What it is
You break the target into its constituent businesses or asset classes, value each separately against pure-play peer multiples, sum the parts, deduct net debt and friction, and divide by share count.
The most-used valuation framework in activist decks — the dominant choice when the thesis is breakup, REIT conversion, or hidden-asset reveal.
When to use
- ✅ Multi-segment business with distinct economics per segment
- ✅ Conglomerate with separable real estate, royalty stream, or franchise component
- ✅ Holding company with non-consolidated stakes
- ✅ The thesis is
theses/breakup-spinoff.mdor includes it - ❌ Single-segment focused operators
- ❌ Highly integrated businesses where peer pure-play multiples don't apply
Methodology
- Identify segments — 2–5 distinct businesses (more becomes a spreadsheet exercise that loses force)
- For each segment, source standalone financials from 10-K segment reporting
- Select peer set of 3–7 pure-play public comparables
- Pick multiple type per segment:
- EV/EBITDA — most common
- EV/Revenue — high-growth or pre-profit segments
- P/E — steady compounders
- P/NAV — REITs, BDCs
- $/asset — natural resources, real estate
- Apply peer median (not max — show range in sensitivity)
- Sum to enterprise value
- Deduct net debt at parent level
- Deduct separation friction (typically 5–10% of equity value)
- Divide by share count
- Compare to current share price
Friction items to model explicitly
- Stranded overhead at OpCo / parent
- Tax leakage if not Section 355 qualified
- Transaction costs (legal, banker, advisory)
- Debt make-whole if existing notes need redemption
- Financing costs of new capital structure at NewCo
Convention: subtract 5–7% of equity value for friction. Pre-empts management's "you ignored separation costs" rebuttal.
Sensitivity tables
Always show range: bear (low multiple) / base (median) / bull (high multiple) per segment. Reader anchors on base; sensitivity proves you considered downside.
Bear Base Bull
Segment A (×) 9.0 11.5 14.0
Segment B (×) 14.0 16.5 19.0
─────────────────────────────────────
Per share $42 $54 $66
Vs. current $40 +5% +35% +65%
Exemplars
- Pershing Square · McDonald's (Nov 2005) — 3-segment SoP (PropCo, FranCo, McOpCo); $46bn real estate, $45–50/share unlock
- Starboard · Darden (Sep 2014) — restaurant + REIT SoP; $67–86 vs. $48
- Trian · DuPont (Feb 2015) — 6-segment industrial SoP
- Trian · PepsiCo (Jul 2013) — snacks/beverages SoP
- Elliott · BHP Billiton (Apr 2017) — DLC + petroleum SoP
- Elliott · Phillips 66 (2025) — refining/midstream/CPChem/JET 4-segment SoP, $183/share
Full list: examples/by_valuation.json → sum_of_parts
See also
patterns/sum-of-parts.md— the rhetorical patternslides/sum-of-parts-reveal-recipe.md— the canonical reveal slidetheses/breakup-spinoff.md— the dominant companion thesisvaluation/precedent-transactions.md— for deal-multiple variants