McKinsey Modelling the potential of digitally enabled processes transparency and participation in the NHS

mckinsey-modelling-the-potential-of-digitally-enabled-processes-transparency-and
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

26
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
02
frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
03
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
04
Uses a 'Do/Don't' comparison framework to set project boundaries.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
05
McKinsey & Company slide, page 4.illustrate_case
06
The slide uses a process flow diagram with Roman numerals I-V to sequence the methodology steps.present_framework
07
The chart uses a waterfall-bridge style gap visualization to highlight the £30bn delta.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
08
The slide uses a series of bar charts to compare IT spending across five categories: All IT spend, External, Internal, Data centres/infrastructure, and Telecomscompare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
09
The slide uses a process-flow style diagram to map assets to two primary levers of value creation.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
10
The slide uses a structured grid to map specific technology interventions to financial impact ranges in billions of pounds.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
The chart illustrates the delta between baseline spend growth and modelled impact scenarios.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
The slide uses a 3x3 grid structure to categorize initiatives. The Y-axis represents 'Net opportunity' (High, Medium, Low savings) and the X-axis represents 'Eaprioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Mece Breakdown
13
plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Mece Breakdown
14
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Mece Breakdown
15
The slide uses a baseline scenario for impact estimation. Confidence is represented by yellow circles.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Mece Breakdown
16
The slide uses a traffic light system for confidence levels (green/yellow).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Mece Breakdown
17
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to map investment categories against healthcare sectors.analyze_data
18
The table includes a 'Total' row and provides ranges for several cost categories.analyze_data
19
The table categorizes costs into 'Local training investment' and 'Local adoption investment' for different efficiency levers.analyze_data
20
The chart uses a stacked bar format to illustrate the composition of IT expenditure across different segments of the NHS.quantify_impact
21
The slide uses a 'From-To' framework to articulate the transition for each recommendation.state_next_steps
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
22
state_next_steps
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
23
The slide uses a 'From-To' framework to illustrate the shift required for each recommendation.state_next_steps
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
24
The slide uses a 'From-To' framework to illustrate the desired shift for each recommendation.state_next_steps
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
25
The slide uses a 'before-after' framing for strategic recommendations.state_next_steps
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
26
The slide uses a grid-based framework to categorize digital health interventions.present_framework