-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working · deck
5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working
220 pages · 4 arc beats · 2 loops
5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working
-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working · 2015-03 arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
1102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220
Deck intelligence map
4 coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 80 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Situation & Context 20 slides 100% 20/20 slides 100% 20/20 slides · 101 hits — 0/20 slides
65% 13/20 slides 35% 7/20 slides 100% 20/20 slides — 0/20 slides
Problem & Complication 20 slides 100% 20/20 slides 100% 20/20 slides · 100 hits — 0/20 slides
25% 5/20 slides · 6 hits 30% 6/20 slides 100% 20/20 slides 20% 4/20 slides Evidence & Proof 20 slides 100% 20/20 slides 100% 20/20 slides · 108 hits — 0/20 slides
20% 4/20 slides 40% 8/20 slides 100% 20/20 slides — 0/20 slides
Impact & Next Steps 20 slides 100% 20/20 slides 100% 20/20 slides · 99 hits — 0/20 slides
20% 4/20 slides 45% 9/20 slides 100% 20/20 slides — 0/20 slides
Slide inventory
220 every slide · same image gating as the playbook
02
Uses a 'What this work IS vs IS NOT' comparison framework to manage stakeholder expectations.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
03
The diagram is a circular Venn-like representation of three core pillars.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
06
The slide outlines strategic focus areas including facility utilization, special education inclusion, and organizational realignment.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
07
The slide uses checkmarks to indicate when savings are realized across FY16, FY17, FY18, and one-time events.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
08
The chart uses a waterfall-style breakdown to illustrate the allocation of the $17,455 total per pupil spend.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
09
The slide uses a structured layout with four primary opportunity areas on the left and corresponding key facts on the right.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
10
The slide uses a 2x2 matrix-like layout to contrast 'experienced' vs 'desired' values, with arrows highlighting the shift in perception for 'Bureaucracy' and 'Aanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
11
The chart uses a combination of a bar chart for school counts and a line chart for student population to illustrate the mismatch.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
12
The slide uses a table to present financial impact analysis of school consolidation.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
13
The slide uses a causal flow structure (savings/sales leading to reinvestment outcomes).present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
14
The slide uses a hierarchical tree diagram to decompose the budget.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
15
The chart displays individual school classification rates, highlighting extreme outliers (0% and 100%).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
16
The slide uses a scatter plot to show that Boston has high SPED rates despite having similar or lower socioeconomic challenges (FARM rates) compared to other dianalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
17
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast the research-based benefits of inclusion with the operational plan for implementation.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
18
The slide uses a dual-chart layout to show the relationship between classroom capacity and budget shifts over a 13-year period.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
19
The slide uses a two-column layout to map specific opportunities to their corresponding decision requirements.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
21
The slide uses a structured table format to contrast descriptive overviews with key strategic insights across four domains.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
22
The slide uses a pie chart to visualize budget allocation percentages.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
23
System Overview slide showing budget allocation by category.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
24
The chart uses a tree-like structure to decompose total budget into specific line items.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
25
The slide highlights that ARRA and grant funding have limited flexibility.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
26
The slide uses two waterfall charts to illustrate budget components, with a pie chart showing the high-level split.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
27
The slide uses a visual metaphor of a school building to categorize staff and operational costs.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
28
Includes two distinct charts: a state-level bar chart and a district-level comparison point.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
29
The chart uses a waterfall-style visualization to decompose total per-pupil spending into functional categories.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
30
The slide uses a hierarchical tree structure to decompose total SPED spending.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
31
The chart uses a dual-axis approach to show budget (bars) and student population (line).frame_problem
32
The chart combines a stacked bar chart (FTEs) with a line chart (student population).analyze_data
33
The slide includes a callout box explaining the recent shift in shares.analyze_data
34
The slide uses stacked bar charts to compare racial composition and simple bar charts for poverty indicators, accompanied by a summary list of key takeaways.analyze_data
35
Includes a bar chart of state-level data and a stacked bar chart of district-type distribution.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
36
The slide uses a dual-chart layout to compare national state-level data with local district-level data.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
