Advent | SPAC Presentation Deck | 45 slides

Advent · 2020-10
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 3 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

45
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
04
Includes headshots of key leadership from both companies.summarize
05
Uses a puzzle piece metaphor to represent the company's role in the market.summarize
06
transition
07
summarize
08
The slide uses a contrast-based layout to position Advent as a superior alternative to traditional hydrogen infrastructure.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
09
The slide uses a wireframe illustration of a truck to map specific technology components (Fuel Tank, Reformer, Fuel Cell, Battery) to their functions.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
10
The slide uses a visual comparison table to contrast infrastructure requirements and costs for Renewable/Low-Carbon Fuels vs Hydrogen vs Battery.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
11
The slide uses a clear 2x2-style grid to categorize products by business model.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
12
The slide uses a value chain framework to demonstrate competitive differentiation.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
13
Uses an analogy to explain the product's role in the value chain.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
14
The slide uses a horizontal timeline structure with four distinct phases: Development/Evolution, Key Partnerships, Market Penetration, and Mass Adoption.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
15
The slide uses a grid layout to categorize customers by industry (Portable Power, Off-Grid, Energy Storage, Aviation, Gas Sensors, Auto, Power Generation).show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
16
Includes a revenue buildup calculation on the right side.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
18
Uses a visual 'pie chart' style indicator to represent benefit levels (least to most).compare_peers
19
The slide uses a grid layout to display headshots and professional summaries for 8 individuals.other
Open slide detailBeat · Team
20
transition
21
The slide uses a 2D scatter-like plot mapped onto a timeline/segmentation framework to justify the need for fuel cells in heavy-duty and long-range applicationsargue_timing
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
22
The radar chart uses five axes to compare performance metrics.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
23
The slide uses a cost-reduction curve (MEA) to bridge the gap between technical capability and market opportunity.size_opportunity
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
24
The chart uses a line graph to illustrate cost curves over time (2021-2025).compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
25
transition
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
26
Uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to show how core technologies branch into different applications.size_opportunity
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
27
transition
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
28
The chart uses a stacked bar approach over a timeline to show revenue growth and composition (Engineering Fees, MEA sales, Licensing fees).present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · VisualizationLoop · Why Now
29
plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · VisualizationLoop · Why Now
30
show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · VisualizationLoop · Why Now
31
The table lists $153.4m total, while the pie chart is labeled $88.5m, suggesting the chart represents a subset or specific phase of the total plan.plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
32
The slide uses a numbered process flow (01-04) to describe the value chain from component to market application.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
33
transition
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
34
The table includes both historical estimates and future projections. The right-hand column provides qualitative context for the financial trajectory.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
35
Includes detailed footnotes explaining the assumptions behind the pro forma figures.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
36
Includes 2021-2023 Revenue CAGR and Market Capitalization data for peers.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
37
The table uses a comparative structure to validate market interest through M&A and partnership activity.cite_precedent
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
38
transition
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
39
summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
40
appendix
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
41
The slide uses a numbered list format to present distinct R&D workstreams.plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
42
The slide uses a table to present quantitative targets from Deloitte/Ballard reports to establish market momentum.argue_timing
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
43
cite_precedent
45
state_next_steps