Spruce Point Capital Management · activist-deck
Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD)
70 pages · 5 arc beats · 5 loops
Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD)
Spruce Point Capital Management · 2025-01 arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 5 LOOPS
1510152025303540455055606570
Deck intelligence map
5 coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 39 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Hook 1 slides 100% 1/1 slides 100% 1/1 slides · 6 hits — 0/1 slides
— 0/1 slides
— 0/1 slides
100% 1/1 slides — 0/1 slides
Situation & Context 2 slides 100% 2/2 slides 100% 2/2 slides · 12 hits — 0/2 slides
— 0/2 slides
100% 2/2 slides 100% 2/2 slides — 0/2 slides
Problem & Complication 4 slides 100% 4/4 slides 100% 4/4 slides · 22 hits — 0/4 slides
— 0/4 slides
75% 3/4 slides 100% 4/4 slides 25% 1/4 slides Evidence & Proof 19 slides 100% 19/19 slides 100% 19/19 slides · 125 hits — 0/19 slides
— 0/19 slides
84.2% 16/19 slides 100% 19/19 slides 57.9% 11/19 slides Impact & Next Steps 13 slides 100% 13/13 slides 100% 13/13 slides · 94 hits — 0/13 slides
— 0/13 slides
69.2% 9/13 slides 100% 13/13 slides 100% 13/13 slides Slide inventory
70 every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
The image uses a pun on 'asphalt' (as-faulty) and depicts a road construction scene, likely implying the company is about to be 'run over' or is in a dangerous front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Hook
04
Includes a stock chart with a callout annotation marking the warning date.cite_precedent
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
05
Standard Spruce Point Capital Management branding.front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
06
The slide uses a red-bordered callout box for the primary thesis and a two-row table for supporting arguments.diagnose_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
07
The slide uses a sidebar-body layout common in activist decks to present a series of red flags.diagnose_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
08
This is a classic activist investor thesis slide, setting the stage for the subsequent critique.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
09
The slide uses red arrows to highlight the shifting language across three distinct time periods (2020, 2022, 2024).expose_contradiction
10
Uses color-coded highlighting to emphasize specific phrases in management quotes.expose_contradiction
11
The slide uses two tables to categorize PE activity into 'ROAD's Markets' and 'Other Markets'.compare_peers
12
The slide uses three side-by-side table excerpts to show the progression of the company's ranking and eventual disappearance.expose_contradiction
13
The slide highlights the removal of 'Construction Partners' from the 2024 list compared to its #94 position in 2023.expose_contradiction
14
The slide uses red highlighting to emphasize the gap between guidance and actual performance.expose_contradiction
15
The slide uses red boxes to highlight specific losing bids by Wiregrass Construction Company.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
16
Uses a screenshot of a DOT bid document to highlight Ferebee's underperformance.expose_contradiction
17
Uses red arrows and highlights to draw attention to specific data points and text contradictions.expose_contradiction
18
Uses a specific precedent (Granite Construction) to frame the high DSO as a red flag for potential accounting fraud.expose_contradiction
19
The slide uses a before-and-after comparison to show how the company's financial reporting metrics have shifted over time.expose_contradiction
20
The slide uses a table to demonstrate the discrepancy between two different FCF calculation methodologies over an 8-year period.expose_contradiction
21
Uses a 'before-after' comparison of 10-K language to highlight potential revenue manipulation.expose_contradiction
22
The slide uses a direct excerpt from a 10-K filing to frame a concern about revenue recognition practices.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
23
The slide uses a specific formula for ROCE (Adj. EBIT / Capital Deployed) to highlight the decline.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
24
The slide uses data tables to contrast performance metrics and highlight negative trends in volume and pricing.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
25
The slide uses color-coded text (red for ROAD's aggressive language, yellow for peer's conservative language) to visually emphasize the contradiction.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
26
The slide uses a table to contrast total backlog growth against deteriorating quality metrics.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
27
The slide uses a red box to draw attention to the specific change in accounting/disclosure regarding reserve life.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
28
The slide highlights a discrepancy between the company's reliance on reserve estimates for depletion and the absence of reported reserve figures.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
29
The slide uses a table to calculate the ratio of deal costs to cash paid for acquisitions over a 7-year period.expose_contradiction
31
Uses FOIA data to derive implied Q4 results.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailLoop · The Reveal
32
The slide uses a table of management quotes alongside a bar chart to visually demonstrate the discrepancy between stated performance drivers and actual margin texpose_contradiction
Open slide detailLoop · The Reveal
33
The slide uses a FOIA request to establish a trend of declining contract value, suggesting potential financial shortfalls for the company (ROAD).analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · The Reveal
34
The table includes a total contract value row at the bottom.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · The Reveal
35
The slide uses screenshots of official government documents to substantiate claims regarding contract awards.illustrate_case
Open slide detailLoop · The Reveal
36
The table provides granular evidence of contract activity, totaling over $275M in value.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · The Reveal
37
The table shows a total contract value of $108,333,330.47 for the listed contracts.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · The Reveal
38
The slide uses a 'before-after' style contradiction to imply management is hiding negative developments regarding Florida infrastructure contracts.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailLoop · The Reveal
39
Uses a table to present analyst quotes as evidence of naive acceptance of management claims.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailLoop · The Reveal
40
The table uses a matrix format to show the impact of two variables on EBITDA.quantify_opportunity
Open slide detailLoop · The Reveal
42
Uses a 'before-after' style juxtaposition of company marketing materials vs. critical expert commentary.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailLoop · Analogy
43
Includes a CEO quote to frame the company's own narrative on margins, which the slide then challenges with benchmark data.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Analogy
44
The slide uses a 'suspicious' framing to imply financial manipulation or misrepresentation of employee counts.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Analogy
45
The slide uses a callout box to frame the narrative against the company's own presentation of backlog growth.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailLoop · Analogy
46
Uses a red-box callout strategy to highlight discrepancies between marketing materials and financial statements.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailLoop · Analogy
47
Uses a red arrow to highlight the margin discrepancy between the two presentations.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailLoop · Analogy
48
Includes a quote from an industry expert and screenshots of MSHA inspection records.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailLoop · Analogy
49
The slide uses screenshots of official legal documents to substantiate the claim of regulatory issues.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailLoop · Analogy
50
The slide uses a screenshot of a government database and a corresponding table to substantiate the claim of active regulatory violations.expose_contradiction
51
The slide highlights LSP's lack of competitiveness in recent Texas DOT projects, specifically calling out Texas Materials Group and Knife River Corp.compare_peers
52
Uses a red arrow to visually connect the table data to the financial statement disclosure to highlight the discrepancy.expose_contradiction
53
The slide uses screenshots of official government procurement documents to substantiate the claim.expose_contradiction
54
Uses a 'guilt by association' framework to undermine the credibility of the target company's financial reporting.expose_contradiction
55
The slide uses a combination of press release excerpts and map-based evidence to cast doubt on the acquisition's quality.expose_contradiction
56
The slide uses red boxes to highlight Overland's higher bids compared to Cummins in four specific project examples.expose_contradiction
57
Uses screenshots of official bid reports to substantiate the claim of weak positioning.expose_contradiction
58
This is a classic activist 'thesis' slide, often used as a section divider or opening hook.summarize
59
The slide uses a red arrow to visually connect the 'Inaccurate Financial Data' box to the 'Spruce Point's Pro Forma Adjusted Capital Structure' table, emphasizishow_valuation_bridge
60
The slide uses a table to list analyst ratings and a pie chart to visualize the 50/50 split between Buy and Neutral ratings.preempt_rebuttal
61
The slide uses a combination of a stock price/estimate chart and a data table to highlight the disconnect between market sentiment and operational reality.expose_contradiction
62
The table highlights that ROAD's valuation multiples (EV/EBITDA) are significantly higher than the peer group averages.compare_peers
63
Includes a quote from a Tegus interview to support the argument that aggregate permitting is difficult, implying ROAD's reserves are less valuable than the markcompare_peers
64
The slide highlights ROAD's outlier status in leverage and its lower-than-peer-average margins in the materials segment.compare_peers
65
The slide uses a combination of qualitative expert testimony and a detailed operational/financial comparison table to argue for ROAD's overvaluation.compare_peers
66
The table highlights ROAD's missing data with '??' in a red-highlighted column.expose_contradiction
67
The chart shows a stock price trend with red icons (likely insider sales) and green icons (likely insider buys).expose_contradiction
68
The slide uses a combination of qualitative expert testimony and quantitative historical valuation charts to support a short thesis.show_valuation_bridge
69
The slide uses two distinct tables to categorize related-party compensation versus business payments.expose_contradiction
70
The slide uses a 'valuation_table' to justify a short thesis, contrasting quantitative downside scenarios with qualitative 'Factors Why ROAD's Valuation Should show_valuation_bridge