Spirit · conference-presentation
Spirit | Mergers and Acquisitions Presentation Deck | 43 slides
43 pages · 4 arc beats · 3 loops
Spirit | Mergers and Acquisitions Presentation Deck | 43 slides
Spirit · 2022-05 arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 3 LOOPS
12468101214161820222426283032343638404243
Deck intelligence map
4 coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 43 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Setup 4 slides 100% 4/4 slides 100% 4/4 slides · 14 hits — 0/4 slides
50% 2/4 slides 25% 1/4 slides 100% 4/4 slides — 0/4 slides
Complication 10 slides 100% 10/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides · 46 hits — 0/10 slides
10% 1/10 slides 90% 9/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides Evidence 10 slides 100% 10/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides · 44 hits — 0/10 slides
— 0/10 slides
70% 7/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides Solution 19 slides 100% 19/19 slides 100% 19/19 slides · 91 hits — 0/19 slides
21.1% 4/19 slides · 5 hits 42.1% 8/19 slides · 9 hits 100% 19/19 slides 100% 19/19 slides Slide inventory
43 every slide · same image gating as the playbook
03
The slide uses a strong, confrontational headline to frame the narrative against a competitor's proposal.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Setup
04
Uses red 'X' icons for negative points and a yellow checkmark for the board's decision.preempt_rebuttal
Open slide detailBeat · Setup
05
The slide uses a Spirit Airlines tail fin as a visual anchor, likely part of a presentation arguing against the JetBlue-Spirit merger.frame_problem
06
Uses a 'Claim vs. Reality' structure to frame the argument.expose_contradiction
07
The slide uses a comparison table to frame the NEA as a 'de facto merger' that the DOJ is actively litigating against, creating a logical impossibility for the expose_contradiction
08
The slide uses a combination of bar charts to demonstrate market dominance and high revenue potential in the Northeast, specifically highlighting the importanceexpose_contradiction
09
Uses a decision tree to argue that all paths lead to a negative outcome for the target company's shareholders.preempt_rebuttal
10
The slide uses a rhetorical question in the blue callout box to challenge the regulatory viability of the merger.name_villain
11
The slide uses a 'callout' box to emphasize the negative impact on consumers, followed by a list of specific regulatory concerns.preempt_rebuttal
12
The chart uses a shaded area to represent the 'spread' between the offer price and the actual market price.preempt_rebuttal
13
Uses a 2x2-style matrix structure to contrast two potential M&A scenarios.compare_peers
14
The slide uses a Spirit Airlines plane tail as a visual anchor to frame the critique.name_villain
15
The slide uses a red dashed line to visually anchor the 'illusory' offer against historical stock performance.name_villain
16
Uses a combination of a line chart for stock performance and a bar chart for earnings recovery to argue for holding airline assets.quantify_opportunity
17
The slide uses a bar chart to show income recovery and a table to show valuation sensitivity, aiming to refute a competitor's claim.show_valuation_bridge
18
Uses a red dashed line to represent the 'JetBlue's Illusory Offer' benchmark.show_valuation_bridge
19
The slide uses a visual metaphor of a Spirit Airlines tail fin to introduce the subject of the acquisition.frame_problem
20
The slide uses a 'villain' framing to characterize JetBlue's strategic motives.expose_contradiction
21
The slide uses a direct quote from a regulatory filing to frame JetBlue's competitive concerns.expose_contradiction
22
The slide uses a 'preempt_rebuttal' structure to cast doubt on the sincerity of the tender offer.preempt_rebuttal
23
The slide uses a strong, provocative headline combined with a visual brand element to establish a narrative of conflict or resistance.frame_situation
24
Uses a combination of bar charts and testimonial quotes to build a case against the company's current management.expose_contradiction
25
The slide uses a 'before-after' style comparison of financial metrics to highlight value destruction.expose_contradiction
26
The slide uses a Spirit Airlines tail as a visual metaphor, likely to frame the upcoming content as a counter-narrative or competitive critique.transition
27
Uses a 'Fiction vs. Fact' structure to systematically debunk four specific points.expose_contradiction
28
Uses a 'The Fiction' vs 'The Fact' structure to systematically debunk competitor claims.expose_contradiction
29
The slide uses bold text to emphasize key findings and actions taken by the board.summarize
30
Uses a 'Summary of JetBlue's Propaganda' label to frame the content as a rebuttal.expose_contradiction
33
The slide uses a yellow callout box to emphasize the core message that a 'no' vote for Frontier is not a 'yes' for JetBlue.preempt_rebuttal
35
The slide uses a structured list format to present deal terms, synergies, and board process.summarize
36
The central graphic represents the merger of Spirit (S) and Frontier (F).summarize
37
The slide uses a clear benefit-driven structure to justify the merger to stakeholders.quantify_opportunity
38
Uses a waterfall-bridge chart to illustrate value components and a bar chart for valuation sensitivity.show_valuation_bridge
39
The slide uses a map to visualize network overlap and expansion potential.summarize
40
The chart uses a combination of bar heights and callout bubbles to compare revenue metrics. The combined entity is highlighted in blue, while individual Frontiecompare_peers
41
The slide uses a CAGR of 12% to illustrate fleet expansion.quantify_opportunity
43
This slide uses visual metaphor to represent a competitive comparison between two airlines.compare_peers