Baird | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 10 slides

Baird · 2018-08
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

10
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
Baird branding present.front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
02
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
03
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain
04
The slide uses a line chart to show historical trends and a table to calculate the 'All-in Exchange' ratio for two specific proposals.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain
05
The chart shows the bridge from 1.59x to 1.73x through various financial adjustments.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain
06
The chart shows the bridge from 1.55x to 1.68x, with a reference line for the current AMGP offer of 1.773x.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain
07
The slide compares current exchange ratio vs fully-diluted exchange ratio based on unanticipated AMGP shares.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain
08
The slide uses a thematic background image of oil pumpjacks.front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction
09
The slide compares 'Status Quo' vs '1.773x XR (incl. $3.00 cash)' across four key financial metrics.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction
10
Includes accretion/dilution analysis for cash flow from midstream ownership.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction