What it is
You apply multiples derived from comparable historical M&A transactions to the target's relevant financial metric. Unlike trading-multiple comparison (which uses public-market valuations), precedent-transaction multiples include control premiums.
The dominant framework when the thesis is sale of company, or when arguing the public-market discount underestimates the strategic / take-out value.
When to use
- ✅ Thesis is
theses/sale-of-company.md— sale to strategic or PE - ✅ Sector has had ≥3 comparable transactions in the last 3–5 years
- ✅ Transaction details are public (purchase price, deal multiples, advisor fairness opinions)
- ✅ Buyer universe is reasonably comparable (similar strategics, similar deal size)
- ❌ Avoid if all precedents are >5 years old (regime has changed)
- ❌ Skip if precedents are entirely from distressed sales (multiples artificially low)
- ❌ Don't use as primary if precedents have wildly different deal rationales (financial buyer vs. strategic synergies)
Methodology
- Identify 3–7 precedent transactions:
- Same sector and business model
- Last 3–5 years (more recent = more relevant)
- Mix of strategic and financial buyers
- Public-target deals (private→public is often unverifiable)
- Extract deal multiples from public sources (10-K disclosures, fairness opinions, S-4 filings, financial press)
- Calculate median + range
- Apply median to target's metric for implied take-out price
- Compare to current for premium math
What to extract per transaction
| Field | Source |
|---|---|
| Date announced | Press release |
| Buyer / target | Press release |
| Deal value (equity + EV) | Definitive proxy |
| EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue, EV/EBIT, P/E | S-4 or fairness opinion |
| Premium to undisturbed price (1-day, 30-day) | Press release + market data |
| Strategic vs. financial buyer | Type |
Sensitivity convention
Show median deal multiple + range. Apply median for base case.
Precedent transactions in [sector], 2020-2025:
Date Target Buyer EV/EBITDA 30-day premium
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
2024-09 Co A Strategic 13.2x 42%
2023-04 Co B PE consort 11.8x 35%
2023-11 Co C Strategic 14.5x 48%
2022-06 Co D Strategic 12.1x 38%
2021-10 Co E PE 10.5x 28%
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Median 12.1x 38%
Implied take-out price for [target]:
$X (median) → +Y% over current
Exemplars
- Pershing Square · Allergan-Valeant (Apr 2014) — pharma deal multiples as anchor for take-out valuation; Actavis ultimately bought Allergan at 75% premium
- Starboard · Office Depot (Aug 2013) — office products consolidation precedents
- Marathon Petroleum · Speedway sale (Sep 2019, Elliott push) — convenience-store deal multiples ($21bn ultimate sale)
- Engaged Capital · Outerwall (Feb 2016) — sale-process deal comp anchor
- Various sector-spin precedents in
patterns/precedent-transaction.md
Full list: examples/by_valuation.json → precedent_transactions
See also
patterns/precedent-transaction.md— the rhetorical patterntheses/sale-of-company.md— the dominant companion thesisvaluation/multiple-comparison.md— trading-multiple siblingslides/sum-of-parts-reveal-recipe.md— for layered SoP + precedent-transaction framings