recycling rates and waste-to-energy rates.compare_peers
61
Includes callout explaining the outlier in Sydney garbage transportation distance due to the Woodlawn Bioreactor.quantify_impact
62
The slide uses bar charts to quantify handling nodes and waste volume percentages, alongside process flow diagrams to illustrate logistics models.compare_options
63
The chart shows that trucks are the dominant mode of transport for household waste in all four regions, with rail usage being minimal or non-existent.compare_peers
64
The slide uses a series of four bar charts to compare operational efficiency metrics.compare_peers
66
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to break down costs per tonne, supplemented by a data table for key metrics and callouts explaining cost components.analyze_data
67
The chart uses a stacked bar format to break down costs, with a specific focus on transport costs (highlighted with a red dashed border).compare_peers
68
Includes a stacked bar chart with callouts explaining cost variances and a supporting data table for distance and volume.compare_options
69
D1 tag present; L.E.K. branding; includes detailed footnotes on currency conversion and data limitations.compare_options
71
The table uses a heatmap-style color coding to indicate relative performance against Australian benchmarks.compare_peers
72
The slide uses a heatmap to show relative performance against Australia, where orange indicates disadvantaged and green indicates advantaged.compare_peers
74
The slide uses a sequential process flow to outline the research methodology.present_framework
75
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to compare budget allocations, with waste management highlighted in a darker grey.establish_context
76
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to compare three categories of state-level entities.present_framework
77
The slide uses a combination of a grouped bar chart and a summary table to illustrate the financial gap in waste management funding.quantify_impact
78
The slide uses a list-based structure to map government entities to their specific policy contributions.establish_context
80
Uses a custom matrix to map policy/infrastructure against supply chain stages; includes a legend for relative cost impact.diagnose
81
The slide uses a pie-chart-like icon system to represent relative impact levels (low to high).analyze_data
82
The slide uses a comparative table structure to contrast regulatory frameworks.compare_options
83
The slide uses pie-chart-like icons to represent qualitative impact levels (low, medium, high).compare_options
84
The slide uses circular icons to represent qualitative impact levels (likely low, medium, high).compare_options
85
The table uses a visual gauge system (circles with varying fill levels) to represent impact levels.compare_options
88
The slide uses a visual legend to represent impact levels (full circle, half circle, empty circle) and initiative types (color-coded rows).prioritize
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
89
The slide uses a structured table format to map specific issues to potential solutions and their expected impact levels.compare_options
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
90
The slide uses a structured table format to map problems to solutions, with qualitative impact indicators.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
91
The slide uses a structured table format to map issues to potential solutions and their expected impact levels.present_solution
92
The slide uses a qualitative impact matrix (circles) to denote the degree of impact on freight efficiency vs environmental outcomes.present_solution
93
The slide uses a structured table format to map issues to opportunities, with qualitative impact indicators.present_solution
94
The slide uses a structured table format to map specific waste management problems to potential policy or operational interventions.prioritize
95
The slide uses a structured table format to map issues to opportunities and assess their impact on freight efficiency vs environmental outcomes.prioritize
96
The slide uses a structured table format to map issues to opportunities, with qualitative impact indicators.present_solution
97
The slide uses a structured table format to map specific issues to potential opportunities.prioritize
98
The slide uses a structured table format to present strategic recommendations for future research.recommend
100
Includes revenue data from 2013 to 2023F and key economic drivers.establish_context
101
The slide uses a combination of a bar chart for historical production and a series of stacked bar charts to decompose the 2018 market structure.analyze_data
102
The slide highlights South Australia as the dominant region and identifies the cross-border Murray Darling-Swan Hill region as a significant contributor.analyze_data
103
The diagram distinguishes between inbound and outbound logistics and highlights internal movements that are out of focus for the study.present_framework
104
The chart uses a waterfall structure to decompose the retail price into its constituent margins and costs.quantify_impact
105
Includes callouts with specific freight percentages and logistics details.establish_context
107
The slide uses a vertical arrow to imply a hierarchy or process flow of selection criteria.present_framework
111
The chart uses a stacked bar format to show the split between domestic and export volumes over time.analyze_data
112
The slide uses a color-coded map linked to a table of districts. A red dashed box highlights districts 11-13, which account for the majority of the volume.analyze_data
113
Includes a stacked bar chart for market share and a table for top producers, alongside an infographic of regulatory bodies.establish_context
114
Includes a legend for bulk vs bottled transport and key wine counties.establish_context
116
The chart uses a stacked bar for 18E to distinguish Bordeaux from other regions.analyze_data
117
The slide uses a vertical process flow to show the hierarchy from Wineries to Export/Domestic markets.present_framework
120
The central diagram is a circular process flow connecting the three metric categories.present_framework
121
The slide is part 1 of a 2-part series. It uses a simple table structure to define operational metrics.summarize
122
This is the second part of a two-part series of slides listing 21 metrics.summarize
123
The table uses circles to indicate data availability, though all circles are empty in this view. 9LE stands for 9 litres.analyze_data
124
The slide uses a value-chain style process flow to map out the supply chain stages.present_framework
125
Includes callouts explaining logistics challenges and cost structures.compare_peers
126
The slide uses bar charts to contrast production scale and cost efficiency between regions.compare_peers
128
The slide uses two charts to contrast logistics profiles of three wine regions.analyze_data
129
The slide uses two grouped bar charts paired with data tables to compare freight costs across three regions.analyze_data
130
The slide uses a combination of bar charts and data tables to contrast export characteristics.compare_peers
131
Includes callouts explaining specific logistics constraints for South Australia and Bordeaux.analyze_data
132
The slide uses a dual-chart layout to compare non-temperature controlled vs temperature controlled freight costs, supported by data tables for total costs and acompare_peers
133
The chart compares freight costs per 9LE (9-liter equivalent) for bottled and bulk wine across 10 specific routes.analyze_data
134
The slide uses a series of empty bar charts to visually represent the lack of data for most metrics.diagnose
135
The chart uses a stacked bar format to break down logistics costs, supplemented by a data table for distance and volume metrics.compare_peers
136
Includes data tables below each chart showing average distance and total volume freighted.compare_peers
137
The slide uses a heatmap-style color gradient to indicate relative performance, with orange representing 'less superior' and green representing 'more superior'.compare_peers
138
The slide uses a bulleted list structure to compare logistics and supply chain costs across three major wine-producing regions.compare_peers
141
The slide uses a map-based flow diagram to categorize tax types by trade direction (import, domestic, export).establish_context
142
The slide details the structure of three distinct levies, showing how they are calculated and where the funds are directed.analyze_data
143
Includes a stacked bar chart comparing cash received vs. cash used for FY2017.summarize
145
The slide uses a custom matrix to visualize regulatory touchpoints and impact levels.diagnose
146
The table uses a visual legend to indicate relative impact levels (low vs high).analyze_data
147
The table uses qualitative indicators (circles) to represent impact levels.compare_peers
152
The slide uses a structured table format to map specific issues to examples and opportunities, with a qualitative impact indicator.diagnose
153
The slide uses a structured table format to present diagnostic findings. The 'Impact on freight efficiency' column uses pie charts as qualitative indicators.diagnose
154
The slide uses a structured table format to map issues to opportunities, with a qualitative 'Impact on freight efficiency' indicator column.diagnose
156
The chart shows the breakdown of domestic goods moved by mode (Rail, Road, Coastal shipping, Air) for FY2015-16.diagnose
157
The slide outlines a structured research and analytical process.present_framework
158
The slide uses a funnel diagram to represent a filtering or prioritization process.prioritize
159
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast the two considerations, each supported by a data table example.present_framework
160
The slide uses a process flow structure to illustrate the three steps of a preliminary review.plan_implementation
161
The slide uses a structured list format to explain the application of value driver trees in supply chain analysis.present_framework
162
The slide uses two distinct diagrams: a value driver tree for freight costs and a process flow for waste journey patterns.present_framework
163
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to categorize supply chain metrics.present_framework
164
The slide uses a 3x3 matrix structure to categorize considerations for international benchmarking.present_framework
165
The slide outlines a standard data processing workflow for consulting engagements.present_framework
167
The slide uses a 3-column comparison framework to evaluate research methodologies.present_framework
168
The slide uses a flow-like structure showing two inputs (analysis charts) feeding into a central synthesis table, which then leads to a list of action plans.transition
169
The slide uses a numbered list format (7) suggesting it is part of a larger methodological sequence.summarize
172
The slide uses a two-column layout: left side lists product categories, right side illustrates supply chain flow diagrams for five archetypes (A-E).present_framework
173
The slide uses a funnel diagram to illustrate a filtering process.present_framework
174
The table uses a heatmap-style color gradient to indicate suitability, with yellow representing 'least suitable' and green representing 'most suitable'.analyze_data
175
The table uses visual indicators (pie charts) to represent economic impact and freight component levels.prioritize
176
The 'Potential freight impact' column uses pie-chart-like icons to represent relative magnitude.analyze_data
178
This is an acknowledgement slide listing various Australian government departments and industry bodies.other