Azerion | Investor Presentation Deck | 32 slides

Azerion · 2023-05
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

32
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
inspire_vision
Open slide detailLoop · Golden Circle
02
The slide uses a visual funnel/progression metaphor to link user growth to market size.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Market SizeLoop · Golden Circle
03
The slide uses a value-chain style diagram to show the 'spends' and 'receives' flow through various ad-tech layers.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction
04
The slide uses a value-chain style flow diagram to show the disintermediation of traditional ad-tech layers.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
05
Uses a value chain comparison to illustrate market inefficiency vs. Azerion's one-stop shop model.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
06
The slide uses a value-chain style diagram to illustrate the platform ecosystem.inspire_vision
Open slide detailLoop · Golden Circle
07
The slide uses a map background to emphasize the global nature of the platform.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Business Model
08
The slide includes a bar chart for revenue, a donut chart for revenue split, and a list of value drivers.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Business Model
09
The slide uses a value-chain style flow to map demand sources to supply channels via a central adtech platform.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Business Model
10
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke style layout to show how diverse assets contribute to the central Azerion value proposition.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
11
The slide uses a visual matrix to contrast Azerion's vertical integration against fragmented competitors.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
12
The slide uses a 4-column layout to define audience preferences.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
13
The slide categorizes reach into three segments: Non-game content (>400m), Game content (>100m), and E-commerce.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
14
The slide uses a comparative structure to contrast two business models (Casual vs Premium) and provides aggregate scale metrics at the bottom.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
15
The slide uses a comparative structure to show the breadth of the platform's utility across different customer segments.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
16
The slide uses a layered visual structure to represent the value proposition components.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
17
The slide uses a split-layout comparing strategic delivery points with key financial metrics.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
18
The slide uses a process-style arrow graphic to represent integration progress.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
19
The slide uses a clear layout to contrast financial metrics with their corresponding strategic drivers.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
20
Includes a waterfall chart for cash conversion and a bridge chart for net debt.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
21
The slide uses two bar charts to illustrate operational and financial trends, paired with bulleted explanations.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
22
The slide uses a combination of a dual-axis combo chart for operational metrics and a grouped bar chart for financial performance.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
23
The slide uses a two-column layout to map strategic pillars to specific operational achievements.summarize
24
The slide uses a value-chain style diagram to map the flow from advertisers to consumers through the company's proprietary technology stack.present_solution
25
Uses a value chain comparison to illustrate market fragmentation vs. Azerion's one-stop shop model.present_solution
26
The slide uses a feature-comparison table to differentiate between two tiers of publisher partnerships.present_solution
27
The slide highlights the synergy between a content aggregator (Genba) and a storefront (Voidu).present_solution
28
Includes specific metrics for Love Island villa (3m visits, 52 min avg time) and Habbo Avatars (11.6k items, 4.5k owners, 0.115 floor price, 6.1k volume).show_traction
29
The slide uses a central donut chart for gender and monthly plays, surrounded by game icons and flanked by bar charts for age and geography.show_traction
31
Q1 2023 investor pack, page 31.other
32
front_matter