Granite Ridge | SPAC Presentation Deck | 30 slides

Granite Ridge Resources · 2022-05
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

6
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

30
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
05
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction
06
Includes a capitalization table and a dividend yield sensitivity table based on redemption scenarios.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction
07
The slide uses a combination of a strategic pillar framework and a KPI dashboard.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
08
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to show the parent company (Granite Ridge) and its five regional asset segments.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
09
The charts are waterfall-style plots showing IRR decay across gross inventory count.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
10
The slide includes a detailed breakdown of production, revenue, expenses, and debt metrics for the 2022 fiscal year.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Market Size
11
The chart illustrates sensitivity of cumulative FCF to oil price scenarios, showing how excess cash is available for growth.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Market Size
12
The slide uses a dual-axis chart to compare base and variable dividends against UFCF yield for peers.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Market Size
13
The slide uses bar charts to position the company (labeled 'GR') relative to a peer group of 10 companies.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
14
The slide uses a comparison table format to highlight competitive advantages in growth, leverage, yield, and cost structure.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
15
The slide uses a funnel-like progression to show how the peer group narrows based on financial criteria, highlighting Granite Ridge's consistent valuation advancompare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
16
The slide outlines the operational division of labor between two entities.present_framework
17
Includes a skills matrix for the Board of Directors.other
Open slide detailBeat · TeamLoop · Golden Circle
18
The slide uses a funnel chart to illustrate the conversion from initial screening to closed deals.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · TeamLoop · Golden Circle
19
The slide highlights the 'non-operated' (non-op) business model strategy.show_traction
20
The slide uses a checkmark matrix to demonstrate ESG alignment across peer operators.compare_peers
21
summarize
23
Includes a footnote detailing the pricing assumptions used for the reserve estimates.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
24
The slide uses arrows to link specific line items to explanatory notes regarding deal structure and lock-up periods.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
25
The slide uses a comparison table to demonstrate the alignment of interests in an ENPC structure compared to a traditional SPAC.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
26
The slide presents two distinct tables: one for equity value/yield and one for ownership percentage, both indexed by redemption level.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
27
Includes a specific note regarding sponsor share release conditions based on VWAP.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
28
The slide displays two stacked bar charts representing hedging volumes (Bopd for oil, MMBtud for gas) over time, with price ranges annotated within the bars.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
29
Represents aggregate of Grey Rock Fund I, II and III prior to pro forma adjustments for ENPC.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials