Global Risks Report 2024

World Economic Forum
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 10
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

3
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

124
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
Includes partnership attribution to Marsh McLennan and Zurich Insurance Group.front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
02
other
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
03
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
04
Includes a headshot of the author and acknowledgments.front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
05
The slide describes the data collection process for the World Economic Forum's Global Risks Report.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
06
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to compare short-term (2-year) vs long-term (10-year) risk outlooks.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
07
The slide discusses the 'point of no return' for environmental risks and the impact of polarization on truth.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate (Make it worse)
08
The slide uses a color-coded legend for risk categories (Economic, Environmental, Geopolitical, Societal, Technological).summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate (Make it worse)
09
The slide uses a node-link diagram to show risk interdependencies, with node size representing risk influence and edge thickness representing relative influenceanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate (Make it worse)
10
This slide is a text-heavy summary page from the Global Risks Report 2024.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction
11
The slide uses color-coding to represent risk categories (Economic, Environmental, Geopolitical, Societal, Technological).prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction
12
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to compare short-term (2-year) and long-term (10-year) risk outlooks.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction
13
The chart categorizes risks into Economic, Environmental, Geopolitical, Societal, and Technological groups.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction
14
The slide includes a horizontal bar chart ranking 10 global risks by severity.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction
15
The slide contains two distinct figures (1.4 and 1.5) from the World Economic Forum Global Risks Report 2024.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction
16
The chart uses color-coding to represent risk categories (Economic, Environmental, Geopolitical, Societal, Technological) across age cohorts.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction
17
The slide uses a network graph (nodes and edges) to represent risk interdependencies, with node size indicating influence and edge thickness indicating relativeanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction
18
Includes a stacked bar chart showing severity distribution on a 1-7 Likert scale.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction
19
The slide includes a list of specific countries with their election timing and internet penetration stats alongside a global heat map.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction
20
This slide is from the Global Risks Report 2024, page 20. It uses a narrative structure to explain the risks of polarization and the erosion of truth.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction
21
The slide uses a node-link diagram to show risk influence and relative influence between different global risk categories.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
22
The chart shows a distribution of severity scores for interstate armed conflict, with 8% of respondents rating it at the highest severity level (7).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
23
The chart uses a dual-axis approach to correlate conflict frequency with fatality counts.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
24
Page 24 from Global Risks Report 2024.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
25
Data sourced from Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
26
Page 26 of the Global Risks Report 2024.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
27
Includes two distinct charts: a stacked bar chart for severity and a line chart for search interest over time.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
28
The slide uses two heat maps to visualize the shift in perceived economic risk across countries between 2022 and 2023.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
29
Contains two charts: Figure 1.17 (Inflation) and Figure 1.18 (Global PMI).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
30
The slide is a text-heavy page from a report, likely the Global Risks Report 2024, discussing macroeconomic headwinds.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
31
The slide discusses the resilience of large corporations versus the vulnerability of SMEs and emerging economies to high interest rates.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
32
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
33
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
34
This is page 34 of a report, containing references 16 through 33.appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
35
This is a continuation of a bibliography or reference list.appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
36
This is a continuation of a bibliography or reference section.appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
37
The chart uses a 2x2 matrix structure to categorize risks by short-term vs long-term severity.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
38
The slide includes a legend for risk categories (Economic, Environmental, Geopolitical, Societal, Technological) and detailed commentary on the trends.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
39
The table uses color-coding to represent risk categories: Economic (blue), Environmental (green), Geopolitical (orange), Societal (red), and Technological (purpanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
40
The slide defines structural forces as long-term shifts in the arrangement of and relation between systemic elements of the global landscape.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
41
The slide uses a split-field image as a metaphor for environmental or systemic change.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
42
Data from World Economic Forum Global Risks Perception Survey 2023-2024. Uses a 1-7 Likert scale for severity.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
43
The slide highlights the complexity and interconnectedness of climate tipping points, noting that current models may underestimate non-linear impacts and cascadestablish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
44
Includes a network diagram showing interconnections between environmental and socioeconomic risks.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
45
The chart displays country-level risk rankings from the Executive Opinion Survey 2023, with color representing climate adaptation readiness.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
46
The chart highlights a significant gap between current finance flows and projected adaptation needs.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
47
Figure 2.9. Source: Climate Central, 2023. Light-blue overlay marks areas below water level.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
48
Contains footnotes referencing specific risks and investments.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
49
Contains two radar charts comparing survey responses across nine governance approaches.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
50
The slide presents a stacked bar chart comparing short-term (2 years) vs long-term (10 years) risk perception of AI.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
51
The slide uses a network graph to show risk interconnections. The text discusses the implications of AI market concentration on security and supply chains.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
52
The slide contains two distinct figures from the World Economic Forum Global Risks Report 2024.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
53
This appears to be a page from a report (Global Risks Report 2024, page 53).summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
54
Magazine-style page; Box 2.6 highlights concentration of AI power in a small set of Big Tech firms and founders. Photo credit: Michael Dziedzic / Unsplash.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
55
This slide is from the Global Risks Report 2024, page 55. It includes a main section on AI escalation and a callout box (Box 2.7) on novel bioweapons.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
56
The slide uses radar charts to visualize survey data across multiple categories of risk governance approaches.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
57
Data from World Economic Forum Global Risks Perception Survey 2023-2024.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
58
The chart uses a spaghetti plot approach to show global trends with specific highlighted data points annotated with historical events.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
59
The diagram uses node size to represent risk influence and edge thickness to represent relative influence, categorized by risk type.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
60
Data sourced from World Economic Forum Future of Jobs Report 2023.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
61
The chart uses a 2x2 matrix structure to highlight countries where both risks are perceived as high.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
62
The chart highlights the disparity between current projected spending and the financing needs required to reach Sustainable Development Goals by 2030.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
63
Figure 2.22 from Global Risks Report 2024.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
64
Contains two distinct sections: Post-SDGs and Stranded people. Includes a photo of a classroom.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
65
This slide is a text-heavy box from a report, likely Global Risks Report 2024.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
66
Page 66 from the Global Risks Report 2024.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
67
The slide contains a text-heavy analysis section followed by a figure (2.23) showing survey results on risk governance approaches.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
68
The slide uses a 100% stacked bar chart to visualize survey responses on a Likert scale.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
69
The slide uses a grouped bar chart format to compare two years of data for criminal markets and actors.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
70
The slide uses a node-link diagram to visualize risk interdependencies, categorized by economic, environmental, geopolitical, societal, and technological factoranalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
71
The chart uses a dot plot/scatter-like visualization to map risk ranking (x-axis) against geographic regions (y-axis), with color representing criminality scoreanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
72
The chart uses a dot plot format to show risk ranking (x-axis) by region (y-axis), with color representing criminality score.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
73
This is a page from a report (Global Risks Report 2024). It contains two distinct sections: a box on the fentanyl epidemic and a section on state-enabled criminsummarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
74
The chart uses color to represent corruption levels and bubble size to represent peace levels.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
75
The slide contains two radar charts comparing approaches to risk governance for two specific risk categories.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
76
Figure 2.31 from the World Economic Forum Global Risks Perception Survey 2022-2023.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
77
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
78
This is a continuation of a bibliography/reference section from a larger report.appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
79
This is a page from a report appendix containing bibliographic references.appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
80
This is a standard bibliography/reference page found at the end of a professional report.appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
81
This is a continuation of a bibliography or reference section from a report.appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
82
This is a standard bibliography/reference page from a report.appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
83
Page 83 of the Global Risks Report 2024.appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
84
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
85
The text discusses the 'free rider problem' and public goods in the context of global risk management.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
86
The chart displays the share of respondents who believe national and local regulations are the most effective approach for addressing specific global risks.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Quick Win Big Bet
87
This appears to be a page from a report (Global Risks Report 2024).summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Quick Win Big Bet
88
Page image not available at /tmp/legacy-images/c1199c966e738cd3/slides/088.jpg; unable to inventory.
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Quick Win Big Bet
89
The slide discusses how individual and business actions, when aggregated, can address global risks, supported by a bar chart of corporate strategy priorities.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Quick Win Big Bet
90
This appears to be a page from a report (Global Risks Report 2024).summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Quick Win Big Bet
91
Source: World Economic Forum Global Risks Perception Survey 2023-2024.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Quick Win Big Bet
92
Page 92 of the Global Risks Report 2024.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Quick Win Big Bet
93
Respondents could select up to three responses from nine options.analyze_data
95
The slide is a reference page from a report, likely the Global Risks Report 2024.appendix
96
Source: Global Risks Report 2024, page 96.summarize
97
This is a glossary-style table from the Global Risks Report 2024.summarize
98
Source: World Economic Forum Global Risks Perception Survey 2023-2024.summarize
99
The slide details the survey timeline, the addition of 7 new risks, recategorization of existing risks, and the 7-section structure of the survey methodology.appendix
100
This slide details the survey structure for the Global Risks Report 2024.summarize
101
The slide uses a mix of donut, bar, and bubble charts to visualize demographic data.summarize
102
The risks are color-coded by category. The list is presented in two columns.appendix
103
The table uses color-coded bars to indicate risk categories (Economic, Environmental, Geopolitical, Societal, Technological).analyze_data
104
The table uses color-coded bars on the left of each risk to indicate the risk category.analyze_data
105
The slide uses color-coded bars on the left of each risk item to denote the risk category.analyze_data
106
The table uses color-coded bars to indicate the category of each risk.analyze_data
107
The table uses color-coded bars to indicate risk categories (Economic, Environmental, Geopolitical, Societal, Technological).analyze_data
108
The table uses color-coded bars to indicate the risk category for each item.analyze_data
109
The table uses color-coded bars to indicate risk categories (Economic, Environmental, Geopolitical, Societal, Technological).summarize
110
The slide uses color-coded bars to categorize risks into Economic, Environmental, Geopolitical, Societal, and Technological categories.analyze_data
111
The risks are color-coded by category (Economic, Environmental, Geopolitical, Societal, Technological).analyze_data
112
Figure D.1 in Appendix D 'Risk governance'. Source: WEF Global Risks Perception Survey 2023-2024. Bars colored by risk category (Economic, Environmental, Geopolappendix
113
The slide contains two distinct charts (Figure D.2 and D.3) comparing risk mitigation approaches.analyze_data
114
Data from World Economic Forum Global Risks Perception Survey 2023-2024.analyze_data
115
This is a standard acknowledgement page found in the appendix of a consulting or research report.appendix
116
This is a page from an appendix listing contributors.other
117
This is a standard disclosure/acknowledgment page listing institutional partners.other
118
This is a page from the Global Risks Report 2024, listing contributors/partners.appendix
119
This is a page from an appendix listing institutional partners and their representatives.other
120
This is a continuation of a list of contributors, likely from an appendix section of a report.appendix
122
appendix
123
This is a standard acknowledgements page found at the end of a professional report.other
124
This is a standard corporate cover/back slide for WEF presentations.front_matter