mckinsey-evolving-ussas-alpine-domestic-development-system-in-partnership-with-c · consulting-deck
McKinsey Evolving USSAs Alpine Domestic Development System in Partnership with Clubs
161 pages · 2 arc beats · 2 loops
McKinsey Evolving USSAs Alpine Domestic Development System in Partnership with Clubs
mckinsey-evolving-ussas-alpine-domestic-development-system-in-partnership-with-c arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
1102030405060708090100110120130140150160161
Deck intelligence map
2 coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 142 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Problem & Complication 17 slides 100% 17/17 slides 100% 17/17 slides · 83 hits — 0/17 slides
11.8% 2/17 slides 17.6% 3/17 slides 100% 17/17 slides 100% 17/17 slides Solution & Approach 125 slides 100% 125/125 slides 100% 125/125 slides · 600 hits — 0/125 slides
33.6% 42/125 slides · 44 hits 40% 50/125 slides 100% 125/125 slides 100% 125/125 slides Slide inventory
161 every slide · same image gating as the playbook
03
The slide uses a split-layout with a teal sidebar highlighting the core engagement question.frame_problem
06
The slide uses a table to demonstrate the breadth of stakeholder engagement, with callouts providing qualitative context on the respondent pool.summarize
11
The chart uses solid boxes for USSA-affiliated entities and dashed boxes for non-governance calendaring groups.diagnose
12
The chart highlights the lack of coordination between independent 501c3 committees and regional/divisional bodies.present_framework
15
The slide uses a combination of bulleted findings and direct testimonial quotes to validate the pain points.diagnose
16
The slide uses a two-row layout with category labels on the left and detailed bullet points on the right, supplemented by direct quotes.diagnose
17
The slide uses a structured layout with category tags on the left, detailed bullet points in the center, and supporting quotes on the right.diagnose
18
The charts are pie charts representing survey responses from club leaders and coaches.diagnose
21
Uses a before-after-framing approach to illustrate organizational transformation.compare_options
22
The slide uses a grouping mechanism to distinguish between recommendations already in process and those requiring broader support.recommend
23
The chart uses color coding to distinguish between Alpine-only and multi-sport roles, and dashed borders to indicate new or recently filled positions.present_framework
24
The slide uses a table format to define organizational roles and responsibilities.summarize
25
The slide uses a side-by-side comparison structure to map problems to solutions.compare_options
26
The slide uses a structured table format to communicate operational initiatives.present_solution
27
The slide uses a chronological progression framework (Current -> Near-term -> Long-term).present_solution
28
The slide uses a 'B COMMUNICATION' header, suggesting it is part of a larger section.plan_implementation
29
The slide uses a 'From-To' framework to illustrate strategic shifts in communication.compare_options
30
The slide outlines a strategy for data-driven communication targeting.plan_implementation
31
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast considerations with actionable plans.plan_implementation
32
The slide uses a numbered list format to outline specific strategic initiatives.plan_implementation
33
The slide uses a table to map governance best practices to their definitions and lists specific NGBs (Swimming, Gymnastics, Figure Skating, Cycling, Fencing) ascite_precedent
34
The slide uses a custom organizational mapping to show value flow and reporting lines between USSA entities.present_framework
35
The slide uses a table format to compare current definitions against alignment gaps and improvement opportunities.diagnose
36
The slide uses a hierarchical org chart to propose a standardized governance model across regional and divisional bodies.present_framework
37
The slide uses a two-column layout to present governance best practices, with a note on legal compliance and a specific callout for the Eastern region.diagnose
38
The slide uses a structured list format to define governance requirements and mutual obligations.present_solution
39
Includes a 'To be developed' tag in the top right corner.recommend
40
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast the 'Why' and the 'What' of the affiliation agreement, with a callout box for a necessary caveat regarding coach present_solution
41
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke style diagram to show financial flows. The yellow dashed lines and blue solid lines represent different types of fees.frame_problem
42
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke process flow to show how fees currently flow versus how they could be centralized through the USSA NGB system.plan_implementation
45
The slide uses a standard project management phase-gate structure.plan_implementation
49
The chart uses different border styles to distinguish between USSA-affiliated entities and independent calendaring groups.diagnose
50
The slide highlights the lack of coordination between multiple independent 501c3 committees and regional associations.diagnose
