Now decides next: Getting real about Generative AI

Deloitte
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

31
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
02
front_matter
03
The slide uses a dark theme with abstract blue/purple light waves at the bottom right.front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
04
The slide serves as an introduction to a Deloitte quarterly survey report on GenAI.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
05
Includes a disclaimer/methodology box at the bottom right.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
06
Includes a methodology disclosure box on the right.summarize
07
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
08
The slide uses quotes from executives to illustrate the tension between traditional ROI metrics and the strategic necessity of GenAI experimentation.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
09
The slide uses a lollipop chart to compare 'Very high expertise' vs 'Overall' across 10 benefit categories.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain
10
The chart compares 7 categories of GenAI adoption/investment metrics across two expertise levels.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain
11
The slide uses a three-column layout to present qualitative insights and a direct quote from a transformation officer.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain
12
The slide uses a bubble chart to visualize survey results regarding reinvestment priorities.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain
13
Includes qualitative insights from CTO and CIO interviews regarding scaling barriers and phased approaches.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
14
The chart displays workforce access percentages segmented by organizational expertise levels in GenAI.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
15
diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
16
The slide uses a stylized abstract graphic on the left and a framed quote on the right.illustrate_case
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
17
The slide is divided into 'Areas of strength' and 'Opportunities for improvement' using donut charts to visualize key metrics.summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
18
The slide contrasts overall survey results with those from organizations reporting 'very high' expertise in GenAI.summarize
19
The slide uses a timeline chart to visualize survey data regarding the expected timeframe for talent strategy changes.summarize
20
Includes a quote from an executive and a bubble chart visualizing survey data.summarize
21
The chart uses a bubble-based ranking visualization to display survey results.analyze_data
22
Figure 10. Data source: Jan./Feb. 2024 survey.analyze_data
23
Includes two distinct quotes from industry executives regarding GenAI's impact on talent and business risk.summarize
24
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
25
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
26
state_next_steps
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
27
state_next_steps
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
29
This is a standard disclosure/about page for Deloitte research centers.other
30
Includes specific respondent counts by country and criteria for inclusion.appendix
31
front_matter