ValueAct Capital · activist-deck
ValueAct Capital | Activist Presentation Deck | 75 slides
75 pages · 0 arc beats · 0 loops
ValueAct Capital | Activist Presentation Deck | 75 slides
ValueAct Capital · 2022-02 arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 0 LOOPS
151015202530354045505560657075
Deck intelligence map
1 coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 75 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Whole deck 75 slides 100% 75/75 slides 100% 75/75 slides · 323 hits — 0/75 slides
16% 12/75 slides · 14 hits 68% 51/75 slides — 0/75 slides
— 0/75 slides
Slide inventory
75 every slide · same image gating as the playbook
08
The slide highlights a collaborative approach to stewardship, contrasting high engagement (board seats) with low adversarial activity (proxy contests).summarize
09
The slide uses a timeline to demonstrate a pattern of ignored shareholder feedback.expose_contradiction
10
This slide serves as a narrative bridge between private engagement and public escalation.frame_situation
11
The slide uses a callout box to pivot from the board's refusal to a direct call for shareholder action.expose_contradiction
13
The slide uses a logo-grid to visually demonstrate the 'unfocused' nature of the holding company.name_villain
14
The chart highlights the underperformance of Seven & i Holdings (red line) compared to peers like Couche-Tard and Casey's.compare_peers
16
The table highlights the concentration of profit in the convenience store segment, using color coding to distinguish core from non-core assets.analyze_data
17
Uses a bar chart to contrast the high ROIC of 7-Eleven against the negative ROIC of department/specialty stores and superstores.diagnose_problem
18
Uses a checkmark/cross comparison matrix to highlight strategic gaps.expose_contradiction
19
The slide uses a classic 'expose contradiction' structure by contrasting capital allocation with internal ROIC expectations.expose_contradiction
20
Uses a news article screenshot as evidence of competitive threat.expose_contradiction
21
Uses a news article screenshot as evidence of competitive pressure.preempt_rebuttal
22
Uses a screenshot of a news article as a 'cite_precedent' or 'evidence' to frame the competitive threat.preempt_rebuttal
25
The slide uses a chronological narrative to expose the contradiction between the company's private acknowledgement of ValueAct's ideas and their public denial oexpose_contradiction
26
Uses a binary choice framework to contrast current performance vs potential.compare_peers
28
The chart uses color coding to distinguish between conglomerates (grey) and focused retail/QSR peers (teal), with Seven & i Holdings highlighted in purple.compare_peers
29
The slide argues for a divestiture to unlock value and allow management focus on 7-Eleven.show_valuation_bridge
30
The chart uses a waterfall-style bridge to show how different segments contribute to the total EBITDA, highlighting the drag of non-food retail.propose_solution
31
Uses a visual transition (arrow) to show the transformation from a conglomerate to a focused entity.propose_solution
32
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to visualize the 14bn yen in synergies and a callout to explain why standalone scale is sufficient.propose_solution
33
Uses a bar chart to contrast group company performance against industry peers.compare_peers
34
The slide uses a peer benchmark to argue for operational improvements in the US 7-Eleven business.compare_peers
35
The chart uses bubble size to represent system sales; the regression line suggests 7-Eleven is an outlier in headcount efficiency.compare_peers
36
Uses a visual transition from a gas pump to food brands to illustrate the strategic pivot.propose_solution
37
The slide uses a 'White Space' framing to argue for international growth, contrasting the current 16 markets with the 80-100+ markets of competitors.size_opportunity
38
The chart uses a waterfall bridge to justify the valuation gap between the current MTMP and the proposed transformation plan.show_valuation_bridge
39
The chart bridges current share price to a potential future value through operational and strategic improvements.show_valuation_bridge
40
The chart uses a waterfall bridge to show how operational improvements, expansion, and divestitures contribute to ROIC growth.show_valuation_bridge
42
The slide uses a numbered list to present the two core demands for governance reform.summarize
43
Uses a timeline to highlight the contradiction between corporate ownership and blame deflection.expose_contradiction
44
Uses visual juxtaposition of gas station scale vs. EV charger targets to frame the company as lagging in the energy transition.expose_contradiction
45
Uses a quote from Financial Times to validate the critique of the Speedway acquisition.expose_contradiction
46
Uses a quote to frame the company's internal state as a 'mess' due to communication gaps.expose_contradiction
47
Uses screenshots of OpenWork reviews and a Diamond Online article to substantiate claims of internal strife.expose_contradiction
48
The chart uses a waterfall-style layout to show negative deviation from a baseline (0).name_villain
49
Uses an org chart to illustrate excessive complexity and a quote to provide academic backing for the 'diversification discount' thesis.expose_contradiction
50
Uses a traffic light system (green/yellow/red) to evaluate disclosure quality across different industries.diagnose_problem
51
Uses a comparative structure to show the failure of two specific partnerships.expose_contradiction
52
Uses a timeline to show the rapid failure of 7Pay and a pull-quote box to highlight the governance critique.expose_contradiction
53
Uses a stacked bar chart to visualize board composition and a checklist format for governance criteria.expose_contradiction
54
The table is partially obscured by a grey box, likely a redaction or layout artifact.expose_contradiction
55
The chart uses a binary 'Yes/No' classification for skill possession among directors.expose_gap
56
Uses a binary choice framework to contrast current vs proposed state.compare_peers
57
Uses a before-after-bridge framework to highlight the gap between current state and desired governance standards.expose_gap
58
The slide uses a 'before-after' framing to argue for organizational simplification.frame_problem
60
The slide uses a timeline to frame a narrative of management failure to act on repeated investor concerns.expose_contradiction
61
The slide uses a callout-style diagram to link specific survey flaws to the company's survey text.expose_contradiction
62
Uses METI guidelines as an authoritative precedent to critique board governance.cite_precedent
63
The slide uses a callout box to pivot from the board's refusal to a direct question about shareholder intervention.expose_contradiction
67
Includes a footnote indicating that some entries represent BOD observation rights.other
68
The slide contrasts high-volume collaborative metrics (104 investments, 53 seats) with low-volume adversarial metrics (6 letters, 1 contest) to frame the firm asummarize
69
The slide uses a 'toolbox' metaphor to categorize the activist's skill set.present_framework
71
The chart uses a waterfall bridge to show the impact of operational improvements, fresh food, international expansion, and organic growth.quantify_opportunity