ATAI | Investor Presentation Deck | 34 slides

atai Life Sciences · 2024-01
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

34
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
Includes company logo, mission statement, and date.front_matter
02
Page number 02 in top right corner.other
03
Slide 03 of the deck.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction
04
The slide uses a Gantt-style visualization to show drug development progress across Preclinical, Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 stages.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction
05
The slide uses a table-like structure to track progress (checkmarks for completed, squares for upcoming) across 8 distinct drug programs.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
06
The slide uses a blue-tinted portrait to evoke a clinical or therapeutic context.transition
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
07
Includes two line charts showing PK and PD profiles across different dosage levels.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
08
The slide outlines a 12-week open-label study with a specific focus on treatment-resistant depression (TRD).plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
09
The slide uses a timeline-based process diagram to illustrate the clinical trial flow.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
10
The slide features a stylized portrait of a person, likely a patient or representative, within a circular frame.transition
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
Includes a map of global disease burden and key product features.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
The slide cites a third-party study (Palhano-Fontes et al.) as proxy evidence for DMT efficacy.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
13
The slide uses a process flow diagram to show the progression of the trial parts.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
14
The slide uses a minimalist design with a focus on the product name and target indications, accompanied by a human-centric image.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
15
The slide uses a line chart to show the change in MADRS scores over 12 weeks for three different dosages.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
16
The slide outlines two distinct study designs (COMP 005 and COMP 006) with specific primary endpoints at week 6.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
17
The slide uses a minimalist design with a portrait image to signal a shift in topic to a specific therapeutic asset.transition
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
18
The chart illustrates the pharmacokinetic advantage of IV delivery over oral administration.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
19
Includes trial objectives and timeline markers for both parts.plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
20
transition
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
21
Includes a map of the world as a visual anchor for global disease burden.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
22
The slide uses a line chart to show longitudinal changes in HCQ-29 subscales across three time points (Pre-dose, Discharge, 1 Month).show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
23
The slide outlines a clinical trial cohort structure and key safety/efficacy outcomes.show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
24
The slide uses a feature-comparison matrix to highlight the unique value proposition of DMX-1002.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
25
transition
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
26
present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
27
The slide demonstrates an inverted U-shaped dose response curve.show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
28
The slide uses a grouped bar chart to visualize T-scores across three cognitive tests (HVLT, Symbol Coding, Category Fluency) for four dosage cohorts.show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
29
The slide uses a standard clinical trial flow diagram showing randomization into three arms (40mg, 20mg, placebo) over a 6-week period.plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
30
transition
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
31
Includes a map of global disease burden and key product features.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
32
Slide 32 of the deck.show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
33
The slide uses EEG power spectral density analysis to demonstrate target engagement and potential for a superior safety profile (less sedation) compared to stanshow_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
34
Includes company logo and Nasdaq ticker symbol.front_matter
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction