Unilever · conference-presentation
Unilever | Results Presentation Deck | 48 slides
48 pages · 0 arc beats · 0 loops
Unilever | Results Presentation Deck | 48 slides
Unilever · 2023-10 arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 0 LOOPS
124681012141618202224262830323436384042444648
Deck intelligence map
1 coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 48 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Whole deck 48 slides 100% 48/48 slides 100% 48/48 slides · 222 hits — 0/48 slides
56.3% 27/48 slides · 32 hits 50% 24/48 slides — 0/48 slides
— 0/48 slides
Slide inventory
48 every slide · same image gating as the playbook
06
The slide presents a dashboard of key performance indicators including Q3 and YTD growth metrics, price/volume trends, and competitiveness percentage.summarize
07
The chart shows a waterfall-style decomposition of USG into UPG (positive) and UVG (negative) components over five quarters.analyze_data
08
The chart displays a breakdown of Underlying Sales Growth (USG) into Underlying Volume Growth (UVG) and Underlying Price Growth (UPG).analyze_data
10
The chart displays a combination of bar and line elements representing Underlying Sales Growth (USG), Underlying Volume Growth (UVG), and Underlying Price Growtanalyze_data
11
USG = Underlying Sales Growth, UVG = Underlying Volume Growth, UPG = Underlying Price Growth.analyze_data
12
The chart displays a combination of stacked bars (UPG/UVG) and a line graph (USG).analyze_data
13
Charts display UPG (Underlying Price Growth) and UVG (Underlying Volume Growth) as stacked bars, with USG (Underlying Sales Growth) as a line overlay.analyze_data
14
The chart uses a waterfall-bridge structure to explain the change in turnover.analyze_data
19
The slide uses a central donut chart as a visual anchor for the six key pillars of the business.summarize
20
The slide uses a 'problem statement' framing to justify a need for change by highlighting negative trends in key business KPIs.diagnose_problem
21
The chart uses a visual metaphor of a 'gap' between current performance and the 'top third' ambition.expose_gap
22
Uses a side-by-side comparison framework to bridge current state and future needs.diagnose_problem
23
The slide uses a blue sidebar for navigation items and a large product image on the right.transition
24
The slide uses a circular diagram to represent the three pillars of the action plan.plan_implementation
25
The slide uses a circular diagram to represent the interconnected nature of the company's strategic pillars.summarize
26
The slide uses a 5x6 grid of brand logos to illustrate the portfolio concentration.prioritize
27
The slide uses a 'before-after' style transition to show how the company is evolving its strategy from simple product superiority to a multi-dimensional accelerpresent_framework
28
Uses a central comparison diagram to show the expansion of the marketing mix (4Ps + Proposition) from Turkey to UK.present_solution
29
Uses a 4Ps marketing mix framework (Product, Proposition, Packaging, Place, Promotion, Pricing) to show improvement.illustrate_case
30
Uses a before-after framing to contrast current state (too many projects) with future state (fewer, bigger projects).present_solution
31
The slide uses a grid layout to map specific technological innovations to business units and associated brands.present_solution
32
The slide uses a blue overlay box to highlight 'e.g. Biotechnology' as a specific example of the broader strategy.present_solution
33
The slide highlights specific product examples (Dove, Lifebuoy, Clear) under the 'Microbiome' technology umbrella.present_solution
34
The slide uses a 'before-after' visual structure with an arrow indicating a shift in strategy from declining/flat investment to accelerated growth.present_solution
35
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to categorize brand acquisitions by performance (Above, In-line, Below) and time period (2015-18, 2019 onwards).analyze_data
36
The slide uses a side-by-side comparison structure to link strategic criteria with execution tactics.present_framework
37
The slide uses a circular diagram to represent interconnected strategic pillars.present_framework
38
The chart shows a decline in gross margin followed by a recent uptick, supported by a list of operational and strategic levers.propose_solution
39
The slide uses a 'Today vs. Future' framing to show strategic focus.present_framework
40
The slide uses a stacked hexagon visual to represent a hierarchy of brand strategy components.present_framework
41
The slide illustrates the 'Focus of Five' business groups and their associated brands, alongside a list of strategic actions.plan_implementation
42
The diagram is a three-part circular flow, often used to represent a flywheel or interconnected strategic pillars.present_framework
43
Includes a legend for new appointments; one role is currently vacant.introduce_nominees
47
The central diagram uses a circular flow/process motif to group 10 strategic actions.present_solution