Kalera | SPAC Presentation Deck | 50 slides

Kalera · 2022-02
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 3 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

6
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

50
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
03
transition
05
Includes a logo grid for Board & Advisor Experience.other
06
The slide uses a vertical timeline-style list to present five distinct value propositions.summarize
07
Uses a numbered list with a vertical timeline-style connector.summarize
08
Includes specific SPAC transaction details like cash in trust, exchange ratios, and equity rollover percentages.analyze_data
09
The slide features a background image of a vertical farming facility with a digital control monitor in the foreground.transition
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
10
The slide uses a grid-based layout to categorize product offerings.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
11
The slide uses a table to highlight specific nutrient increases, supported by a list of qualitative benefits on the left.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Competition
12
The slide uses a matrix structure to show how various proprietary technologies (columns) support different product lines (rows).present_framework
Open slide detailLoop · Aha Moment
13
The slide uses a combination of process diagrams, conceptual icons, and a bar chart to demonstrate technological superiority.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Aha Moment
14
The funnel diagram illustrates the conversion of invention disclosures into pending and granted patents across three core domains.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Aha Moment
15
The slide uses a three-row structure to define the business model: operations, product, and partners.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Business Model
16
The slide title says 10 facilities, but the table lists 11. Facility #11 is noted as a potential site.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Market SizeLoop · Why Now
17
The map uses a circular callout to emphasize the US footprint.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Market SizeLoop · Why Now
18
The chart compares actual performance (solid lines) against model projections (dashed lines) for two metrics: Production Capacity and Throughput Yield.show_traction
19
The slide uses a dual-component layout: a stacked bar chart for facility count and a timeline-based table for operational efficiency (ramp-up duration).show_traction
20
The slide uses a hierarchical layout to distinguish between primary growth vehicles and secondary models.present_framework
21
The slide uses a two-part structure to explain the operational advantages of their modular approach.present_solution
22
Includes footnotes for data sources and definitions.analyze_data
23
The slide uses a two-part framework to demonstrate competitive advantage in both cost (CapEx) and productivity (Yields).compare_peers
24
The slide uses a numbered list format to outline operational and financial levers for growth.summarize
25
The slide uses a grid layout to display 10 team members, each with their name, title, and a collection of company logos representing their professional backgrouother
26
Slide 5 of the deck, page 26 of the PDF.other
27
Uses a grid-based framework to align corporate strategy with ESG reporting standards.summarize
28
transition
29
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
30
The slide uses a dual-bar chart approach to compare 'Projections' (green) vs 'Run Rate' (purple) across three key financial metrics.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
31
The slide uses a structured grid to compare financial multiples across three distinct peer groups.compare_peers
32
Includes detailed footnotes explaining the calculation of share counts and equity values.analyze_data
33
The slide serves as a closing/transition slide for a Q&A session, displaying headshots and titles of the executive team.other
35
The slide highlights the strategic rationale for the Vindara acquisition, focusing on product differentiation and technological advantage.illustrate_case
36
The slide uses a linear process flow to map specific crop varieties to development stages.plan_implementation
37
The slide uses a numbered list format to highlight six key strategic advantages.summarize
38
The slide combines company overview with a specific project case study to demonstrate operational capability.illustrate_case
39
The slide outlines two proprietary growing technologies, Bestponics and Dryponics, and lists their operational benefits.present_solution
40
IVF likely refers to Indoor Vertical Farming in this context.summarize
42
The slide uses a dual-axis line chart to show the convergence of production capacity and throughput yield over a 10-month period.establish_context
43
The slide uses two line charts to demonstrate operational efficiency gains over time.show_traction
44
The chart illustrates a 43% reduction in ramp-up time for US farms over the period.show_traction
45
The chart uses two different Y-axes and a mix of solid and dashed lines to compare actual performance against the ramp-up model.show_traction
46
The chart uses a dual-axis approach to show both capacity utilization and yield efficiency simultaneously.show_traction
47
The chart uses dashed ellipses to highlight specific periods of operational inefficiency.analyze_data
48
Includes financial unit economics for the future state facility.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
49
The slide explains a strategic shift in infrastructure investment, moving away from a legacy site to a new, optimized facility.establish_context
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
50
The table shows the transition from GAAP Net Income to non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA by adding back D&A, Interest, and HQ Expenses.analyze_data