BioAtla | Investor Presentation Deck | 44 slides

BioAtla · 2023-05
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

44
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
03
The slide uses a linked-circle diagram to represent the company's core pillars.summarize
04
other
Open slide detailBeat · Team
05
other
Open slide detailBeat · Team
06
The slide uses a visual comparison between healthy cells (alkaline) and cancer cells (acidic) to demonstrate the selective binding mechanism.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
07
The slide uses a three-column layout to categorize the platform's versatility.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
08
The slide uses a Gantt-style visualization to represent clinical trial phases for multiple drug candidates.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · Roadmap
09
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Roadmap
10
The slide uses a structured list format to define the target market and unmet medical need.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Market Sizing
11
Includes a waterfall plot for partial response and a spider plot for longitudinal tumor change.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Market SizingLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
Includes a spider plot for target lesion change and a Kaplan-Meier survival curve with a summary table.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Market SizingLoop · Cost Of Inaction
13
Includes specific clinical trial design details (dosing regimens, patient counts, endpoints).show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Market SizingLoop · Cost Of Inaction
14
The slide uses a decision tree/process flow to map patient cohorts to clinical outcomes and subsequent trial progression.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Market SizingLoop · Cost Of Inaction
15
Includes specific clinical trial data (N=73 and N=26) and detailed breakdown of specific adverse events like constipation, neuropathy, and diarrhea.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Market SizingLoop · Cost Of Inaction
16
Includes detailed footnotes for data sources and medical abbreviations.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Market SizingLoop · Cost Of Inaction
17
The chart is a classic waterfall plot used in oncology to show tumor shrinkage/growth.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
18
The slide uses a process-oriented layout to describe clinical trial progression.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
19
The chart highlights two specific cohorts (40% and 44% ORR) within a red box to emphasize efficacy in PD-1 failure populations.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
20
Includes waterfall plot (left) and spider plot (right) for patient response data.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
21
Includes specific clinical trial safety metrics and footnotes regarding data definitions.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
22
NSQ = nonsquamoussummarize
23
The table details specific drug administration schedules (mg/kg) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for different cycle lengths.plan_implementation
24
Includes abbreviations for LMS, UPS, and NSCLC at the bottom.analyze_data
25
transition
26
The slide uses a grid of metrics to establish the total addressable market and the specific sub-segment (2L+ ROR2+ patients) targeted by the company.size_opportunity
27
The chart displays 'Maximum % Change from Baseline in Sum of Target Lesions'.show_traction
28
Uses a 2x2 grid layout to present key epidemiological and clinical data points.size_opportunity
29
The chart is a 'spider plot' or 'swimmer plot' variant showing % change in target lesions over time for two specific patients.show_traction
30
The slide uses a structured layout to define the patient funnel and clinical need.size_opportunity
31
The slide presents clinical data points (PR/CR rates) to justify moving to Phase 2.show_traction
32
The slide uses a side-by-side comparison layout to detail patient cohorts and treatment regimens for different indications.plan_implementation
33
The table details specific drug administration schedules (mg/kg) for different cycle lengths and days.analyze_data
34
The table lists specific indications (NSCLC, Melanoma, Head and Neck, Ovarian) and their corresponding dosing schedules (Q2W, 3Q4W) and patient counts (N ~ 20 oanalyze_data
35
transition
36
The slide uses a combination of a summary table for clinical data and a dot plot for NHP toxicity data.compare_peers
37
The slide uses a timeline-based process diagram to show dose escalation and RP2D selection.plan_implementation
38
transition
39
The slide uses a before-after framing (problem vs solution) and presents preclinical data (tumor shrinkage and toxicity studies).present_solution
40
Includes specific dose levels (DL) and priming dose levels (PDL) for the trial.plan_implementation
41
The slide uses a table structure to represent a timeline of events.plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
42
The slide uses a linked-circle diagram to represent the company's core pillars.summarize
44
The chart illustrates the trade-offs between dosing frequency and concentration levels for an antibody-drug conjugate.analyze_data