37
Includes a trend line and specific callouts for outlier districts.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
38
The chart highlights a 10% growth in Boston's ELL population, representing a raw increase of 7,656 students.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
41
The slide uses NAEP TUDA data to compare Boston Public Schools (BPS) against national and large city averages.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
42
The slide uses NAEP TUDA data to track longitudinal performance trends.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
43
The slide highlights a persistent performance gap between BPS and the state, with a slight narrowing trend by 10th grade.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
44
The slide uses four line charts to demonstrate a persistent performance gap.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
45
The slide uses line charts to show longitudinal performance trends. The callout box summarizes the key takeaway regarding BPS ELL performance relative to state analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
46
The slide uses line charts to compare performance trends over time (2000-2014) for different student demographics.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
47
The slide uses scatter plots with trend lines to demonstrate a negative correlation between SWD share and performance, specifically calling out Boston as an outanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
48
The slide uses a scatter plot with a trend line to demonstrate that Boston (BPS) performs above the expected regression line for its ELL population size.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
49
The chart shows a persistent gap between BPS and the state average, despite both showing upward trends.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
50
Includes both bar charts for Likert-scale responses and a horizontal bar chart for average scores, alongside qualitative testimonials.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
52
The slide uses two bar charts to visualize teacher age and evaluation status, supplemented by key statistics in callout boxes.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
53
The slide includes a 'DRAFT' watermark and proprietary footer.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
55
The chart highlights Boston (BPS) in a darker blue color compared to the other peer cities.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
56
The chart uses a dual-axis approach to show FTEs (bars) and student population (line).frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
58
The slide uses a standard project management timeline structure to delineate phases from data collection to opportunity development.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
60
The slide uses a color-coded legend (red triangle, yellow diamond, green triangle) to categorize findings, though only the yellow diamond is used in the main tasummarize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
61
The slide uses a color-coded legend (red triangle, yellow diamond, green triangle) to indicate status for each functional area.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
63
The slide uses a simple binary categorization framework to prioritize initiatives.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
64
The matrix uses a color-coded system (Green, Yellow, Grey) to categorize initiatives into Quick Wins, Long-term goals, and Not a priority.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
65
The slide uses icons 'e' for efficiency and '$' for financial opportunities.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
66
The slide uses icons for 'Efficiency opportunity' (e) and 'Financial opportunity' ($).prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
67
The slide uses icons 'e' for efficiency and '$' for financial opportunities.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
70
The slide uses two bar charts to contrast operational efficiency (cost per meal) with revenue performance (costs as % of revenue).compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
72
RFP 25, DRAFT status, includes budget and opportunity type metadata.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
73
RFP 25, slide 72. Includes financial data points for FY14.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
74
The chart uses a grouped bar format to show year-over-year change for multiple cities.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
75
Includes RFP reference and financial context.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
76
The slide uses horizontal bar charts to compare Boston (orange) against other districts (blue).compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
78
The slide uses a line chart to show performance improvement and a horizontal bar chart to show cost benchmarking.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
79
The chart uses bubble size to represent transportation spending per student, with Boston (BPS) shown as a large dark blue bubble.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
80
The slide outlines specific financial opportunities related to over-identification, staffing ratios, private placement, and transportation.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
81
The chart highlights a 21% variance for BPS compared to peers.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Pattern Hunter
83
The slide uses a structured layout to contrast current state (strengths/challenges) with future opportunities.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Pattern Hunter
85
The slide uses a color-coded legend (red triangle, yellow diamond, green triangle) to categorize performance, though only the yellow diamond is used in this spesummarize
86
The slide uses a color-coded legend (red, yellow, green) to categorize organizational areas.analyze_data
88
The slide uses a red triangle icon to denote 'Challenge' status for the 'Performance management' category.summarize
89
The slide uses a qualitative rating system (Stable, with opportunity) to categorize administrative functions.analyze_data
90
The slide uses a color-coded legend (red, yellow, green) to indicate status, though only yellow is used on this specific slide.analyze_data
92
The slide uses a structured layout to contrast strengths and challenges, followed by a section on potential improvements.summarize
93
The slide uses a structured layout to contrast strengths and challenges, followed by a forward-looking opportunity section.frame_problem
95
The slide uses a structured layout to contrast strengths and challenges in school-level recruiting.summarize
96
The slide uses a structured layout to contrast strengths and challenges, followed by identified opportunities for improvement.frame_problem
99
RFP 25 context; mentions BPS (Boston Public Schools) reliance on paper-based systems.frame_problem
101
The slide contrasts school-based vs non-school based partnerships and identifies a systemic issue in partnership management.frame_problem
102
RFP 25 context; mentions BPS (Boston Public Schools) and City of Boston payroll audits.frame_problem
104
RFP 25 context; highlights the disconnect between declining enrollment and static building footprint.frame_problem
105
RFP 25; mentions BPS (Boston Public Schools) and CAO (Chief Academic Officer).frame_problem
107
Includes a callout box suggesting that the downward trend allows for proactive police involvement.analyze_data
110
The slide uses a structured table format to map problem descriptions to proposed deep-dive methodologies.present_solution
113
The slide outlines a problem-solution framework regarding school district capacity.summarize
114
The chart highlights a significant drop in enrollment since the 1970s and contrasts this with projected population growth in Boston.frame_problem
115
The chart shows a slight increase followed by a plateau, with a specific callout regarding the net change in schools since 1994.analyze_data
116
The chart illustrates a long-tail distribution of school sizes by physical capacity.size_opportunity
117
The chart is a waterfall-style bar chart representing individual school utilization rates.analyze_data
118
The slide uses a dual-line projection model (best/worst case) to illustrate future facility needs.frame_problem
119
The slide uses a peer benchmark to argue for potential cost savings through operational efficiency.compare_peers
120
The slide uses a house metaphor to represent a school, with internal staff and operational costs mapped to specific budget line items.analyze_data
121
The slide uses a table to present a financial impact analysis of school consolidation.analyze_data
122
The slide uses peer benchmarking to establish credibility for financial projections.compare_peers
123
The slide uses a table format to map potential gains to their descriptions.summarize
124
The slide uses a waterfall chart to show cumulative savings from three sets of school closures, totaling ~35M.size_opportunity
125
The slide uses a simple two-box flow diagram to connect property value realization to reinvestment goals.present_solution
126
The slide uses a causal flow structure (left side: financial inputs; right side: programmatic outputs).present_solution
127
Uses a case study approach to illustrate successful resource concentration strategies.cite_precedent
128
The slide uses a process-flow diagram to show how three distinct criteria lead to a unified decision-making framework.frame_problem
130
The slide outlines cost drivers (classrooms, transportation, private tuition) and the financial impact of a 12-year inclusion transition plan.summarize
131
The slide contrasts national trends with specific BPS budget data points.frame_problem
132
The slide uses a hierarchical tree diagram to decompose the $265m total special education budget.analyze_data
133
The slide uses a checkmark matrix to illustrate the relationship between spending categories and cost levers.analyze_data
135
Includes two bar charts: one for state-level data and one for district-level data (Boston vs MA average).compare_peers
136
The chart uses a scatter plot to visualize the correlation between socioeconomic status and special education designation.analyze_data
137
The chart uses a horizontal bar chart to compare individual school referral rates against the district average of 2.8%.analyze_data
138
The chart is a horizontal bar chart showing classification rates by school, grouped by school level (HS, MS, ES).analyze_data
140
The chart compares BPS data from 2012-2015 against Massachusetts state data from 2013-2014.analyze_data
141
The slide uses a structured table to contrast current staffing inefficiencies with potential strategic shifts.frame_problem
142
The slide uses a structured table format to present policy-based cost-saving and service-improvement opportunities.present_solution
144
The chart shows a clear outlier distribution, with some schools having very high percentages of students requiring specialized transport.analyze_data
145
The slide highlights inefficiencies in bus routing and provides context on student transportation logistics.analyze_data
146
The slide uses a dual bar chart comparison to highlight inefficiency in student transportation for special education.analyze_data
149
The slide highlights specific departments (DCF, DYS, DMH) and legal/administrative triggers for student placements.analyze_data
151
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast the research-based benefits of inclusion with the operational plan for implementation.present_solution
152
Includes a disclaimer box regarding the accuracy of the cost/benefit analysis.summarize
153
The chart illustrates a phased implementation strategy for special education inclusion, segmented by network.plan_implementation
154
The slide highlights that short-term costs are high due to the need for new paraprofessionals and specialists, with no immediate cost savings expected.analyze_data
155
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show FTE growth and a data table to show the corresponding financial impact over time.analyze_data
156
The chart illustrates a transition from high-cost separate classrooms to lower-cost inclusion models, showing a crossover point where savings exceed costs.analyze_data
158
The slide provides a high-level synthesis of findings from surveys, interviews, and org chart analysis.summarize
159
The slide uses a pyramid structure to analyze organizational health, specifically focusing on span of control (direct reports) and layer distribution.analyze_data
161
The slide uses a gap analysis approach to contrast current organizational culture with desired future state.analyze_data
162
The slide uses qualitative quotes alongside quantitative survey data to illustrate a disconnect between departmental and district-level goal clarity.analyze_data
163
Includes a direct quote from a Cabinet Department leader illustrating the disconnect between data collection and strategic use.analyze_data
164
The slide uses a mix of qualitative quotes and quantitative survey results to illustrate organizational fragmentation.frame_problem
165
Includes survey data visualization and direct quotes from Cabinet Department leaders.frame_problem
166
The slide uses a simple bulleted list to contrast benefits for two distinct stakeholder groups.summarize
168
The slide uses a structured table format to present operational improvement opportunities.analyze_data
170
The slide uses two horizontal bar charts to compare performance metrics across districts, with 'Boston' highlighted in yellow.compare_peers
171
Includes a pie chart showing percentage breakdown and a stacked bar chart showing dollar amounts in millions.analyze_data
172
The slide uses a series of bar charts to compare total costs, student populations, and cost per student.analyze_data
173
The slide uses a horizontal bar chart for peer benchmarking and a grouped bar chart for site-specific participation.compare_peers
174
The chart is a horizontal bar chart showing individual school participation rates against a district average (Ø 67).analyze_data
176
The slide uses a waterfall chart to decompose total PD spending into specific categories, highlighting fragmentation.frame_problem
177
The slide uses a stacked bar chart for usage and a pie chart for category distribution.analyze_data
179
The chart is a pie chart with labels and values indicating budget allocation in millions of dollars.analyze_data
180
The slide uses a combination of stacked bar charts and a bulleted list to summarize operational inefficiencies in BPS transportation.analyze_data
181
The slide uses a simple two-row table to categorize opportunities.size_opportunity
183
The slide uses a comparison table to highlight potential financial savings from operational changes.size_opportunity
188
The slide uses a two-column layout to link problems (constraints) to solutions (policy changes).present_solution
189
The slide shows a 'Master School List' concept with various sub-analyses (demand, performance, district output).analyze_data
190
The slide uses a simple linear process flow to describe a financial model.present_framework
191
The slide uses a circular process flow to represent stakeholder engagement steps.plan_implementation
192
The slide uses a vertical gradient arrow to denote formality levels for 1-way communication.present_framework
193
The slide uses a spectrum-based framework to define channel characteristics.present_framework
194
The slide uses a matrix-style timeline layout to track two workstreams over six months.plan_implementation
196
The chart uses a horizontal bar format to show the distribution of classification rates, with a specific callout for the 100% outlier group.frame_problem
197
The slide title mentions 34 schools, but the body text lists 35 schools. The chart is a histogram showing the distribution of classification rates.frame_problem
198
The slide uses a structured approach to categorize research actions based on school classification rates (lowest, highest, and standardization).plan_implementation
199
The slide outlines a research framework for improving special education classification and student outcomes.plan_implementation
201
The slide uses a table structure to map strategic initiatives against time horizons (short-term vs long-term).plan_implementation
202
The slide uses a matrix-style timeline layout to map specific tasks across 6 time-buckets (2-month intervals).plan_implementation
205
The slide uses a comparison table format to map specific actions to their strategic importance.plan_implementation
206
Uses a process-flow diagram to contrast ideal KPI criteria with current departmental measurement issues.frame_problem
207
The slide uses the SMART framework to guide KPI development, emphasizing the need for a limited number of metrics.present_framework
208
The slide outlines the purpose, organizational structure, and key activities of a proposed KPI team.present_solution
209
The slide uses a mapping framework to align organizational challenges with specific transformation unit functions.plan_implementation
210
The slide uses a 3-column comparison matrix to define organizational roles and conditions for success.present_framework
211
The slide uses a table structure to define competency requirements.present_framework
212
The chart combines a stacked bar chart for FTE counts (Central office vs Schools) and a line chart for student population.analyze_data
214
The slide uses a comparative bar chart to demonstrate that students moved to 'welcoming schools' ended up in higher-performing academic environments than their illustrate_case
215
The slide uses a structured case study format to highlight operational and communication strategies during a period of district contraction.illustrate_case
216
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast the 'Context' of the school closures with the 'How did they do it?' implementation details.illustrate_case
217
The slide uses a chronological structure on the left and a pros/cons comparison on the right to frame the policy conflict.frame_problem
218
The slide uses case studies of three cities to derive lessons for Boston Public Schools (BPS).cite_precedent
219
The slide uses a funnel diagram to illustrate the filtering process based on enrollment, location, socioeconomic status, and school size.compare_peers
220
The slide includes a small callout box at the bottom detailing focus group participation numbers.appendix