Challenges in Mining Scarcity Opportunity

McKinsey
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 3 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

41
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
02
The chart uses a background image of mining equipment and includes specific CAGR annotations.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Pattern Hunter
03
The slide uses two bar charts to illustrate productivity declines across commodities and regions.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Pattern Hunter
04
The slide uses a split-view: a bar chart for productivity on the left and a series of comparative bar charts for cost/volume drivers on the right.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Pattern Hunter
05
The slide uses a 2x2 matrix layout to categorize strategic initiatives.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Pattern Hunter
06
illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Pattern Hunter
07
Uses a value chain framework to categorize technological maturity in mining.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Pattern Hunter
08
The slide uses a dual-track timeline to compare two specific technology categories (drills vs haulage) against a common time axis.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Pattern Hunter
09
The slide uses a chronological timeline to illustrate the progression of industry partnerships and technological achievements.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Pattern Hunter
10
The slide uses a numbered list format to decompose the system architecture.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Pattern Hunter
11
The chart uses bubble size to indicate resource size and color to distinguish between heavy and light rare earth projects.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Pattern Hunter
12
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Pattern Hunter
13
Background watermark of a pen on paper.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Pattern Hunter
14
The central image is a mine site, surrounded by octagonal callouts detailing specific industry challenges.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Pattern Hunter
15
The slide uses a custom index (2004=100) to track productivity across ~50 mines.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Pattern Hunter
16
cite_precedent
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
17
The slide uses a background photo of a mine with overlaid icons and labels to show system integration.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
18
compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
19
The slide uses a central image with callouts to specific components (GPS, Status Lights, REG, Gyro, Control Cabinet) and a right-hand column for technical commepresent_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
20
present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
21
The slide uses a color-coded system (green/red) to indicate favorable vs adverse economic impacts.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
22
The slide uses a waterfall chart to decompose cost savings across OEE, operating costs, and capex.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
23
The slide uses flag-shaped markers on a world map to indicate trial sites, with color-coding corresponding to different technology providers.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
24
The slide uses a horizontal process flow to depict technological progression.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
25
present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
26
The slide uses a color-coded icon system (green thumbs up for favorable, red thumbs down for adverse) to indicate the direction of impact.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
27
The chart uses a waterfall structure to decompose cost drivers into OEE, Operating/Maintenance, and Capex categories.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
28
The table uses a hierarchical structure to group levers under OEE, Operating and maintenance costs, and Capex.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
29
The chart uses a dual-line approach (solid for revenue, dashed for EBITDA) with CAGR annotations and circular callouts for EBITDA margins.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Golden Circle
30
The slide uses a background image of a clock and calendar to emphasize the theme of future positioning.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Golden Circle
31
McKinsey & Company slide 30.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Golden Circle
32
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast applications of Light vs Heavy RE elements.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Golden Circle
33
The slide uses a map-based visualization to contrast China's reserve dominance with the import dependency of other major economies.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Golden Circle
34
The table uses flags to indicate country of origin and pie-chart-like icons for likelihood.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Golden Circle
35
The chart uses a split-bar approach to show spending vs. discovery counts, with a specific focus on the gap between global actuals and needs.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Golden Circle
36
The slide uses a numbered list format to present industry challenges.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Golden Circle
37
The slide uses a series of line charts to show price trends from 2002 to 2017, with specific projections for 2016/2017.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction
38
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction
39
The slide uses a causal link between supply restriction (left chart) and price volatility (right chart).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction
40
The slide uses a moon-phase icon system to indicate viability, with the substitution option being the 'fullest' moon.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction
41
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to compare project counts vs production volume.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps