Bryter | Start Up Pitch Deck | 23 slides

Bryter · 2020-06
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

23
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
02
argue_timing
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
03
Uses a visual metaphor of a person working to distinguish between routine tasks and high-level expertise.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Why Now
04
The slide uses a visual metaphor of a human head to represent the 'unformalized data' (expert knowledge) that is difficult for standard ML to process.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Why Now
05
The chart uses a stacked area representation to show the cumulative layers of automation technology over time.argue_timing
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
06
The slide uses a visual layout to demonstrate the no-code interface and functional modules of the software.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Before After
07
The slide uses a timeline-like process flow to map development stages to the BRYTER platform capabilities.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Before After
08
Uses an analogy (Audi) to describe product quality.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Before After
09
Uses an analogy to AutoCAD to explain the value proposition.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Before After
10
The diagram uses a central horizontal line to represent a digital backbone or workflow, with various departments (Marketing, Legal, IT, etc.) connected to it. Spresent_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Before After
11
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke style diagram to show how various inputs feed into a central logic engine, which then produces various outputs.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Before After
12
The slide uses a visual connector line to show that all these disparate tools are unified by the BRYTER integration.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Before After
13
The slide uses a process flow diagram to show the transition from a compliance team to automated modules and finally to existing IT infrastructure.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Before After
14
The diagram illustrates a hub-and-spoke model where the central platform acts as the bridge between the internal team and external partners.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Before After
15
Uses a conceptual chart to show the 'Required ROI' vs 'Complexity' relationship.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Before After
16
The slide uses a 2x2 matrix to categorize various use cases, contrasting 'Self Servicing' vs 'Project Integration' and 'Form Builders' vs 'Process Automation'.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
17
The chart uses a scatter plot overlay on a 2x2 matrix to show how BRYTER's platform enables use cases that were previously outside the ROI threshold.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
18
present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
19
The slide uses a grid-like layout to categorize different types of applications (e.g., Virtual Assistants, Intake Tools, Rulebook Automation).present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
20
Uses a strikethrough effect to contrast old vs new paradigms.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
21
Uses a hub-and-spoke style diagram to show horizontal platform vs vertical applications.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Market Size
22
Includes headshots, professional bios, and logos of past affiliations and investors.other
Open slide detailBeat · Team
23
state_next_steps