slides · global inventory
All filtered slides
Global slide inventory for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Corpus coverage
319,975 slides
319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.
- Total slides
- 319,975
- Described
- 319,974
- Pending
- 1
100%ready for canon
Slide type composition
dynamicclickable
Slide type
Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages
+Context & problem43,76713.7% · 6,592 docs+Data & charts72,62022.7% · 8,666 docs+Meta & navigation45,93614.4% · 9,739 docs+Recommend & act67,04121.0% · 9,324 docs+Cases & evidence31,2569.8% · 6,067 docs+Frameworks2,1230.7% · 1,232 docs+Appendix35,68211.2% · 6,614 docs+Other21,5496.7% · 5,566 docs
Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.
all document kinds · all orientations
Slide collection
13,891-13,920 of 319,975
11
The slide uses a McKinsey & Company branding style with a high-quality construction site photo.Reinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
The R-squared value of 0.16 indicates a very weak correlation, suggesting that productivity is not the sole driver of profitability in this sector.Reinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
The slide uses a two-column list format to contrast the roles of government as policymakers versus owners.Reinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
Reinventing Construction Higher ProductivityReinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
01
Technology Mineral CriticalityTechnology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
02
The diagram uses a nested box structure to show how Technology and Financing are positioned within the broader context of Demand, Supply, and Political/Responsibility factors.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
03
Technology Mineral CriticalityTechnology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
04
The slide uses two line charts to show production trends indexed to 1980, highlighting growth rates before and after the 1991 technology inflection point.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
05
The slide uses a map-based layout to present regional data tables, with a list of five key socio-economic drivers on the left.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
06
The chart uses a scatter plot approach on a 2x2 grid. The legend indicates 'Most important driver' categories.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
07
The data represents commodity lifetimes based on current economically viable reserves.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
08
The slide contrasts the geographic distribution of existing mines with the concentration of exploration capital.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
09
The slide uses a combination of a line chart for revenue and a stacked bar chart for investment components (Capex, Asset M&A, Corporate M&A).Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
10
The slide uses a structured table format to compare strategic options for capacity expansion.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
Technology Mineral CriticalityTechnology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
The slide uses a line chart for historical mining productivity and a bar chart for cross-industry OEE comparison.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
The matrix uses color-coded dots to indicate the scope of commodity applicability (single, group, or most).Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
The slide uses a 'Situation vs Impact' framework to demonstrate the value of the 'McKinsey Rapid Yield Boost' approach.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
The chart is a waterfall-style representation of cumulative impact.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
16
Technology Mineral CriticalityTechnology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Jobs To Be Done1 hit
17
Technology Mineral CriticalityTechnology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Jobs To Be Done1 hit
18
Includes specific assumptions about Grasberg and Escondida mines in the footer.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Jobs To Be Done1 hit
19
The slide uses dual line charts to illustrate demand growth, with callout bubbles indicating the scale of impact relative to current demand and mine output.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Jobs To Be Done1 hit
20
The slide uses a custom legend for likelihood (pie charts) and price impact (arrows).Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Jobs To Be Done1 hit
21
Technology Mineral CriticalityTechnology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
22
The chart uses an indexed scale (2000=100) to compare growth rates across three different commodities.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
23
The slide uses a red dashed box to highlight the period of significant cost adjustment around 2015.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
24
The slide uses a table-like structure to map specific technologies to quantitative outcomes and a descriptive case study for remote operations.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
25
The chart is a waterfall-style visualization showing a demand range and a supply figure with a gap.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
26
The slide uses a comparative table structure with embedded bar charts to visualize the impact of different scrap intensity scenarios.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit