Deloitte · consulting-deck
New Brunswick Supply Chain Study
70 pages · 4 arc beats · 0 loops
New Brunswick Supply Chain Study
Deloitte arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 0 LOOPS
1510152025303540455055606570
Deck intelligence map
4 coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 20 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Situation & Context 5 slides 100% 5/5 slides 100% 5/5 slides · 37 hits — 0/5 slides
— 0/5 slides
20% 1/5 slides 100% 5/5 slides — 0/5 slides
Problem & Complication 4 slides 100% 4/4 slides 100% 4/4 slides · 31 hits 25% 1/4 slides 25% 1/4 slides 100% 4/4 slides 100% 4/4 slides — 0/4 slides
Evidence & Proof 5 slides 100% 5/5 slides 100% 5/5 slides · 39 hits 60% 3/5 slides 40% 2/5 slides 20% 1/5 slides 100% 5/5 slides — 0/5 slides
Impact & Next Steps 6 slides 100% 6/6 slides 100% 6/6 slides · 32 hits — 0/6 slides
16.7% 1/6 slides 33.3% 2/6 slides 100% 6/6 slides — 0/6 slides
Slide inventory
70 every slide · same image gating as the playbook
04
The slide outlines the strategic partnership between NB Power and ARC Clean Technology, focusing on localizing the supply chain for SMRs.summarize
10
The slide uses a grid of callout boxes to present the value proposition of the ARC-100 technology.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
11
The slide uses a circular arrow icon to link methodology and deliverables, implying a process flow.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
12
The slide uses a two-box layout to separate demand-side assumptions from supply-side assumptions.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
15
The slide uses a radar chart to visualize readiness across four pillars and a table to detail specific sub-indicators.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
16
The slide uses radar charts to visualize readiness scores across multiple sub-dimensions for four key areas.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
17
The slide uses a radar chart to visualize the shift in readiness across four dimensions: Technical, Market, Policy, and Organizational.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
18
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to map readiness pillars against time horizons.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
20
The slide uses a 3D cutaway diagram of the facility to map specific equipment categories to their physical locations.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
21
Includes both a yearly timeline projection and a cumulative summary chart.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
22
The chart uses a horizontal stacked bar format where the Y-axis represents time (years) and the X-axis represents the number of units.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
23
The slide uses stacked bar charts to represent component demand over time, with a legend for component types.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
24
The slide uses two line charts to illustrate demand scenarios and the impact of lead times, followed by specific implementation recommendations and assumptions.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
25
Includes three stacked bar charts representing low, base, and high adoption scenarios for ARC-100 SMRs.size_opportunity
28
The slide uses a grid-like layout to define five distinct vendor roles: EPC/EPCM, Fabricator, Forging Shop, OEM-Skids, and OEM-Parts.decompose_segments
29
The slide uses a grid-based categorization framework to map supply chain participants.present_framework
31
The table uses a visual legend (circles with varying fill levels) to represent availability levels.analyze_data
33
The table uses a visual legend (circles) to represent availability levels. Includes specific notes on vendor selection criteria and scope exclusions.analyze_data
34
The chart is a waterfall-style stacked bar chart showing the breakdown of 18 systems.analyze_data
35
The table uses a visual indicator system (empty, half-filled, and full circles) to represent vendor availability levels.analyze_data
36
The chart is a waterfall-style visualization showing the breakdown of 12 items across three sourcing regions.analyze_data
37
Includes sample calculations for steam turbine generator and reactor vessel production times.quantify_impact
38
The table includes a legend for supplier base strength and specific notes regarding data sources and vendor locations.analyze_data
39
The table uses color-coded dots to indicate supplier base strength and highlights specific fabrication times in yellow.analyze_data
40
The chart uses bubble size for opportunity magnitude and color for capital requirements.prioritize
42
The slide uses a maturity-model-like structure to categorize fabricators into three levels based on certifications and capabilities.present_framework
43
Includes a detailed calculation methodology for supplier requirements based on production time and reactor volume.size_opportunity
44
The slide uses a matrix to visualize vendor progression over time (FOAK to NOAK).plan_implementation
46
FOAK = First-of-a-Kind; NOAK = Nth-of-a-Kind. The slide uses a side-by-side comparison structure.establish_context
47
The map highlights specific manufacturing and supply locations in North America and Europe, connected by sea routes.establish_context
48
The map uses symbols to differentiate between technology providers, fabricators, industrial areas, manufacturers, and ports.establish_context
52
The slide uses a slider-style visualization to represent qualitative assessment of criteria for each strategic option.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
53
The slide uses a custom slider-style visualization to represent qualitative assessment of criteria.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
54
The slide uses a slider-style visualization to represent qualitative assessments of strategic options against four criteria.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
55
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke diagram with a central map of New Brunswick to illustrate industry-specific challenges.diagnose
56
The table uses color-coding for likelihood (green=low, yellow=medium, red=high) and impact (pink=high, yellow=medium).diagnose
57
The slide uses a matrix structure where columns represent functional areas and rows represent maturity levels.present_framework
62
The slide is divided into two distinct sections: Demand Model and Cost Model, detailing specific data handling for missing values and scope inclusions/exclusionsummarize
63
The slide uses a 5-point scale to assess technical readiness for low-emission technologies.present_framework
64
The slide uses a 5-point scale to assess commercial readiness for low-emission technologies.present_framework
65
The slide uses a 5-level maturity scale (1-5) to assess policy readiness.present_framework
66
The slide uses a 5-point scale to define organizational maturity levels for cleantech companies.present_framework
68
The slide uses a 2x2 matrix to categorize 12 distinct systems. The quadrants are labeled 1-4.present_framework
69
The matrix uses numbered bubbles to map specific systems to quadrants, with a corresponding table for lead times.present_framework
70
The table uses a scoring system where 80 points is the cut-off for preliminary selection.present_framework