anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

All filtered slides

Global slide inventory for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Corpus coverage

319,975 slides

319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.

Total slides
319,975
Described
319,974
Pending
1

Slide type composition

dynamicclickable
Slide type

Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages

+Context & problem43,76713.7% · 6,592 docs+Data & charts72,62022.7% · 8,666 docs+Meta & navigation45,93614.4% · 9,739 docs+Recommend & act67,04121.0% · 9,324 docs+Cases & evidence31,2569.8% · 6,067 docs+Frameworks2,1230.7% · 1,232 docs+Appendix35,68211.2% · 6,614 docs+Other21,5496.7% · 5,566 docs

Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.

all document kinds · all orientations
18 30 60

Slide collection

22,951-22,980 of 319,975

filter-aware
28
The slide is a continuation of a previous list, focusing on options 5-8.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
29
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
30
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
31
The slide uses a numbered list format to categorize ten distinct areas of consideration for a sharing mechanism.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
32
The chart uses a waterfall-style stacked bar approach to show the composition of TOC, Expenditure, and Revenue requirement.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
33
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to visualize the composition of TOC revenue and a list to justify inclusion/exclusion criteria.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
34
The table evaluates four scenarios: No sharing, Full sharing, TOC pax and sch 8 revenue shared only, and TOC pax revenue shared only.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
35
The slide uses a categorization framework to justify a policy recommendation regarding Network Rail (NR) and Train Operating Companies (TOCs).Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
36
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to visualize the total cost base and a list to justify inclusion/exclusion decisions for specific cost categories.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
37
The table compares 'No sharing', 'Full sharing', 'TOC and NR cost sharing', and 'NR cost sharing only' across P&L items (revenue/cost) for TOC and NR.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
38
Includes a quote from a stakeholder regarding the risk of gaming the system.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
39
The slide is part of a series (1 of 6) regarding Network Rail costs.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
40
The table includes adjustments for non-PR08 funded enhancements and deferred expenditure.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
41
Source: NR, Delivery Plan Update, March 2010. Note: * Including CIRAS fee.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
42
The slide evaluates the appropriateness of cost/revenue sharing mechanisms for each of the three identified influence mechanisms.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
43
The slide uses a standard comparison matrix format to evaluate strategic options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
44
The slide compares Vertical Integration (VI) against cost/revenue sharing mechanisms in the context of UK railway structures.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
45
Part of a series of slides analyzing sharing mechanism practicalities.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
46
The slide discusses 'option value' in the context of rail franchise bidding and Value for Money (VfM).Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
47
The slide highlights the discrepancy between functional organization and geographical reporting, showing maps for both operating and strategic routes.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
48
The slide critiques the PR08 EBS mechanism as ineffective due to its national scope, which weakens the link between operator actions and financial results.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
49
The slide discusses structural changes to rail network management regions.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
50
The chart uses bubble size to represent total train kms. A vertical line at 70% highlights the threshold mentioned in the title.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
51
The slide argues that the underlying data requirements and mapping challenges remain largely the same regardless of the chosen geographic entity.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
52
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
53
The slide uses quotes from the PR08 Determination and Network Rail's CEO to substantiate the claim of uncertainty.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
54
The slide discusses the potential impact of the McNulty Rail VfM review on TOC business models.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
55
The slide uses quotes from stakeholders to emphasize the difficulty of pricing regulatory risk into bids.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
56
Discusses RPI-X regulation, capex/opex reclassification risks, and ORR/NR/TOC incentive alignment.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
57
L.E.K. consulting slide, page 56.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit