BCG · consulting-deck
Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations
406 pages · 5 arc beats · 24 loops
Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations
BCG arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 24 LOOPS
120406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380400406
Deck intelligence map
5 coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 146 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Situation & Context 8 slides 100% 8/8 slides 100% 8/8 slides · 31 hits — 0/8 slides
37.5% 3/8 slides · 7 hits 25% 2/8 slides · 3 hits 100% 8/8 slides 25% 2/8 slides Problem & Complication 16 slides 100% 16/16 slides 100% 16/16 slides · 105 hits 93.8% 15/16 slides 93.8% 15/16 slides · 32 hits 37.5% 6/16 slides 100% 16/16 slides 87.5% 14/16 slides Solution & Approach 20 slides 100% 20/20 slides 100% 20/20 slides · 104 hits 35% 7/20 slides 70% 14/20 slides · 36 hits 55% 11/20 slides · 12 hits 100% 20/20 slides 65% 13/20 slides Evidence & Proof 98 slides 100% 98/98 slides 100% 98/98 slides · 678 hits 56.1% 55/98 slides 58.2% 57/98 slides · 93 hits 19.4% 19/98 slides · 24 hits 100% 98/98 slides 83.7% 82/98 slides Impact & Next Steps 4 slides 100% 4/4 slides 100% 4/4 slides · 29 hits — 0/4 slides
75% 3/4 slides · 5 hits 50% 2/4 slides · 3 hits 100% 4/4 slides — 0/4 slides
Slide inventory
406 every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
This is a cover memorandum for a consulting deck.front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
04
Includes project constraints and specific focus areas (dog population).establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
05
The slide uses a table-like structure to map information types to actions taken.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
06
Uses a stock-and-flow diagram metaphor to explain system dynamics.diagnose
07
Uses a stock-and-flow diagram to represent the dog population system.diagnose
08
The slide highlights 'Key Findings' in green, indicating it is the current section of focus.front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
09
The slide uses a structured list format to categorize findings into operational context, public safety issues, animal welfare opportunities, and organizational summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
10
The slide uses a combination of bar charts to illustrate the demographic problem statement regarding dog population growth.diagnose
11
The chart uses a line graph to compare three scenarios: no intervention, DAS collection/placement only, and DAS + low-cost S/N surgeries.diagnose
12
Includes methodology references (WHO, WSPA, Beck Method).quantify_impact
13
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show the composition of dog bites over time, highlighting the growth of loose-owned dog bites.diagnose
14
The chart uses a stacked bar format to show both absolute volume and percentage composition of intake types over time.analyze_data
15
The slide uses a comparative bar chart approach to highlight operational efficiency gaps.compare_peers
16
The slide uses a simple three-column layout to categorize ASO activities and quantify time spent.diagnose
17
The table categorizes calls into 'Dispatched' (levels 1-6) and 'Non-dispatched' (levels 7-8).analyze_data
18
The slide uses two charts to diagnose the problem: a bar chart for growth trends and a stacked bar chart for response rates.diagnose
19
The slide uses green circles to highlight positive trends in adoption and transfer, and a negative trend in euthanasia.quantify_impact
20
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show cumulative volume, with a table below showing average dogs per partner per year.analyze_data
21
The slide uses a callout to emphasize the 2% intake figure for the top 3 rescues.quantify_impact
22
The chart uses a dashed line to indicate the mean spending of peer cities (excluding Dallas).compare_peers
23
The chart highlights the gap between current spending and the mean of benchmark cities, suggesting an $8M/yr funding opportunity.compare_peers
24
The slide uses a simple matrix-like structure to map organizational issues to specific functional areas.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
26
The slide uses a structured table format to group recommendations by priority level.recommend
27
The slide uses a numbered list format to link recommendations to specific action items.plan_implementation
28
The slide uses a 2x2 matrix structure (Impact vs Effort) to categorize initiatives. The numbering (1-5) likely corresponds to the priority level or phase.prioritize
30
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show how current funding plus various incremental needs sum up to the total required funding.quantify_impact
31
The table shows the maximum incremental cost vs. FY '15-'16 city budget.quantify_impact
38
The slide uses a 'before-after' framing to contrast the current state with the recommended state.recommend
39
The slide uses a 'From...To' comparison framework to illustrate the impact of proposed initiatives.recommend
40
The slide uses a waterfall chart to bridge the gap between current dog intake and the target 90% Live Release Rate (LRR).quantify_impact
41
The chart illustrates the impact of various surgical intervention levels on the intact dog population over time, highlighting the 46K target.recommend
42
Uses a 'From... To...' comparison framework to illustrate the desired shift in organizational culture and operations.recommend
43
The slide uses a 'From-To' framework to illustrate the impact of the proposed governance changes.recommend
44
Includes an org chart example showing accountability for specific recommendations.recommend
45
The table uses 'nq' for 'not quantified' and provides specific cost breakdowns for various operational initiatives.prioritize
46
The slide uses a structured table to break down recommendations into specific sub-initiatives with associated financial and operational metrics.recommend
47
The table outlines specific initiatives (3.6-5.3) with associated financial and operational metrics.present_solution
48
The table uses 'nq' for 'not quantified' impact. Footnotes provide context on cost assumptions and definitions.recommend
49
The chart uses a non-standard axis where the X-axis (Cost per dog) decreases from left to right, effectively making the top-right quadrant the 'Better Options' prioritize
50
The slide uses two bar charts to illustrate the decline in public perception of Animal Control services.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
51
The chart highlights a significant disparity in the perception of loose dogs as a major problem between Southern and Northern districts.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
52
Data for calendar year 2015. Source: DAS Chameleon database, BCG analysis.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
53
The slide highlights a counter-intuitive finding where a larger absolute number of 'Treatable-Rehab' dogs are euthanized compared to 'Unhealthy & Untreatable' danalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
54
The table uses a color gradient from light yellow (Animal Welfare) to light green (Public Safety) to categorize the mission statements.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
55
The slide uses a column-based comparison framework to categorize municipal animal services governance.present_framework
56
The slide uses a matrix format to contrast organizational models, highlighting trade-offs with checkmarks and crosses.compare_options
63
The slide provides context for a consulting engagement, detailing the scope of work and the research methodology used.summarize
64
The slide presents a balanced view of organizational progress versus ongoing public safety risks.diagnose
65
The slide serves as a transition from problem identification to the recommendation phase.diagnose
66
The slide outlines a structured approach to public safety and animal welfare, emphasizing a high-volume spay/neuter surge.recommend
67
The chart breaks down current funding versus incremental needs across various operational categories.quantify_impact
68
The slide serves as a methodological disclosure/preface for the following sections.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
69
The slide uses a table-like structure to map information types to specific research actions.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
70
The slide uses a narrative structure to explain the demographic challenge of dog overpopulation in specific regions of Dallas.frame_problem
71
The chart illustrates the population flow including births and deaths.analyze_data
72
The chart illustrates the net population growth of 17,000 dogs.analyze_data
73
The chart highlights that loose dogs are perceived as a significantly larger problem in Southern districts compared to Northern districts.diagnose
74
Includes methodology description for loose dog population estimation in Southern vs Northern Dallas.quantify_impact
75
The slide uses a narrative structure to explain the methodology of data validation and the findings of increasing dog bite trends.diagnose
76
The chart highlights an annual growth rate of 15% in dog bites between 2013 and 2015, with a specific focus on the 23% growth in 'Loose owned' dog bites.analyze_data
77
Includes qualitative context about resident behavior and a description of Dallas Animal Services (DAS) operations.diagnose
78
The slide provides a detailed breakdown of intake sources (Field vs. OTC) and shelter capacity utilization.diagnose
79
The slide contains detailed footnotes explaining the legal hold criteria and exclusions for the data presented.summarize
80
The chart displays four categories of health status: Healthy, Treatable-Rehabilitatable, Treatable-Manageable, and Unhealthy & Untreatable.analyze_data
81
TTM = trailing twelve months. Source: DAS Chameleon database.analyze_data
82
The chart highlights that a small number of rescue partners account for the majority of transfers.analyze_data
83
The slide includes a specific callout for Dallas (DAS Only) and a legend distinguishing benchmark vs non-benchmark cities.compare_peers
84
The slide provides a diagnostic breakdown of current ASO operations and workload distribution.diagnose
85
The slide highlights that priority 8 requests account for approximately 24% of total 311 requests.analyze_data
86
The slide contains detailed operational descriptions and quantitative performance metrics for the CARE team and ASO citation activity.summarize
87
The chart includes a trend line annotation indicating a 7% growth.analyze_data
88
The chart highlights that Dallas has 45% more ASOs per million people than the mean of the peer group.compare_peers
89
The chart highlights Dallas in orange compared to other cities. The text below provides context on Dallas Animal Services staffing.compare_peers
90
The slide includes a narrative section below the org chart discussing funding gaps and the potential for public-private partnerships.diagnose
91
The slide includes a bar chart comparing Dallas's budget over time against other cities, and a list of activities performed by local animal welfare organizationcompare_peers
92
The slide provides context on the animal welfare landscape in Dallas based on a survey conducted by BCG.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
93
The slide highlights that the top 3 rescues in Dallas only pull 2% of their intake from DAS.recommend
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
94
Uses a 'buckets and flows' metaphor to explain system dynamics.present_framework
95
Uses a system dynamics diagram (stock and flow) to explain unintended consequences of single-point interventions.diagnose
97
The slide provides context on the current mission statement and compares it to the broader landscape of comparable organizations.recommend
98
The slide uses a table to compare mission statements across 10 cities, highlighting the current focus of DAS.recommend
99
The slide references a 'balanced scorecard' approach to performance management.recommend
100
The table uses a balanced scorecard approach to track performance across five key strategic pillars.summarize
101
The slide emphasizes the interdependency of recommendations 2, 3, and 4 for sustainable results.recommend
102
The slide details specific operational changes for Dallas Animal Services (DAS) including team structure, scheduling, and financial requirements.recommend
103
The slide outlines operational improvements to increase efficiency and intake capacity for ASOs.recommend
104
The slide continues a list of recommendations starting from point 4.recommend
105
The slide continues from a previous section regarding ASO scheduling and staffing costs.recommend
106
The slide uses a narrative structure to diagnose the problem (inefficiencies in criminal vs civil citations) and proposes solutions.recommend
107
The slide contains two distinct recommendation blocks, one continuing from a previous page and one new recommendation (2.5).recommend
108
The slide is part of a BCG report on public safety and animal welfare in Dallas.recommend
109
The slide combines a quantitative impact analysis (waterfall chart) with a qualitative strategic recommendation (digital marketing).quantify_impact
110
Includes detailed footnotes regarding cost calculations for staffing and medical procedures.recommend
111
The slide is structured as a report page with two distinct sections (3.2.1 and 3.2.2) detailing the rationale and projected impact of the proposed initiatives.recommend
112
The slide uses a regression line to estimate the potential increase in adoptions per additional hour of operation.analyze_data
113
The slide outlines a strategic initiative based on benchmarking and operational efficiency.recommend
114
The slide is a page from a report, likely a consulting deck or study. It contains text-heavy analysis and quantitative survey results.diagnose
115
The slide contains two distinct sections, one focusing on process automation and the other on a new transport program.recommend
116
The slide contains detailed footnotes explaining the methodology for cost calculations.recommend
117
The slide contains detailed quantitative rationale for the recommendations, including cost estimates and projected adoption increases.recommend
118
The slide contains a footnote explaining the allocation of costs for recommendation 3.quantify_impact
119
The slide uses a rationale-based structure to justify the recommendation, citing current low spay/neuter rates, economic barriers, and historical performance ofrecommend
120
The chart illustrates the impact of different intervention levels on the intact dog population over time.size_opportunity
121
Includes a footnote regarding alternative geographic subdivision methods (census tracts).recommend
122
The slide includes a recommendation for a door-to-door canvassing program modeled after San Antonio's Comprehensive Neighborhood Sweeps Initiative.analyze_data
123
The slide contains two distinct text blocks, one discussing canvassing logistics and the other justifying the need for pet education in schools.recommend
124
This slide contains detailed text blocks with footnotes explaining the rationale and cost assumptions for animal welfare recommendations.recommend
125
Includes a specific rationale box for the sub-recommendation regarding open data.recommend
126
Contains two distinct recommendation blocks, one regarding data analyst staffing and one regarding community coordination.recommend
127
The slide contains a table with representative contexts and alternative recommended responses for DAS communications.recommend
128
Includes a table of suggested responses to common community concerns and a reference to Dallas Police Department policy.recommend
129
The slide uses a callout box to summarize the rationale for the organizational change.recommend
130
The slide uses a simple table-like structure to map three criteria against the current organizational model.diagnose
131
The slide evaluates four models: Subdivision within a department, Independent department, Partially privatized, and Completely privatized.compare_options
132
The slide discusses the trade-offs between privatization and departmental independence for animal services.recommend
134
Includes footnotes regarding salary calculations and benchmark cities.recommend
135
The slide details the composition and responsibilities of five subcommittees: Public Safety, Shelter Management, Animal Cruelty, Public Relations, and External recommend
136
The slide outlines a governance structure for an advisory commission, emphasizing expertise-based subcommittees and conflict-of-interest mitigation.present_solution
137
The slide is a text-heavy recommendation slide from a BCG report.recommend
139
Includes a footnote regarding the salary calculation for a new data analyst position.plan_implementation
140
The slide also includes a section on volunteer program expansion, which is distinct from the KPI exhibit.present_framework
141
The slide highlights the gap between DAS and other cities in leveraging volunteer labor.compare_peers
142
The slide outlines a specific operational recommendation with a cost estimate.recommend
143
The slide uses a stakeholder mapping approach to define accountability for the implementation plan.state_next_steps
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
144
The slide uses a 2x2-style matrix layout to categorize initiatives into Strategic Priorities, Medium-term Initiatives, Quick Wins, and Immediate Actions.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
145
The slide is divided into two main sections: implementation guidance and a concluding summary.state_next_steps
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
147
This is a standard appendix slide defining technical and operational terminology.appendix
148
This is a glossary page defining key operational terms for the Dallas Animal Services (DAS) context.other
149
The slide lists team members with headshots and includes a section for endnotes.appendix
150
This is a standard appendix page containing references and methodology notes.appendix
151
The slide contains a list of numbered references (xlvii to lxxxi) documenting the sources for data and analysis presented in the report.appendix
154
Includes project scope, research methodology (interviews, data analysis, benchmarking), and explicit constraints.establish_context
155
The slide acts as a guide to the structure of the project documentation.summarize
156
The slide uses a structured list format to present a comprehensive set of recommendations.recommend
157
The slide uses a numbered list format to categorize initiatives under specific strategic pillars.present_solution
158
The slide uses a 2x2 matrix structure (Impact vs Effort) to organize initiatives into four quadrants: Strategic Priorities, Medium-term Initiatives, Quick Wins,prioritize
160
The slide uses a table to summarize financial requirements for a series of initiatives, totaling $10.7M.quantify_impact
163
BCG slide, 2016. Uses a recommendation/rationale split structure.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
164
The slide uses a table to map strategic objectives to measurable KPIs with a 2-year target horizon.summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
166
The slide uses a split-column layout to contrast impact and cost.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
167
The slide uses a visual flow to demonstrate the calculation: 2 teams * 15 dogs/shift * 200 shifts/year = 6,000 dogs.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
168
The slide title mentions 10 ASOs, but the chart and assumptions table clearly reference 2 incremental ASOs. This is likely a typo in the slide title.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
169
BCG slide deck, likely part of a municipal operational efficiency study.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
170
The slide uses a peer benchmark to justify a performance gap and calculates the incremental impact based on closing that gap.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
171
The cost is derived from 4 employees at $42,000 each.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
172
The slide uses a comparative bar chart approach to highlight operational inefficiency at DAS relative to other municipal animal services.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
173
Includes a quantitative breakdown of household reach capacity for the CARE team.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
175
The slide uses a bar chart for monthly growth and a waterfall-style stacked bar chart to show response rates.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
176
The slide uses a clear recommendation-rationale structure to justify the proposed initiative.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
178
The slide uses a classic 'Impact vs Cost' structure to justify a strategic recommendation.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
179
The slide uses a combination of assumptions, stacked bar charts, and waterfall-style logic to justify the impact sizing.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
180
Includes detailed assumptions and footnotes regarding labor hours, salary calculations, and operational costs.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
181
The slide uses screenshots of the actual website to illustrate the pain points.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
182
The slide shows a mock-up of a website interface for adopting dogs, alongside specific animal profile examples (Jack and Apollo).illustrate_case
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
183
The slide uses screenshots of a Facebook page to illustrate a grassroots operational model.illustrate_case
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
184
DDINT likely refers to a specific data initiative or program. The chart compares LRR (Likelihood of Positive Outcome) for posted vs. non-posted dogs across variquantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
185
The slide uses a split-view structure to contrast impact and resource requirements.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
186
The slide uses a contrast-pair framing to show high performance (adoptions) despite low resource allocation (kennels).quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
187
Uses map-based visualization to identify geographic white space for new adoption sites.size_opportunity
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
188
The chart uses a line graph to show the relationship between the number of kennels at a new site and total dog adoptions, highlighting the 1,300 figure at the cquantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
189
Waterfall chart illustrates the buildup of costs to reach the $425k total.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
191
Uses a linear regression slope of 4.2 to estimate impact, adjusted for productivity and dog-specific adoption rates.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
192
Uses a waterfall chart to show the buildup of costs.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
193
The slide uses a clear structure to present a recommendation, its methodology, and the associated resource implications.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
194
The slide uses a bulleted list structure to explain the benefits and operational methodology of the initiative.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
195
The slide uses a qualitative scoring system (+, -, |) to evaluate intake types.prioritize
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
196
The slide uses a process flow framework to detail the operational steps of a specific program.present_framework
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
197
Uses a waterfall-style logic to arrive at the 1,000 figure.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
198
The chart uses a waterfall structure to illustrate the reduction in kennel days.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
199
The slide uses a classic 'Impact vs Cost' business case structure.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
200
The slide uses a bottom-up calculation based on survey data and current intake numbers to estimate the impact of improved account management.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
201
Includes a quote from an employee and a breakdown of current time usage.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
202
The chart highlights the proportion of intake coming from municipal shelters, specifically DAS vs other municipal sources.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
203
The chart uses a waterfall structure to aggregate intake by organization size tiers.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
204
The slide uses waterfall charts to show the composition of dog intake sources for two different sizes of rescue organizations.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
205
The chart displays survey responses from rescue organizations regarding their intake trends from DAS.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
206
The slide uses a horizontal bar chart to quantify survey responses and a callout box to highlight a specific finding regarding staff relationships.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
207
The slide uses a horizontal bar chart to quantify survey responses and includes qualitative 'unique reasons' in callout boxes.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
208
The slide uses a 'problem-to-solution' mapping framework.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
209
The slide uses a 'before-after' or 'problem-solution' framing to link survey data to actionable initiatives.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
210
The chart uses a diverging stacked bar format to visualize Likert scale survey data.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
211
The slide uses a numbered list format to present strategic principles for Key Account Management (KAM).summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
212
Slide 3.4 from a BCG deck regarding Dallas Animal Services (DAS).recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
213
Includes a map visualization of transport routes and a detailed comparison table.establish_context
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
214
The slide uses a process flow diagram combined with a responsibility matrix (RACI-like).plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
215
The slide uses a process flow combined with a responsibility matrix (RACI-like).plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
216
The chart shows a sensitivity analysis of dog transport capacity against the number of foster homes, comparing conservative and stretch scenarios.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
217
Includes a waterfall-style bar chart showing cost sensitivity to foster home capacity.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
219
The slide compares a low-cost 'connect' model versus a high-cost 'pay' model for pet owner support services.compare_options
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
220
The slide uses a structured table format to categorize support services for pet owners.illustrate_case
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
221
Uses a waterfall chart to show the cumulative impact of various interventions on dog retention.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
222
The slide uses a bar chart to visualize the incremental labor cost of $25,500, rounded to ~$26k in the title.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
223
The slide uses a clear structure to present research findings, methodology, assumptions, and the resulting impact/cost.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
224
Uses a logic flow at the bottom to explain the calculation steps.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
225
Uses a waterfall chart to illustrate the cost buildup.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
228
BCG slide from a public initiative deck regarding canine population control.summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
229
The slide uses a line chart to show population trends over time based on different surgery volumes and a bar chart to show the reduction in homeless dogs.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
230
The slide uses a table structure to compare two distinct initiatives and their associated costs.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
231
The slide breaks down costs into direct (Facilities, Staff, Consumables, Overhead, Revenue) and indirect categories, providing a per-surgery cost analysis for tanalyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
232
The table includes a highlighted section for 'Big Fix for Big D Zip Code'.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
233
The slide uses a clear 'Recommendation' vs 'Rationale' structure to justify the proposed coalition.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
235
The slide uses a two-column structure to contrast current community problems with the proposed educational solution.frame_problem
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
236
The slide uses a temple metaphor to represent the program pillars.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
237
Uses a logical chain/buildup framework to arrive at the final impact figure.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
238
The calculation is derived from 6 teachers at $66k/year each.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
239
The slide uses a clear recommendation-rationale structure to justify the proposed operational changes.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
241
Includes a specific incremental cost estimate of $30k/year.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
242
The slide uses a side-by-side comparison of recommendations and their supporting rationale.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
243
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show budget/animal distribution and a grouped bar chart to show growth trends across different organization sizes.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
244
The chart shows a distribution of the number of functions performed by animal organizations, with a clear peak in the 4-6 range.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
245
The slide uses a dual bar chart layout to contrast participation in activities versus primary focus of animal organizations.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
246
The slide compares three segments of animal organizations based on their annual animal intake volume.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
247
The slide uses a classic recommendation-rationale structure.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
248
The slide uses a comparison table to contrast historical negative comments with recommended professional responses.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
250
Includes methodology and cost assumptions for the proposed organizational change.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
251
The slide uses a numbered list structure to map organizational areas to governance impacts.present_framework
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
252
The slide uses a column-based comparison framework to categorize municipal animal services governance.compare_options
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
253
The slide uses a checkmark/cross system to denote pros and cons for each organizational model.compare_options
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
255
Slide 6.2 from a BCG deck regarding Dallas Animal Services.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
256
The chart uses a mean line that excludes Dallas. It highlights a -24% variance for FY 13-14 and a +10% variance for the tentative FY 16-17 budget.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
257
The chart uses a stacked bar approach to show municipal vs. partner funding. The 'Mean' line is a key reference point.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
258
Includes a footnote explaining the salary calculation methodology.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
259
Includes specific subcommittee names and governance policy recommendations.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
260
The slide outlines a governance structure for the commission, emphasizing specific expertise requirements for each subcommittee.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
261
The slide uses a clear recommendation-rationale structure to justify a policy change.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
263
The slide uses a comparison structure to link recommendations with their underlying rationale.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
264
The slide uses an org chart to assign accountability for specific recommendations (Rec X.X) to different organizational units.plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
265
The slide outlines a framework for performance management by focusing on controllable metrics.present_framework
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
266
The slide uses a clear 'Recommendation vs Rationale' structure to justify the proposed initiative.recommend
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
267
The chart displays a significant disparity in volunteer-derived FTEs between cities, with San Diego and Las Vegas leading.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Build Up
270
The slide serves as an introductory context page for a consulting project.establish_context
271
This is a standard BCG disclaimer/front-matter slide for working materials.front_matter
274
Uses a stock-and-flow diagram (bathtub model) to represent the dog population system.diagnose
277
The slide uses a plus/minus notation to indicate the impact of each metric on the total population calculation.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
278
Includes detailed methodology in footnotes regarding population estimates and growth rate assumptions.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
279
The slide uses a line chart to compare three scenarios: no intervention, DAS intervention only, and DAS + community S/N intervention.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
280
The slide uses a custom waterfall-like flow to show population changes from 2015 to 2016.size_opportunity
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
281
The chart uses a waterfall structure to reconcile the 2015 and 2016 dog populations.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
282
The slide uses a waterfall-style visualization to track dog population changes from 2015 to 2016.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
283
The chart uses a scatter plot to visualize population dynamics, with a clear distinction between growing areas and areas where growth is under control.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
284
The table provides a granular breakdown of dog population metrics by geographic region in Dallas, with a detailed methodological note explaining the regional deanalyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
285
The slide contains two distinct tables separated by region (BFBD and Southern Dallas).analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
286
The table includes columns for Intact/Sterilized dogs, intake percentages, outcomes, and year-over-year growth/death totals.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
287
The chart highlights a decline in recent years compared to the 2014 peak. Data includes SNN, SPCA, DAS, DCAP, and PFL.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
288
The chart highlights that 46k-69k sterilizations per year are required to reverse population growth.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
289
The table is split into two sections, with the top section highlighted by a dashed orange box labeled 'Big Fix for Big D Zip Code'.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
290
The slide uses a 'myth vs. reality' structure to debunk the idea that culture is the primary barrier to spay/neuter (S/N) services.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
291
The slide uses a combination of a central heat map and peripheral route-specific data callouts to estimate dog density.size_opportunity
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
292
Uses a capture-recapture methodology (Beck Method) endorsed by WHO and WSPA.size_opportunity
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
293
The slide uses a grid of photos to provide qualitative evidence for a census observation.illustrate_case
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
294
The slide uses a structured list format to present quantitative evidence supporting the claim that loose dogs pose a significant public safety risk.summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
295
Includes a photo of physical bite report files and a stacked bar chart showing growth by dog ownership status.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
296
The slide uses a 'triad' structure to present three distinct data sources, each with a corresponding chart, a qualitative caveat, and a methodological limitatioanalyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
297
The slide uses a grouped bar chart to highlight geographic disparities in the perception of loose dogs as a major problem.frame_problem
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
298
The slide uses two charts: a bar chart for mission priority and a stacked bar chart for satisfaction ratings. Annotations highlight the discrepancy for 'loose ddiagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
300
The slide uses a simple two-column structure to map research questions to specific analytical activities.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Funnel Analysis
301
This slide serves as a reference for the legal framework governing animal services in Dallas.establish_context
Open slide detailLoop · Funnel Analysis
302
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast input sources with output enforcement actions.present_framework
Open slide detailLoop · Funnel Analysis
303
The slide uses a process flow to illustrate the triage mechanism for animal control requests.present_framework
Open slide detailLoop · Funnel Analysis
304
The table uses a hierarchical structure to define service levels and their corresponding response metrics.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Funnel Analysis
305
The slide uses a central photo of an ASO in a vehicle to anchor multiple callout boxes containing user feedback.frame_problem
Open slide detailLoop · Funnel Analysis
306
The slide uses a two-row process flow to distinguish between criminal and civil citation workflows.present_framework
Open slide detailLoop · Funnel Analysis
307
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to visualize the distribution of citations.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Funnel Analysis
308
TTM = trailing twelve months. Data source: Google Maps, Citation data from municipal courts.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Funnel Analysis
309
The slide uses a combination of quantitative data (stacked bar chart) and qualitative insights (bullet points and quotes) to diagnose the problem.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Funnel Analysis
310
The chart uses a waterfall-style visualization to show the split between responded and not responded citations, totaling 2,368.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Funnel Analysis
312
The slide uses a clear mapping between research questions (Intake, Inside Operations, Outcomes) and the methodology used to investigate them.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
313
The table categorizes cities based on their mission statement focus, with a specific callout for Dallas Animal Services.compare_options
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
314
The slide uses a combination of a pull-quote and a line chart to demonstrate operational improvement.illustrate_case
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
315
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to quantify intake sources and a process flow diagram to define the intake categories.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
316
The chart uses a stacked bar format to show composition changes over time. CAGR is calculated for the two main categories.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
317
The slide uses TTM (Trailing Twelve Months) to smooth out seasonality, yet notes that volatility remains.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
318
The slide highlights that 80% of ASO time is spent on reactive 311 responses.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
319
The slide uses bar charts to contrast staffing density and operational efficiency (intake) against a peer benchmark mean.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
320
The slide uses stacked bar charts to visualize the geographic distribution of dog intakes. Source: DAS Chameleon database, BCG analysis.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
321
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show intake composition and a standard bar chart to compare intake channels.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
322
The slide uses red circles to highlight the 11% figure in 2012 and 2016 to emphasize the lack of progress.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
323
The chart uses color coding to categorize reasons into External, People, and Animal issues.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
324
The chart uses color coding to categorize reasons into External, People, and Animal issues.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
325
The slide uses Asilomar standards to categorize dog health. The right chart highlights 'Field Capture' and 'OTC Stray Turn-In' as having lower unhealthy percentanalyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
326
The chart uses a dual-line approach to compare total days vs days relative to legal stay.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
327
The slide uses two bar charts to illustrate how intake source and final outcome correlate with the duration of stay in the shelter.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
328
The slide uses a combination of a histogram for duration and a 100% stacked bar chart for outcomes of the long-stay cohort.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
329
The slide highlights that a significant portion of dogs leave the shelter exactly when the legal hold period expires, and compares outcomes for dogs leaving earanalyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
330
The slide includes screenshots of a 'Visual Kennel' software system and a summary table of kennel distribution.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
331
Includes annotations highlighting the 89% general utilization and 71% total utilization.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
332
The chart highlights that Labor accounts for approximately 70% of total expenditures.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
333
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show how total labor costs are allocated across different functional areas like intake, outcome volume, and medical.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
334
The slide uses a two-part table structure to differentiate between activity-based costs (per dog) and fixed costs (per day).analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
335
The slide uses a process-flow header to organize cost data into three distinct operational phases.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
336
Includes a reconciliation of modeled vs actual expenditures and a note on fixed cost allocation.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
337
The slide uses a combination of a bar chart for average days to outcome and a stacked bar chart for capacity requirements to illustrate the operational bottlenediagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
338
The slide uses a combination of stacked bar charts and a dual-axis combo chart (bar + line) to illustrate the funnel of chipped dogs and the temporal distributianalyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
339
DAS = Dallas Animal Services; LRR = Live Release Rate; RTO = Return to Owner.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
340
The slide uses green circles to highlight the CAGR of specific outcome categories.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
341
The slide uses a scatter plot to debunk a potential assumption about animal shelter performance.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
342
The slide highlights a counter-intuitive finding where a large volume of 'Treatable-Rehab' dogs are euthanized compared to 'Untreatable' dogs, suggesting an oppanalyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
343
The chart uses bubble size to represent total intake volume, with 'Bully breeds' shown in a distinct color.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
344
Includes red circle annotations highlighting specific data points. TTM = trailing twelve months.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
345
Includes a Pareto-style cumulative distribution chart for DAS and a bar chart for peer benchmarking.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
346
The chart highlights a 2% return rate for transfers, which is circled in orange.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
347
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show cumulative volume, with a specific callout for the top 10 partners.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
348
The slide uses a waterfall chart to explain the variance in total dog transfers. Annotations highlight specific partner counts and growth metrics.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
349
The slide uses a waterfall chart to explain the variance between 2014 and 2015 transfer volumes.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
350
Uses a waterfall chart to demonstrate market concentration (Gini coefficient mentioned in footnote).analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
351
The slide uses stacked bar charts to show adoption shares and a simple bar chart for kennel capacity.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
352
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show the cumulative time spent by dogs in the DAS system.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
353
The slide uses stacked bar charts to show health status and grouped bar charts for breed popularity.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
354
The slide uses three distinct charts to decompose the repeat dog intake problem.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
356
CTS = Clear the Shelters; DAS = Dallas Animal Services.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
357
Uses waterfall charts to decompose the net impact of a program (CTS) on total adoptions.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
358
The chart uses bubble size to represent annual dog intake volume.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
361
The chart uses a mean line that excludes Dallas to provide a clean benchmark comparison.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Benchmark Gap
362
The chart uses a stacked bar approach to show the split between municipal and 501(c)(3) funding. It includes a mean line and a callout indicating the funding recompare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Benchmark Gap
364
The slide uses two bar charts to illustrate negative trends in public perception of city services.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Benchmark Gap
365
Includes a disclaimer about the data not being reviewed by the benchmark city.illustrate_case
Open slide detailLoop · Benchmark Gap
366
LRR stands for Live Release Rate. The slide highlights a correlation between increased shelter intake/LRR and decreased dog attacks.illustrate_case
Open slide detailLoop · Benchmark Gap
367
Includes a disclaimer about the data not being validated by the benchmark city.illustrate_case
Open slide detailLoop · Benchmark Gap
368
Includes a disclaimer about data validation and a callout regarding spay/neuter surgeries.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Benchmark Gap
369
Includes a diagram of the contractual relationship and a list of key operational facts.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Benchmark Gap
370
Includes a diagram of contractual relationships and a list of key facts for both the city department and community-wide operations.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Benchmark Gap
371
Includes disclaimer about data validation and source attribution.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Benchmark Gap
372
Includes a disclaimer about the data being based on interviews and not fully validated.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Benchmark Gap
373
Includes a diagram of contractual relationships and a list of operational KPIs for the Austin Animal Center and the broader community.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Benchmark Gap
374
Includes disclaimer about data validation status.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Benchmark Gap
375
Includes a disclaimer about the data not being validated by the benchmark city.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Benchmark Gap
376
Includes disclaimer about data validation and scope of community-wide figures.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Benchmark Gap
377
Includes a disclaimer about the data source and validation status.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Benchmark Gap
378
Includes disclaimer about data validation and scope of community-wide figures.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Benchmark Gap
382
The slide uses a circular hub-and-spoke style diagram to categorize interventions. It highlights specific local organizations as examples for each intervention present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
383
The slide uses a combination of stacked bar charts for budget/capacity distribution and grouped bar charts for growth trends.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
384
The chart shows a distribution of the number of functions performed by organizations, with an average of 6.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
385
The slide uses a dual bar chart layout to contrast general participation in activities versus primary focus areas.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
386
Includes data on average length of stay and cost per dog, with a callout explaining the difference in open access policies.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
387
The chart uses a waterfall structure to aggregate intake numbers by organization size tiers.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
388
The slide uses a simple table structure to present survey findings.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
389
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show cumulative intake sources.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
390
Waterfall charts showing intake breakdown by source for large and small rescue organizations.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
391
The chart uses a diverging color scale to represent sentiment/change intensity.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
392
The slide uses a bar chart to quantify reasons and a list of pull-quotes to provide qualitative context.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
393
The chart highlights that 69% of organizations cite personal relationships as a key driver.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
394
The chart displays survey results from rescue partners regarding how DAS can facilitate more dog transfers.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
395
The chart uses a diverging stacked bar format to visualize Likert scale responses.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
396
The slide uses a split-panel layout to contrast positive feedback on operational improvements with negative feedback on leadership gaps.summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
397
The slide uses a split-panel layout to categorize qualitative feedback into two main themes: policy transparency and operational information access.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
399
The slide presents a survey instrument design.present_framework
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
400
The slide uses a choropleth map to visualize survey data. It includes a specific callout for District 1.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
401
The slide uses stacked bar charts to visualize survey sentiment. Data is segmented by City of Dallas, North Dallas, and Southern Dallas.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
402
Includes survey methodology notes and source attribution.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
403
The slide uses stacked bar charts to visualize survey sentiment. Yellow circles highlight specific data segments.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
404
The slide uses stacked bar charts to visualize survey data. Orange circles highlight specific positive response segments.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
405
Includes annotations (circles) highlighting specific agreement levels.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer