Reinventing for resilience

Accenture
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 6 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

30
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
Features a high-resolution photograph of a gnarled tree trunk, symbolizing resilience.front_matter
03
front_matter
04
Uses a nature metaphor to introduce the theme of resilience.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Why Now
05
The slide uses a metaphor of a motorcycle navigating a challenging desert landscape to represent the dual imperative of business leadership.transition
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Why Now
06
establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Why Now
07
The slide uses a series of line charts to visualize the growth of disruption across different categories.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Why Now
08
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Segmentation Split
09
The matrix uses Revenue Growth (CAGR) on the x-axis and Profitability (EBT margin) on the y-axis.decompose_segments
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Segmentation Split
10
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Mece Breakdown
11
The chart uses a dual-line approach to show performance gaps before and after two distinct disruptive events.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Mece Breakdown
12
The slide uses a table to map macro dimensions to specific capability areas and definitions.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Mece Breakdown
13
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Mece Breakdown
14
Figure 5. Uses a 2x2 matrix structure to segment companies based on performance.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Benchmark Gap
15
The slide contains two distinct charts: a radar chart (Figure 6) and a scatter plot (Figure 7).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Benchmark Gap
16
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Benchmark Gap
17
The slide uses two charts (line and lollipop) to demonstrate that high-performing companies maintain higher resilience scores than their low-performing counterpcompare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Benchmark Gap
18
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
19
The slide uses a purple gradient background typical of section dividers in consulting decks.transition
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Pattern Hunter
20
Figure 10. Data shows a clear correlation between high-tech/high-business capabilities and superior performance.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Pattern Hunter
21
The slide highlights the synergy between digital investment and talent strategy.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Pattern Hunter
22
The slide uses two distinct visualizations: a grouped bar chart for aggregate industry performance and a heatmap/bar combo for granular dimension-based resiliencompare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Pattern Hunter
23
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · So What Cascade
24
recommend
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · So What Cascade
25
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · So What Cascade
26
The slide provides context for the research methodology used throughout the deck.summarize
27
The chart is a stacked bar chart representing percentile distributions (Top 25%, Median, Bottom 25%) for different industries.analyze_data
28
The chart is a bubble-based confusion matrix where the diagonal represents correct classifications.quantify_impact
30
front_matter