TCR2 Therapeutics | Results Presentation Deck | 34 slides

TCR2 Therapeutics · 2022-09
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

34
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
Exhibit 99.2 identifier present.front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
02
other
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
03
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
04
Includes a list of abbreviations at the bottom.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
05
The slide uses a visual comparison framework to position TRuC-T cells as a superior technological evolution.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction
06
The slide uses a 2x2 layout to present four distinct experimental results supporting the superiority of TRuC technology.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction
07
The slide uses a comparative structure to frame gavo-cel as a superior therapeutic option compared to historical anti-mesothelin CAR-T approaches.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction
08
The chart is a classic waterfall plot used in oncology clinical trials to demonstrate efficacy.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Jobs To Be Done
09
Waterfall plot showing individual patient responses; includes specific clinical trial metrics (ORR, PFS, OS).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Jobs To Be Done
10
Includes longitudinal CT scan imagery and a line chart tracking tumor diameter and volume reduction.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Jobs To Be Done
11
Waterfall plot shows individual patient responses; ORR, PFS, and OS metrics provided.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Jobs To Be Done
12
The slide uses a central human anatomy diagram to map specific cancer types to their respective mesothelin expression rates.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Jobs To Be Done
13
The slide uses a vertical process flow to link four strategic modifications to two distinct patient groups (Ovarian/Mesothelioma and NSCLC/Cholangiocarcinoma).plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Jobs To Be Done
14
transition
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Jobs To Be Done
15
The slide uses a process diagram to illustrate the dose escalation cohorts leading to the Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D).present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Jobs To Be Done
16
RP2D (Recommended Phase 2 Dose) is highlighted at DL 3.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Jobs To Be Done
17
The table categorizes adverse events into Hematologic, On Target/On Tumor, On Target/Off Tumor, and Other, with a specific highlight on the RP2D (Recommended Phanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Jobs To Be Done
18
Waterfall plot is a standard clinical trial visualization for tumor response.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Jobs To Be Done
19
The chart uses a swimmer plot format to track longitudinal patient data including lymphodepletion status, response type, and survival.analyze_data
20
The slide presents Kaplan-Meier curves for Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival alongside a comparative table of historical study data.compare_peers
21
Includes waterfall plot of target lesion changes and Kaplan-Meier plots for PFS and OS.analyze_data
22
Includes longitudinal CT scan imagery and a line chart tracking tumor diameter and volume reduction over time.illustrate_case
23
The slide uses a scatter plot format with a shared legend for patient IDs and dose levels.analyze_data
24
Data shows patient-specific longitudinal tracking of transgene copies/µg gDNA.analyze_data
25
Patients with baseline levels of SMRP in normal range were excluded. Data cutoff: September 9, 2022.analyze_data
26
transition
27
The chart displays individual patient responses, with multiple patients achieving significant tumor regression.analyze_data
28
The slide uses a numbered list format to categorize clinical trial improvements.present_solution
29
Includes a futility analysis note for MPM arms and collaboration branding.present_framework
30
The chart shows the breakdown of patient eligibility by MSLN expression levels (50%, 2+/3+ vs 50%, 1+ vs Not eligible).analyze_data
31
The chart is a swimmer plot showing patient response over time, including redosing events and disease progression.summarize
32
Uses multiparameter immunofluorescence to visualize tumor markers (PanCK), T cells (CD3), TAMs (CD68), and inhibitory ligands (CD155, PD-L1).diagnose_problem
33
The chart uses horizontal bars to represent the development stage of each program.plan_implementation
34
The slide features a large stylized '2' from the company logo as a background element.state_next_steps