The single number that leaves the room.
71k hero stats across 25k slides. The smallest visual atom — median 19% × 12% of the canvas — and the only one that earns its slot purely on typographic discipline. One number, one label, one place.
- Big number 71.0k · 100% one digit-string sized to dominate the slide. The corpus uses one subtype, but the editorial moves are three.
- — % most common the share / growth / margin number. Carries the deck when the headline is a ratio.
- — $ / £ / € 2nd common the financial number. Anchored by currency, qualified by period.
- — count 3rd common the customers / units / countries number. Often the easiest to misread (k vs M).
Three parts. Cut any and the stat lies.
Every hero stat that lands has three pieces — the number, the label that names it, and the context that anchors it. Drop the label and it is decoration. Drop the context and it is propaganda.
- The number must dominate sized 4-8× the body text. Large enough to read across the room. Tabular numerals. No leading zero.
- The label must name one phrase under the number. "Customers" not "growth metric". The thing the number counts.
- The context must anchor period, scope, source. "FY2024 · global · audited". Without it the number is a slogan.
Three quarters of metric-slides ship two or more stats.
The 'single hero stat' is the storymakers ideal — but the corpus runs three-up far more often. 75% of metric-bearing slides ship 2+ hero stats; 23% ship 4 or more. The trio is the corpus's actual default.
- 1 stat 32% of slides the storymakers ideal — full focus, full commitment. The minority pattern.
- 2-3 stats 41% of slides the trio — corpus default. Works when each carries a different dimension (revenue · growth · margin).
- 4-6 stats 23% of slides the dashboard — slides into "every number competes" if not subordinated by hierarchy.
- 7+ stats 5% of slides the wallpaper — too many heroes, no slide-leaver. Anti-pattern in narrative decks.
Two in five hero stats are percentages.
The shape of the number tells you the slide's genre. 39.5% of hero stats are percentages — the corpus default. Currency runs second (23.5%). The shape determines which slide-type the metric belongs in, and which anti-patterns it inherits.
- +22%Percent 28.1k · 39.5%
share, growth, margin, conversion. The default hero stat — the one most slides reach for.
where it lives · KPI overviews · traction · market share · conversion funnels
- 6-7%Other 18.8k · 26.4%
mixed-format hero stats — ranges, qualifiers, multi-unit. Editorially the riskiest.
where it lives · long-tail — mixed forms, ranges, hedged estimates
- $3.46Currency 16.7k · 23.5%
price, revenue, valuation. Anchored by symbol ($, €, £); qualified by period.
where it lives · valuation · ARR · cost · pricing pages
- >160MCount 3.6k · 5%
customers, units, countries. The hardest to read accurately (k vs M is one keystroke).
where it lives · traction · install base · headcount
- 1,279Naked number 2.0k · 2.8%
no unit visible. Almost always a unit-confusion failure waiting to happen.
where it lives · long-tail — usually unit-confusion territory
- 3×Multiple 1.9k · 2.7%
ratio expressed as a multiple — growth multiples, valuation comparables.
where it lives · comparables · before/after · valuation rails
Six corpus hero stats. Three pass the discipline test.
Each one is a literal hero stat from the corpus. The strong ones name the metric and qualify the period; the weak ones leave the number to fend for itself.
-
24.3% Weighted Average IRR
Strong — sourced & qualifiednumber + label + qualifier ("weighted average") = three-part anatomy intact.
-
~$150k Cortex Average ARR per customer
Strong — sourced & qualifiedcurrency + product + denominator + flavour ("average per customer") — fully scaffolded.
-
204 Recordings Account For 80% of LTM NLS
Medium — partial anatomytwo stats fight for the lead; "LTM NLS" assumes glossary the reader may not have.
-
3.3% Adjusted Diluted EPS
Medium — partial anatomyunits + qualifier present, but no period — is it Q3? FY? trailing 12-month?
-
21.6%
Weak — number alonepercent of what, when, against which baseline? The label was lost in the layout.
-
~ 10.0%
Weak — number alonethe tilde claims uncertainty without sourcing it. The period is missing entirely.
Two-thirds of hero stats are ratios or money. Counts are 5%.
The corpus prefers 'how much' over 'how many'. Percent dominates (39.5%); currency runs second (23.5%). Counts (units, customers, countries) trail at 5%.
Hero stats split into two big buckets and a long tail. Percent (39.5%) and currency (23.5%) take two-thirds of the corpus. Multiples (3×), counts (1.5M), and naked numbers crowd into 10% combined.
The pattern reflects what the audience finds memorable. A percent compresses a comparison into one digit; a dollar figure compresses a transaction. Counts are weaker because they require context the slide rarely supplies (k vs M, active vs cumulative, peak vs average).
The corpus already chose its hero shapes. The fix is at the edges — every percent needs its denominator, every count needs its k or M, every dollar needs its period.
- Percent 39.5%
- Other 26.4%
- Currency 23.5%
- Count 5%
- Naked 2.8%
- Multiple 2.7%
Hero stats live in three vertical bands at right.
Across 71k hero stats with measured bounding boxes, the modal pattern is column-right, stacked — three numbers in a vertical rail, not one. The 'single hero' is rarer than you would think.
How to read this
- Heatmap
- Surface coverage. Each bbox in the corpus contributes to every 40×22 cell it overlaps; opacity is power-scaled (γ=0.6) so subtle bands stay visible. Darker = more atoms cover that point.
- Sample box
- The modal cluster. Atoms grouped by centre into 8×8 bins; the densest bin is plotted at its centroid, sized by the average width × height of atoms in it. Reads as: "the typical atom of this family looks roughly this big, here."
- Source
corpus.components.bbox— atoms with measured bounding boxes only. Inline mentions extracted from body text are excluded from this analysis.
Hero stats live where the deck sells size.
Metric presence concentrates in two slide-types: 'market sizing' (33%) and 'traction' (28%). Both are pitch-deck staples — the first frames the prize, the second proves the progress. The metric is the corpus's preferred vehicle when the slide says 'the number is the story'.
Hero stats orbit text and image.
Metric-bearing slides ship paragraph (42%), image (40%), list (34%) and chart (28%) at near-equal rates. Sources do better than text or images — 47% of metric slides cite. But 53% still ship a number with no provenance, and that number is louder than any unsourced photo.
- 01 Title 95.8%almost universal — hero stats need framing
- 02 Source-note 46.6%— half of metric slides cite. Below tables (50%) but above charts (39%).
- 03 Paragraph 42.3%narrative orbit — the text explains what the number means
- 04 Image 40%metric + image — the marketing-default combo
- 05 List 34.3%metric + list — bullet caveats around the number
- 06 Chart 27.9%metric + chart — the number IS the chart's headline
- 07 Disclaimer 12.2%caveat layer — finance and regulated metrics
- 08 Callout 10.3%rare — metric and callout compete for the editorial focal point
Five metric failures. All erode trust.
A bad metric is loud and confident. The corpus repeats five failure modes — each one inherits the metric's volume and uses it against the audience.
-
∅ The unsourced stat
A number sized to dominate the slide, with no source, no period, no scope.
53%- Bad
- "500% growth" in 200pt type, no caption.
- Fix
- Three-line context block: source, period, scope. "Internal · 2020-2024 · ARR cohort".
-
◐ The cherry-picked period
A number whose impressiveness depends on the start date you cannot see.
common- Bad
- "+200% YoY" — measured from a Covid-era trough.
- Fix
- Disclose the baseline AND the absolute number. "+200% YoY · from $5M to $15M base".
-
⊘ The unit-confusion stat
A number where the unit is implied but ambiguous (k vs M, % vs pp, $ vs €).
~10%- Bad
- "1.5M users" — million? thousand? cumulative? active?
- Fix
- Unit always inline with the number. "1.5M monthly active users · Q3 2024".
-
% The naked percent
A percentage with no denominator visible. "26% of what?"
~20%- Bad
- "26% growth" — of revenue? of users? at what scale?
- Fix
- Always declare the denominator. "26% YoY revenue growth · ARR cohort".
-
◳ The metric soup
7+ stats on one slide. Each one cancels the others.
5%- Bad
- KPI dashboard with 12 numbers, no hierarchy, no protagonist.
- Fix
- Three stats maximum. The other nine become a table or move to appendix.
Four rules. Earn the volume.
A hero stat borrows its volume from the typographic discipline behind it. These four rules protect that contract — no number ships without scaffolding.
- 01
Number, label, context — always
The triangle is non-negotiable. Sized number, named label, anchored context. Drop any and the stat becomes propaganda.
3 parts, every time - 02
Three stats maximum
One commits, three triangulate, seven dilute. If you have more than three numbers to show, build a table or a chart — not a stat grid.
23% slides ship 4+ - 03
Source every number
Tables hit 50% sourced, metrics 47%, charts 39%. Tables and metrics are the high-trust evidence atoms — keep the bar high.
47% currently sourced - 04
Units inline, never implied
"$" / "€" / "%" / "k" / "M" / "pp" — every number ships its unit. No exception, no defaulting, no "context will tell".
~10% lose units