April 2015 McKinsey Operational Review BPS Operational Audit

april-2015-mckinsey-operational-review-bps-operational-audit · 2015-04
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

29
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
02
Uses a 'What this work IS vs IS NOT' comparison framework.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
03
Uses a Venn-like diagram to show the intersection of three strategic priorities.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
05
executive_summary
06
The chart uses a waterfall structure to decompose total per-pupil spending into specific functional buckets.analyze_data
07
The slide uses a numbered list format to categorize distinct financial and operational improvement opportunities.size_opportunity
08
The chart uses a dual-axis approach to show the divergence between school count (bars) and student population (line).frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
09
The chart displays a long-tail distribution of school sizes.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
10
The chart is a horizontal bar chart representing individual schools sorted by utilization percentage.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
The slide uses a horizontal bar chart to compare BPS against 17 other districts, with a vertical dashed line indicating the peer average.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
The slide uses external benchmarking to validate financial projections for school consolidation.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
13
The slide uses a table to illustrate the financial impact of school consolidation.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Mece Breakdown
14
present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Mece Breakdown
15
present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Mece Breakdown
16
The slide uses a hierarchical tree structure to decompose total SPED spending.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Mece Breakdown
17
The chart displays classification rates for students referred for testing, highlighting extreme outliers (0% and 100%).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Mece Breakdown
18
The scatter plot shows a weak correlation between FARM (Free and Reduced Meal) rates and SPED classification rates, highlighting that other districts with similanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Mece Breakdown
19
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast the research-based benefits of inclusion with the district's specific implementation roadmap.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Mece Breakdown
20
The slide uses a dual-chart approach to show the relationship between inclusion capacity and budget shifts.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Mece Breakdown
21
The slide uses a 2x2 matrix-like layout to contrast current vs desired states, with connecting lines indicating specific value shifts.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
22
The slide uses a mix of qualitative quotes and quantitative bar charts to illustrate organizational misalignment.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
23
The slide uses a custom organizational layer notation (n to n-4) to represent hierarchy depth.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
24
The chart uses a vertical dashed line to indicate the peer average of 17.3.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
25
plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
26
The slide uses a checkmark system to indicate the fiscal year (FY16, FY17, FY18) or one-time nature of savings for each initiative.analyze_data
28
The slide uses a process flow diagram to illustrate the transition from broad diagnostic work to specific opportunity identification.plan_implementation
29
The slide uses a process flow diagram to show the transition from initial scan to final prioritized list.prioritize