What it is

You break the target into its constituent businesses or asset classes, value each separately against pure-play peer multiples, sum the parts, deduct net debt and friction, and divide by share count.

The most-used valuation framework in activist decks — the dominant choice when the thesis is breakup, REIT conversion, or hidden-asset reveal.

When to use

  • ✅ Multi-segment business with distinct economics per segment
  • ✅ Conglomerate with separable real estate, royalty stream, or franchise component
  • ✅ Holding company with non-consolidated stakes
  • ✅ The thesis is theses/breakup-spinoff.md or includes it
  • ❌ Single-segment focused operators
  • ❌ Highly integrated businesses where peer pure-play multiples don't apply

Methodology

  1. Identify segments — 2–5 distinct businesses (more becomes a spreadsheet exercise that loses force)
  2. For each segment, source standalone financials from 10-K segment reporting
  3. Select peer set of 3–7 pure-play public comparables
  4. Pick multiple type per segment:
    • EV/EBITDA — most common
    • EV/Revenue — high-growth or pre-profit segments
    • P/E — steady compounders
    • P/NAV — REITs, BDCs
    • $/asset — natural resources, real estate
  5. Apply peer median (not max — show range in sensitivity)
  6. Sum to enterprise value
  7. Deduct net debt at parent level
  8. Deduct separation friction (typically 5–10% of equity value)
  9. Divide by share count
  10. Compare to current share price

Friction items to model explicitly

  • Stranded overhead at OpCo / parent
  • Tax leakage if not Section 355 qualified
  • Transaction costs (legal, banker, advisory)
  • Debt make-whole if existing notes need redemption
  • Financing costs of new capital structure at NewCo

Convention: subtract 5–7% of equity value for friction. Pre-empts management's "you ignored separation costs" rebuttal.

Sensitivity tables

Always show range: bear (low multiple) / base (median) / bull (high multiple) per segment. Reader anchors on base; sensitivity proves you considered downside.

                  Bear    Base    Bull
Segment A (×)      9.0    11.5   14.0
Segment B (×)     14.0    16.5   19.0
─────────────────────────────────────
Per share         $42     $54    $66
Vs. current $40   +5%    +35%   +65%

Exemplars

  • Pershing Square · McDonald's (Nov 2005) — 3-segment SoP (PropCo, FranCo, McOpCo); $46bn real estate, $45–50/share unlock
  • Starboard · Darden (Sep 2014) — restaurant + REIT SoP; $67–86 vs. $48
  • Trian · DuPont (Feb 2015) — 6-segment industrial SoP
  • Trian · PepsiCo (Jul 2013) — snacks/beverages SoP
  • Elliott · BHP Billiton (Apr 2017) — DLC + petroleum SoP
  • Elliott · Phillips 66 (2025) — refining/midstream/CPChem/JET 4-segment SoP, $183/share

Full list: examples/by_valuation.jsonsum_of_parts

See also

  • patterns/sum-of-parts.md — the rhetorical pattern
  • slides/sum-of-parts-reveal-recipe.md — the canonical reveal slide
  • theses/breakup-spinoff.md — the dominant companion thesis
  • valuation/precedent-transactions.md — for deal-multiple variants