Compass Therapeutics | Investor Presentation Deck | 40 slides

Compass Therapeutics · 2023-02
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

40
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
Features a molecular visualization with a target reticle.front_matter
03
The slide uses a ribbon-style list format to categorize key company information.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction
04
The chart uses a horizontal bar format to represent the development stage of various drug candidates.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction
05
The slide uses a grid layout to display headshots, names, titles, and a collection of logos representing past or associated company experience.other
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction
06
The slide features a compass-like icon, suggesting a navigational or strategic focus for the upcoming section.transition
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
07
The slide illustrates the mechanism of action of a bispecific antibody targeting DLL4 and VEGF-A.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
08
inspire_vision
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
09
MTD = Maximum Tolerated Dose; PR = Partial Response; RECIST = Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; ORR = Objective Response Rate.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
10
The chart displays tumor growth percentages for individual patients, categorized by cancer type (Gastric, CRC, Other) and labeled with dosage (mpk).show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
The table highlights Partial Response (PR) rates with a red border.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
The chart highlights a subset of patients with significant tumor reduction (boxed area).show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
13
Includes footnotes regarding clinical trial context for hypertension and cytopenia.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
14
The slide presents clinical efficacy data comparing monotherapy vs combination therapy across two metrics.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
15
The slide illustrates a standard Simon 2-Stage design, a common statistical framework for Phase II oncology trials.present_framework
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
16
The table highlights patient age, gender, ECOG status, prior therapies, and cancer subtypes.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
17
This is a standard oncology 'swimmer's plot' or 'waterfall plot' used to demonstrate clinical efficacy.show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
18
Standard clinical trial swimmer plot visualization.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
19
Includes patient enrollment status and breakdown of ORR by prior lines of therapy.show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
20
Standard clinical trial survival analysis charts (Kaplan-Meier) with 'Number at risk' tables below.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
21
The slide compares clinical trial data for a specific combination therapy against historical label data for individual components.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
22
The table compares a small sample size (N=24) against much larger historical cohorts.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
23
The slide uses a side-by-side comparison to highlight the superior ORR, PFS, and OS of CTX-009 compared to historical benchmarks like FOLFOX and TOPAZ-1.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
24
The slide outlines a 2:1 randomized clinical trial structure for a drug combination (CTX-009 + Paclitaxel) versus a control (Paclitaxel).plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
25
The slide uses a table for market sizing and a structured layout to contrast 1L and 2L treatment options.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Market SizeLoop · Cost Of Inaction
26
The slide depicts a standard Simon 2-stage design, a common statistical framework in oncology clinical trials.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Market SizeLoop · Cost Of Inaction
27
The slide provides epidemiological data alongside a clinical treatment landscape overview.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Market SizeLoop · Cost Of Inaction
28
The slide uses a three-column layout to represent sequential or parallel development tracks.plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
29
transition
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
30
Includes a molecular visualization showing the binding site of CTX-471 compared to other antibodies.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
31
The slide uses a before-and-after visual comparison of CT scans to demonstrate drug efficacy.show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
32
plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
33
transition
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
34
The slide uses a process flow diagram to show the transition from testing bispecific formats to the identification of the lead candidate CTX-8371.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
35
The slide uses a visual comparison framework to contrast standard therapy (left) with the company's proprietary mechanism (right).present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
36
The slide shows tumor volume reduction over time, percentage tumor growth inhibition, and individual tumor response curves, highlighting CTX-8371's efficacy.show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
37
The slide outlines the current progress and future clinical trial design for a drug candidate.plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
38
front_matter
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
39
The slide uses a list-based structure to summarize drug development progress across three distinct assets.summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
40
The timeline uses blue and red color coding for different drug programs or status types.plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction