HashiCorp | Investor Presentation Deck | 60 slides

HashiCorp · 2022-05
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 0 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

1
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 60 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Whole deck 60 slides 100% 60/60 slides 100% 60/60 slides · 227 hits
0/60 slides
21.7% 13/60 slides · 14 hits 33.3% 20/60 slides
0/60 slides
0/60 slides

Slide inventory

60
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
02
Page number 2 in the bottom right corner.other
03
The slide features a layered isometric diagram representing the HashiCorp product stack and its integration with cloud infrastructure.establish_context
04
inspire_vision
05
The slide uses an isometric stack diagram to represent the layers of their technology stack.establish_context
06
summarize
07
Includes detailed footnotes regarding Non-GAAP financial measures.show_traction
08
The slide uses a list-based layout with icons to highlight four distinct areas of business growth.show_traction
09
The slide uses a flow diagram to show the transition from open source to two distinct delivery models.present_solution
10
summarize
11
Uses a process flow diagram to illustrate the transition from static to dynamic infrastructure.establish_context
12
Uses a comparison table/timeline hybrid to contrast legacy vs modern infrastructure paradigms.frame_problem
13
The diagram shows a flow from applications to infrastructure, mapping specific functional needs (Connect, Secure, Provision) to specific HashiCorp tools.present_solution
14
The slide uses a layered diagram to show how HashiCorp products abstract away underlying cloud providers (AWS, Azure, GCP).present_solution
15
Includes a diagram showing Terraform core connecting cloud provider services to operations templates.present_solution
16
Includes a diagram of the Vault architecture and a challenge/solution summary for a specific customer.illustrate_case
17
The slide uses a diagram to illustrate a multi-cloud/hybrid-cloud architecture.illustrate_case
18
The slide uses a visual progression from scattered icons to a layered stack to represent increasing complexity and integration.plan_implementation
19
The slide uses a process flow diagram to bridge development and operations.present_solution
20
The slide uses a stepped timeline to illustrate the progression of customer engagement.plan_implementation
21
The slide uses a layered architecture diagram to contrast legacy vendors with modern cloud-native alternatives.compare_peers
22
The slide uses a vertical timeline-style list with icons to indicate progress or focus areas.transition
23
The chart uses a waterfall-style layout to show the composition of the $72.5B HashiCorp TAM.size_opportunity
24
The slide uses a vertical timeline-style list with icons to highlight four key business strengths.summarize
25
The slide uses a circular flywheel metaphor to represent business strategy.present_framework
26
The chart demonstrates consistent, long-term community adoption growth.show_traction
27
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to show the central role of HashiCorp products in an enterprise infrastructure.present_solution
28
The x-axis labels for FY2020 appear to be repeated incorrectly in the source image, but the data represents a continuous quarterly progression.show_traction
29
show_traction
30
The slide uses a vertical timeline-like visual to list four key value propositions.summarize
31
The slide uses a stepped timeline to illustrate product lifecycle stages.plan_implementation
32
present_solution
33
transition
34
Uses icons to represent each pillar in a vertical list format.summarize
35
Uses a nested box visualization to represent market segments.size_opportunity
36
The chart displays quarterly customer counts, demonstrating consistent growth over time.show_traction
37
The slide uses a stacked area chart to represent product adoption and expansion over a customer journey timeline.present_framework
38
The chart is a waterfall-style bar chart showing ARR growth over time, with product logos indicating the expansion of the commercial footprint.show_traction
39
The chart illustrates the expansion of product usage (Nomad, Terraform, Vault) within a single enterprise account over time.show_traction
40
The chart uses a stair-step visualization to represent ARR growth.show_traction
41
The slide includes a detailed revenue model formula and footnotes defining the metrics used.show_traction
42
transition
43
The slide displays both annual totals and a granular quarterly breakdown to demonstrate consistent growth.show_traction
44
The chart tracks NDRR over six consecutive quarters across three fiscal years.show_traction
45
The chart highlights a 67% recognition rate for Q1 FY2023 RPO within one year.analyze_data
46
The chart displays a clear upward trend in quarterly subscription revenue.show_traction
47
The slide displays consistent high gross margins, with a slight upward trend in recent quarters.analyze_data
48
Includes a reconciliation footnote and page number 48.analyze_data
49
front_matter
50
The table provides a detailed breakdown of non-GAAP financial performance metrics over time.analyze_data
51
Includes quarterly and annual breakdowns for S&M, R&D, and G&A expenses.analyze_data
52
The table provides a detailed breakdown of operating expenses from FY2020 through Q1 FY2023.analyze_data
53
Includes footnotes explaining stock-based compensation adjustments and share count methodology.analyze_data
54
Includes quarterly and annual breakdowns for revenue, gross profit, and operating loss.analyze_data
55
The table shows the adjustment of GAAP RPOs by adding customer deposits to arrive at Non-GAAP RPOs.analyze_data
56
The table includes TTM (Trailing Twelve Months) data for FY2020, FY2021, FY2022, and Q1 FY2023.analyze_data
58
The diagram uses a hub-and-spoke visual to represent the core platform and its three primary revenue drivers.present_solution
59
The diagram uses a nested box structure to represent increasing levels of service and support.present_framework
60
front_matter