Equillium | Results Presentation Deck | 32 slides

Equillium · 2022-09
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

32
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
Exhibit 99.1 indicates this is likely a regulatory or investor relations filing.front_matter
04
transition
05
The slide uses a list-based layout to present key metrics with corresponding descriptions.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · KPI Overview
06
The slide includes the KDIGO 2012 CKD prognosis matrix.present_framework
07
The slide uses a process-oriented diagram to visualize clinical milestones.present_framework
08
Data sourced from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership (AMP) Lupus Network.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Key Takeaways
09
The slide uses stacked bar charts to compare response rates (Complete, Partial, No Response) at different time intervals for two drugs.diagnose_problem
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction
10
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
Includes scientific citation at the bottom.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
The slide uses a 'Bench to Bedside' narrative structure to present scientific evidence.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
13
The slide uses a visual process flow to explain the mechanism of action.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
14
transition
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
15
The slide outlines a clinical trial structure with 5 cohorts ranging from 0.4 to 3.2 mg/kg.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
16
Includes clinical trial abbreviations and source citation in footer.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
17
The slide appears to be a template or placeholder with only the title present.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
18
The slide compares clinical trial data for two different drugs using different metrics (fold change vs median % reduction).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
19
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
20
transition
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
21
The slide outlines a clinical trial protocol for Itolizumab in patients with active proliferative lupus nephritis (apLN).present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
22
Data includes age, gender, race, country, disease duration, treatment history, LN class, and renal function metrics.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
23
Data cut-off date: September 2, 2022.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
24
The slide uses a structured table-like layout to categorize safety findings.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
25
The chart shows concentration over time for different dosage groups (0.4 to 3.2 mg/kg) for Type A and Type B subjects.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
26
The chart uses stacked bars to visualize the breakdown of Complete Response (two categories), Partial Response, and No Response.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
27
The chart tracks subject progress over time (weeks) with markers for treatment milestones and clinical responses.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
28
The chart uses a waterfall-style visualization to show individual subject outcomes relative to a 50% reduction threshold.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
29
The chart includes error bars representing standard error (SE) and sample sizes (n) at each time point.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
30
The table compares interim analysis data for Itolizumab against historical AMP SoC data across 3, 6, and 12-month intervals.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
31
Slide 31 of a presentation deck.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
32
state_next_steps