Exscientia | Investor Presentation Deck | 37 slides

Exscientia · 2022-06
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

37
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
03
The slide uses a three-column layout to summarize core business pillars.summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Golden Circle
04
show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Golden Circle
05
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to map partnership stages against specific partners.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Golden Circle
06
The slide uses a matrix layout to demonstrate partnership depth and breadth across the R&D pipeline.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Golden Circle
07
The slide highlights a major partnership deal as evidence of market traction and validation of the platform.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Golden Circle
08
The slide highlights the balance between tech and science talent, supported by high-level academic and research metrics.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Golden Circle
09
The chart illustrates a shift in the drug development lifecycle curve, emphasizing efficiency gains.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Golden Circle
10
The slide uses a combination of stacked bar charts and a grouped bar chart to demonstrate efficiency gains.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Golden Circle
11
The slide uses a histogram to visualize probability distributions of rNPV outcomes under different scenarios, alongside a table quantifying the impact of specifanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Golden Circle
12
The chart uses a horizontal bar-like structure to represent individual programs progressing through discovery and enabling phases.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Golden Circle
13
The slide uses a pipeline/funnel-like structure to categorize projects by development stage and therapeutic area.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Golden Circle
14
Uses a three-pillar visual structure to explain the AI-driven drug discovery approach.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Golden Circle
15
The diagram uses a circular, iterative flow (flywheel-like) to represent the 'learning process' of the AI architecture.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Golden Circle
16
The slide uses a horizontal process-like layout to showcase four distinct technical pillars.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Golden Circle
17
show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Golden Circle
18
transition
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Golden Circle
19
The slide uses a circular process diagram to illustrate the integration of different data sources and AI techniques.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Golden Circle
20
The slide uses a circular process flow to represent the R&D pipeline.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Golden Circle
21
The slide uses a process flow to illustrate a medical case study, highlighting the efficacy of a drug screening platform.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Golden Circle
22
Includes Kaplan-Meier survival curves and a decision tree diagram illustrating clinical benefit.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Golden Circle
23
The slide features a hierarchical clustering heatmap (dendrograms on top and left) with a specific cluster highlighted in yellow.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Golden Circle
24
The slide uses a small multiples approach to show dose-response curves across different patient samples and time points, highlighting a clear stratification.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction
25
The slide uses a three-part process flow: Target Product Profile (table), MPO (code snippet), and Merit (scatter plot).present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
26
The diagram uses a hub-and-spoke style flow to represent data integration and generative design.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
27
The slide is minimalist, focusing entirely on the visual demonstration of the product/technology.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
28
The slide uses a scatter plot to demonstrate the 'active learning' selection process, highlighting that the AI selects points (compounds) that are not necessaripresent_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
29
transition
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
30
Includes a biological pathway diagram and a honeycomb diagram for indications.size_opportunity
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
31
present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
32
The slide uses a color-coded heatmap (green/yellow/red) to highlight performance against criteria.frame_problem
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
33
The table uses a color-coded system (green/yellow/red) to indicate performance against criteria.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
34
The slide compares tumor growth inhibition across two cancer types using different dosages of EXS617.show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
35
The slide uses a multi-panel line chart layout to compare drug efficacy and toxicity across different time points and cell types.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
36
The slide uses small multiples to show dose-response curves for individual patient samples, then aggregates them into two groups (I and II) to demonstrate diffeanalyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Golden Circle
37
other
Open slide detailLoop · Golden Circle