April 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review

april-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review · 2015-04
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

30
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
02
Uses a 'What this work IS vs IS NOT' comparison framework to manage stakeholder expectations.establish_context
03
The diagram is a circular Venn-like representation of three strategic priorities.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
04
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
05
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
06
The chart uses a waterfall structure to decompose the total per-pupil spend of $17,455.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
07
The slide uses a numbered list format to categorize strategic opportunities, each with associated financial impact estimates.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
08
The chart uses a combination of a bar chart for school counts and a line chart for student population to highlight the inefficiency of maintaining fixed costs.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
09
The chart is a descending bar chart representing school capacity distribution.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
10
The chart is a horizontal bar chart representing individual schools sorted by utilization percentage.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
The chart uses a horizontal bar chart to compare ratios, with a vertical dashed line indicating the peer average of 16.3.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
Uses external benchmarking to validate financial projections for school consolidation.cite_precedent
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
13
The slide uses a table to illustrate the financial impact of school consolidation.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
14
The slide uses a flow-like structure to connect savings/liquidation to reinvestment areas.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
15
present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
16
The slide uses a hierarchical tree diagram to decompose the $265m SPED budget.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
17
The chart is a horizontal bar chart showing classification rates by school. The text highlights the implications of this variability.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
18
The slide uses a scatter plot to show the relationship between student disability classification rates and free/reduced meal eligibility across Massachusetts dianalyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
19
establish_context
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
20
The table uses a heatmap-style color coding to indicate cost impact, ranging from red (high cost) to green (cost savings).analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
21
Uses a waterfall-style comparison between current and steady state costs across three distinct scenarios.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
22
Uses a gap analysis approach to contrast current state vs desired state.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
23
The slide uses a mix of qualitative quotes and quantitative survey data to highlight a disconnect between departmental and district-level goal clarity.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
24
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show headcount distribution and a horizontal bar chart for span of control.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
25
The chart highlights Boston (BPS) in a darker blue color compared to the other peers.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
26
The slide uses a structured table-like layout with numbered callout blocks on the left mapping to bulleted action items on the right.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
27
The slide uses a table structure to map specific operational opportunities to fiscal year implementation timelines.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
28
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
29
The slide uses a process flow diagram to illustrate the methodology of the operational review.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
30
The slide uses a process flow diagram to show how a broad scan leads to a narrowed focus.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps