slides · global inventory
Disclaimer
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 41,127
Current window 3,181-3,210
Pages 1,371
Rows per page 30
Component
3,181-3,210 of 41,127
19
The slide serves as a disclaimer/limitation for the scaling model presented in the deck.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
20
The table includes a footnote regarding Hærens kapaciteter (Army capabilities) and their cost variations.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
23
The slide uses a 4-point pie-chart icon scale to represent levels of obstacles.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
46
The slide outlines a major reorganization (Nyordning) of the Danish Army, detailing current vs. future structures and efficiency gains.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Build Up1 hit
62
The slide outlines a specific efficiency proposal (Effektiviseringsforslag: 19) for the Danish military.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Build Up1 hit
82
The slide uses a structured table format to present a business case for insourcing. It includes a small pie chart icon in the 'Realiserbarhed' section.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Build Up1 hit
121
The table includes rows for specific operational areas, overlaps, total net potential, average percentage, investments, and final net potential excluding investments.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Waterfall Value1 hit
123
The chart displays FTE reductions across three categories: Operative, IT/Material, and Administrative, with a total column. Data is segmented by year and estimate level.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
124
The chart shows negative values for 'Civile' and positive values for the other three categories, indicating a conversion or shift in roles.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
125
The chart highlights that most reductions occur at middle management (M2xx) and leadership levels. Data is split into low and high estimates.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
126
The chart compares current structure with two proposed scenarios (low span vs high span) across four job levels.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
135
The table includes rows for specific initiatives (36-45) and summary rows for overlaps and totals.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
159
The slide outlines a three-step logic: estimating representative costs, multiplying by scenario units, and applying time-based phasing profiles.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Zoom In1 hit
162
The slide uses a two-column layout to map excluded capabilities to their specific exclusion criteria.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Zoom In1 hit
164
Includes a footnote regarding Army capabilities and cost variations based on deployment duration.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
176
The table compares 6 scenarios based on operational days, crew size, and hull count, with associated financial and temporal implications.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
180
The slide contains a large redacted area covering the content of the scenario comparison table.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
181
The slide is redacted; the table structure is visible but the content is blacked out. Includes a disclaimer note at the bottom.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
183
The table compares scenarios 1-7 against a 'current scenario' baseline (Scenario 4).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
40
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast historical findings with future development paths.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
44
The slide uses a two-column structure to contrast the current complex identification process with the potential for future process improvements.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
48
The slide details the implementation timeline and expected revenue contribution for two specific cost-saving initiatives, including a disclaimer about one-off vs. recurring savings.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
63
The slide outlines a linear process flow for spend analysis data preparation.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Maturity Curve1 hit
75
The chart distinguishes between one-time setup costs (light green) and recurring operational costs (dark green).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Maturity Curve1 hit
82
The slide uses a Gantt chart format to map activities against quarters and years, with specific markers for continuous implementation and potential realization.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Maturity Curve1 hit
106
The slide uses a matrix structure to compare IT spending across functional domains and technical layers. It highlights the disparity between centralized (KAKI/ITP) and total IT spending.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
115
The slide uses a comparison table format to contrast two distinct strategic paths.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
122
The slide uses a list-based diagnostic structure to highlight operational inefficiencies.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
123
The slide uses a list-based diagnostic approach to identify organizational pain points in IT project management.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
129
The slide explicitly states that savings levers are not cumulative.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit