Grab | Results Presentation Deck | 41 slides

Grab · 2022-03
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

41
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Attention
02
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Attention
03
other
Open slide detailBeat · Attention
04
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Attention
05
The slide uses a three-column layout with imagery representing each priority.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Attention
06
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Need
07
The slide highlights strong YoY growth across GMV, GMV per MTU, and Deliveries GMV.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Need
08
The slide uses a three-column layout to present key growth metrics.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Need
09
The slide highlights a performance beat on GMV, with actuals exceeding the outlook range.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Need
10
The chart uses a color gradient to distinguish the recovery period in Q4 2021.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · NeedLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
The chart highlights a recovery trend, noting that Dec-21 MTUs are at the highest level since Mar-20.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
Data compares Q4 2021 vs Q4 2020 across Singapore, Indonesia, Vietnam, Philippines, Thailand, and Malaysia.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
13
Data source: Euromonitor. Scope: Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Philippines, and Vietnam.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
14
The slide uses a before-after framing to demonstrate the business impact of cross-selling services within the Superapp ecosystem.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
15
The table uses a stair-step visualization to highlight cohort maturity.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
16
The chart uses an indexed comparison where Grab is set to 100% in Dec-2021, and the percentage labels represent the efficiency advantage of Grab over the competcompare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
17
The chart combines a bar chart for AOV and a line chart for Transactions per MTU.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
18
The chart uses a dual-line graph to show the gap in incentive spending, with annotations highlighting the magnitude of the difference.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
19
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
20
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
21
summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
22
establish_context
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
23
establish_context
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
24
transition
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
25
Includes detailed footnotes defining metrics and non-IFRS adjustments.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
26
Includes detailed footnotes defining metrics like GMV, MTUs, and EBITDA adjustments.analyze_data
27
The table includes YoY percentage point changes for both quarterly and full-year periods.analyze_data
28
Uses a waterfall-style bridge logic to reconcile non-IFRS metrics to IFRS net loss.analyze_data
29
The table subtracts loans and borrowings from cash liquidity to arrive at net cash liquidity.analyze_data
30
The slide uses a consistent color scheme (light green for 2020, dark green for 2021) to compare year-over-year performance.analyze_data
31
Includes footnotes defining GMV, Commission Rate, and Segment Adjusted EBITDA.analyze_data
32
The slide compares Q4 2020 and Q4 2021 metrics across three key financial indicators.analyze_data
33
The slide shows a significant increase in GMV (+127% YoY) alongside a decrease in Segment Adjusted EBITDA (-74% YoY).analyze_data
34
The table includes a footnote regarding unaudited status and GMV definition.analyze_data
35
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Action
36
The slide provides specific GMV and TPV ranges for Q1 2022 and a qualitative growth expectation for Q2-Q4 2022.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Action
37
The slide uses a 2x2 grid layout to present financial targets and timelines.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Action
38
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Action
39
The table uses parentheses to denote negative values (losses or credits).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
40
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Action
41
The table provides a breakdown of incentive costs in millions, with footnotes defining the categories.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action