DraftKings | Results Presentation Deck | 23 slides

DraftKings · 2024-02
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 3 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

23
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Setup
02
other
Open slide detailBeat · Setup
03
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Setup
04
The slide uses a bridge-style layout to explain the variance between guidance and actuals.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Before After
05
The slide uses a split-chart layout to compare OSB and iGaming performance metrics.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Before After
06
Uses a bridge format to explain the delta between two guidance points.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Before After
07
Uses a broken axis to represent the jump in revenue values.quantify_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
08
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
09
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
10
The chart uses a broken x-axis to represent non-linear time intervals.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
11
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast internal drivers with external market results.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
12
Includes a broken axis symbol between FY 2020 and FY 2023.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
13
Uses a Venn diagram to represent customer overlap between OSB, iGaming, and Lottery products.quantify_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence
14
The slide uses a waterfall-style bridge to visually represent the efficiency gap between the two companies' customer acquisition costs.quantify_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · 2x2 Matrix
15
The chart uses a break in the x-axis to separate 2026 and 2028 projections.quantify_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence
16
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
17
analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
18
Standard financial disclaimer slide.other
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
19
The table uses lettered footnotes (a-f) to categorize adjustments like stock-based compensation and amortization.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
20
Includes detailed footnotes explaining specific line item adjustments.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
21
The chart shows the bridge from a GAAP loss of ($0.10) to an adjusted EPS of $0.29 through three primary adjustments.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
22
Includes Treasury Stock Method (TSM) calculations and warrant adjustments.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
23
Includes definitions for MUPs and ARPMUP.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution