ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY? · page 18 of 64
The slide highlights a discrepancy between perceived effectiveness (survey data) and actual CO2 savings (rankings).
Consulting deck · data_table · analyze_data · dense density
Slide locked Sign in to view
Slide schematic 5/7
callout 0/1 chart 1/1 image 1/1 metric 0/1 paragraph 1/1 source-note 1/1 title 1/1
2 without position callout 1 · metric 1
calloutmetric · primary
Components 7
callout bar-horizontal infographic primary paragraph source-note headline
Tools 5
Annotation slide · 75%
Annotated rank/CO2 columns make the gap concrete.
Chart Selection Guide slide · 80%Bars + actual-rank + CO2-saved table juxtapose perception vs reality.
Data Story Arc slide · 70%CO2 saved (tonnes): 58.6*
Unexpected Pattern slide · 70%Top perceived action is rank 7 in actual impact - surprise.
Von Restorff Effect slide · 88%Red circles isolate 'not having a car' and 'one fewer child'.
Metrics 0
∅
No metrics
No metric insight is anchored to this slide.
Frameworks 0
∅
No frameworks
No framework match is anchored to this slide.