Antero Midstream Partners | Investor Presentation Deck | 41 slides

Antero Midstream · 2018-12
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 0 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

41
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
03
Includes a definition box for company ticker symbols at the bottom.other
04
Includes a map of Antero's acreage in Ohio, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania.quantify_opportunity
05
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
06
The chart combines bar charts for volume and line charts for pricing, illustrating the transition from swaps to collars.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
07
The slide uses a before-after visual comparison to explain a financial restructuring event.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
08
The slide uses a combination of tables and a geographic map to illustrate the financial benefits of specific infrastructure projects.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
09
The slide uses a bridge diagram to illustrate the shift in market exposure between YTD 2018 and 4Q 2018.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
10
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
11
Uses a before-after-bridge framework to show corporate restructuring.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
12
The chart illustrates the variance between 3Q guidance and 4Q actuals/estimates.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
13
Uses a list of chevron-style callouts with directional arrows to indicate performance trends.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
14
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
15
The slide uses two bar charts to establish competitive advantage in both current production volume and future inventory potential.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Market Size
16
The slide uses a dual-chart layout to demonstrate competitive advantage in pricing and margins.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Market Size
17
The chart uses a bridge-like structure to show the delta between 2018 actuals, 2019 base case, and 2019 upside case.quantify_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Not explicitly mentioned but implied in various sections
18
The slide features a photo of the Navigator Aurora ship at the Marcus Hook terminal.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Not explicitly mentioned but implied in various sections
19
The chart illustrates the revenue impact of moving from 2018 actuals to 2019 estimates, highlighting the sensitivity to a $5/Bbl price increase.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Not explicitly mentioned but implied in various sections
20
Includes a map of the US with logistics flows, two tables comparing netbacks, and summary metrics for the ME2 project.quantify_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Not explicitly mentioned but implied in various sections
21
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Not explicitly mentioned but implied in various sections
22
Includes record performance metrics alongside historical annual data.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Not explicitly mentioned but implied in various sections
23
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Not explicitly mentioned but implied in various sections
24
The slide uses a checkmark list to highlight value propositions and a geographic map to illustrate operational footprint.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Not explicitly mentioned but implied in various sections
25
Includes financial metrics for AM and AMGP, and geographic asset maps with infrastructure legends.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Not explicitly mentioned but implied in various sections
26
The diagram uses a tree-like structure to show how various business pillars (left and right) support the core 'Low Cost Liquids-Rich Resource Base', ultimately present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Not explicitly mentioned but implied in various sections
28
The chart uses a dual-axis approach to show volume (bars) and price (lines) over time.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
29
The chart demonstrates how various cost layers reduce the initial 111% ROR to a 37% full cycle ROR, which remains well above the 8% WACC.show_valuation_bridge
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
30
The chart highlights that there are no debt maturities until 2021 and that new credit facilities have extended the average maturity to 2022.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
31
The chart uses a step-line format to represent discrete credit rating changes over time.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
32
The slide uses a callout box to emphasize the percentage reduction in costs over the period.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
33
Includes specific financial assumptions for Marcellus and Utica plays.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
34
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
35
Standard financial disclosure slide for non-GAAP metrics.other
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
36
Includes footnotes regarding definitions and pricing assumptions.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
37
The slide explains the exclusion of full GAAP reconciliation due to the impracticality of forecasting specific volatile items.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
38
The slide explains why a full GAAP reconciliation is not provided and lists specific line items for 2018 forecasts.appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
39
Standard financial disclosure slide for EBITDAX reconciliation.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
40
The slide contains two distinct tables: one for per-unit metrics ($/Mcfe) and one for absolute dollar values ($ Millions).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
41
Standard financial disclosure slide for non-GAAP metrics.analyze_data