PERILS OF PERCEPTION

Ipsos
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 3 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

30
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
02
This is a disclosure/methodology slide setting the stage for the report.front_matter
03
summarize
04
frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction
05
The chart displays 'Agree' percentages in teal bars and 'Disagree' percentages in red bars for 30 markets.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction
06
transition
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
07
transition
Open slide detailBeat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction
08
The chart highlights a discrepancy between public opinion (percentages) and actual scientific ranking of carbon savings.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction
09
The chart highlights a perception gap where low-impact actions like recycling are ranked higher in public opinion than high-impact actions like not having a carcompare_options
Open slide detailBeat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction
10
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
11
The chart compares public perception (Global Average vs GB) against the 'True rank' of effectiveness for climate change mitigation actions.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
12
The slide highlights a discrepancy between public perception and actual climate impact, noting that low-impact actions are often overestimated.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
13
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
14
frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Voice Of Customer
15
Highlights the gap between public perception (surveyed) and reality (actual data).diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Voice Of Customer
16
The chart highlights Great Britain with a yellow border. Data source: Ipsos Perils of Perception 2021.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Voice Of Customer
17
This slide uses a provocative, conversational headline to emphasize a specific data point about public perception.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Voice Of Customer
18
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to visualize survey responses, highlighting a significant gap between public perception and scientific data.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Voice Of Customer
19
The slide highlights a 'peril of perception' regarding climate data.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Voice Of Customer
20
The image serves as a visual metaphor for the environmental impact of food production.transition
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Mece Breakdown
21
The slide uses a blue background with white text, typical of Ipsos 'Perils of Perception' reports.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Mece Breakdown
22
The slide highlights a misconception where 57% of respondents incorrectly believe a local diet with meat is better than a vegetarian diet with some imports.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Mece Breakdown
23
The slide highlights a common misconception where people prioritize local food over vegetarianism for emissions reduction. Great Britain is highlighted.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Mece Breakdown
24
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Mece Breakdown
25
The slide highlights a significant knowledge gap, as 86% of respondents could not estimate the distance.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
26
The slide highlights a significant knowledge gap (83% don't know) and compares public perception to scientific data.illustrate_case
27
Standard Ipsos methodology disclosure slide.other
30
Standard corporate boilerplate slide.summarize