51
The slide uses a dashed-box hierarchy to represent the committee structure.present_framework
52
The slide uses a hierarchical box-and-line diagram to represent the governance structure of the USSA Alpine Sport organization.present_framework
53
The slide uses a hierarchical structure to define governance roles and responsibilities.present_framework
54
The slide outlines the organizational structure of a specific regional committee within the USSA framework.present_framework
55
The slide uses a hierarchical structure to show the relationship between the main committee and its sub-committees.present_framework
56
The slide uses a hybrid org chart and list-based data presentation to illustrate governance.present_framework
57
The slide uses a table to contrast regional governance and legal status.compare_options
58
The table compares Eastern, Rocky/Central, and Western regions.compare_options
59
The table uses checkmarks and X marks to denote service availability, with some cells containing specific numerical or descriptive data.compare_options
60
The table highlights regional variations in service offerings, with all divisions organizing races but differing in support for camps, scholarships, and trainincompare_options
61
The table uses a combination of text, checkmarks/crosses, and bar charts to visualize data across regions.analyze_data
64
The chart tracks athletic spending across elite, development, and events categories.quantify_impact
65
The slide uses two pie charts to illustrate the composition of total revenue and the specific composition of member dues.analyze_data
66
Includes callout regarding open positions for 2013.analyze_data
67
The chart displays five revenue categories: Scored athlete dues, Unscored athlete dues, Other membership dues, Race fees, and Other revenue.analyze_data
68
Includes a callout regarding open positions in the Eastern region and a supporting table for per-member spend.analyze_data
69
The slide uses a waterfall-style bridge to connect the Eastern region total to its constituent parts.analyze_data
73
The survey sample size is 795. The geographic distribution is noted to closely match actual membership.analyze_data
74
The slide presents two distinct datasets: a pie chart for certification levels and a bar chart for age groups coached.analyze_data
78
The chart uses a stacked bar format to show 'Somewhat important' and 'Extremely important' ratings for four different objectives.summarize
79
Data based on a survey of 692 clubs.analyze_data
81
The pie chart is linked to the 'Cost' bar in the main chart.diagnose
82
The chart highlights the top 5 challenges within a dotted box.diagnose
83
The chart uses a grouped bar structure to display survey results across five distinct educational categories.analyze_data
85
Survey data from 2013 USSA McKinsey Club Leader and Coach Survey (n=656).summarize
86
Data from 2013 USSA McKinsey Club Leader and Coach Survey.diagnose
89
The chart on the right is a bar chart representing multiple-choice survey responses.diagnose
90
The chart displays 'Somewhat interested' and 'Very interested' segments, with total interest values on the right.analyze_data
92
The slide uses a split layout with a list of findings on the left and supporting testimonials on the right.diagnose
94
The chart uses a stacked bar approach to show the split between positive and negative sentiment for various communication topics.diagnose
95
Data source: 2013 USSA McKinsey Club Leader and Coach Survey.summarize
96
The chart uses a grouped bar chart format to compare preferences across three organizational levels.analyze_data
97
The slide contrasts preferred communication methods with actual usage patterns.analyze_data
98
The chart displays survey results from 748 parents regarding their interest in specific performance-related topics.analyze_data
99
Two pie charts comparing communication preferences from USSA vs. local clubs.summarize
101
The chart uses a 5-point Likert scale to measure perceived value.compare_options
102
The chart displays percentages of coaches (n=976) and their interaction with the newsletter.quantify_impact
103
The slide uses a structured layout with thematic categories on the left and supporting quotes on the right.diagnose
104
The slide uses two pie charts to compare club alignment vs. club support perception.diagnose
105
Likert scale survey data visualized as a diverging stacked bar chart.diagnose
106
Data presented via two pie charts and one stacked bar chart. Sample sizes (n) provided for each question.analyze_data
107
Data presented as percentages from a 2013 USSA McKinsey survey.analyze_data
108
The slide uses a mix of pie charts for overall satisfaction and stacked bar charts for specific functional areas.analyze_data
109
The slide uses a mix of pie charts for overall satisfaction and stacked bar charts for specific functional areas.analyze_data
110
The table details the fragmented nature of costs across USSA, state/divisional, club, and FIS levels.analyze_data
112
The slide uses a clear categorization (A, B, C) and distinguishes between 'in process' and 'requires broader support' initiatives.recommend
114
The chart uses color coding to distinguish between Alpine-only, multi-sport, and new/changed positions.present_solution
115
The slide uses a table format to define organizational roles and responsibilities.summarize
116
Uses a side-by-side comparison structure to map problems to solutions.compare_options
117
The slide uses a structured table format to communicate strategic initiatives for club development.present_solution
118
The slide uses a three-column layout to categorize value propositions by time horizon.present_solution
119
The slide uses a three-column layout to show the evolution of member value propositions.present_solution
121
The slide uses a 'B' label for the section, likely part of a larger communication strategy deck.plan_implementation
122
The slide uses a structured table format to map feedback mechanisms to actionable recommendations.plan_implementation
123
The slide uses a structured table to map communication initiatives to stakeholders and timelines.present_solution
124
The slide uses a combination of a seasonal timeline and a process flow diagram to illustrate the recommendation.present_solution
125
The slide uses a 'From-To' framework to illustrate strategic shifts in communication channels.compare_options
126
The slide uses a B2 section header indicating it is part of a broader communications strategy.plan_implementation
127
The slide uses a central screenshot of a website with callout boxes pointing to specific UI/UX improvements.plan_implementation
128
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast considerations with specific action plans.present_solution
129
The slide outlines a strategic roadmap for governance reform using a federated model.plan_implementation
130
The slide uses a table to map governance categories to their descriptions, followed by a list of organizations studied.compare_options
131
The slide uses a custom organizational/process flow diagram to map responsibilities. It includes a legend for proposed vs. existing structures and reporting linpresent_framework
132
The slide uses a table structure to highlight organizational misalignment. The circular icons represent a qualitative 'degree of alignment' metric.diagnose
133
The slide uses a table to contrast specific organizational mission statements against a call for strategic alignment.compare_options
134
The diagram is a classic flywheel or virtuous cycle model.present_framework
135
The slide uses a structured list format to categorize benefits into five key areas: Direction and alignment, Agility, Role clarity, Fairness, and Risk managemensummarize
136
The slide uses a two-column layout to present six key governance areas (Voting, Terms, Nominations, Representation, Meetings, Quorum) with specific best practicrecommend
137
Slide 136 from a consulting deck regarding USSA governance.present_solution
138
The slide outlines a strategic shift in governance for club certification, moving away from athlete performance metrics toward operational and compliance-based recommend
139
Includes a 'For Discussion' tag and a specific caveat regarding coach education accessibility.present_solution
140
The slide outlines a two-phase implementation strategy for a club ranking system, referencing USA Swimming as a benchmark.present_solution
141
The slide uses a table to map fee types to payment methods and a callout box for the recommended solution.diagnose
142
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke style diagram to map financial flows, highlighting the lack of standardization in fee collection.diagnose
143
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke model to propose centralizing fee collection through the USSA NGB.present_solution
148
The slide uses a dual-column layout to contrast two key organizational dimensions.present_framework
149
The slide uses a visual representation of the federated structure (1 national body, 74 affiliates, 750 clinics).illustrate_case
150
The slide uses a central tension-mapping diagram to contrast perspectives.diagnose
151
The slide uses a directional arrow diagram to show the flow of influence and alignment between central and local levels.present_framework
153
NGB stands for National Governing Body. The slide uses a mix of checkmarks/crosses for qualitative attributes and bar charts/numbers for quantitative data.compare_peers
154
Includes logos for US Ski Team, US Snowboarding, and Free Skiing at the bottom right.illustrate_case
155
The slide uses a 'Best Practices' sidebar and a specific example to demonstrate operational efficiency.illustrate_case
156
The slide uses a circular process diagram to illustrate the feedback loop.illustrate_case
157
The slide uses a pyramid-like structure to visualize organizational hierarchy levels.compare_peers
158
The slide uses a 'Best Practices' vs 'Example' structure to illustrate how to standardize governance.present_framework
159
The slide uses a matrix structure to map organizational levels against functional areas.present_framework
160
The slide uses a real-world example of USA Swimming to demonstrate how to enforce standards through certification and performance transparency.illustrate_case
161
The slide uses a comparison table to show how NGB missions and affiliate missions align across Gymnastics, Figure Skating, Cycling, and Skiing.illustrate_case