Polestar | SPAC Presentation Deck | 52 slides

Polestar · 2021-09
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

52
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
03
This is the second page of a two-part legal disclaimer section.other
04
The slide serves as a transition or media placeholder.filler
06
The slide uses a table to demonstrate historical performance of eight SPAC transactions.show_traction
07
transition
08
The slide combines a three-stage strategic narrative with a detailed chronological timeline.plan_implementation
09
The slide uses a central logo as a pivot point between two contrasting business archetypes.compare_peers
10
The slide uses a structured A-D layout to categorize business fundamentals.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
11
The slide uses a timeline arrow to indicate growth in volume and model count.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
12
The slide uses a triptych layout to detail exterior, rear, and interior design/tech features.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
13
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
14
The slide uses a numbered list format to present strategic advantages.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
15
Uses a simple CAGR calculation and a bottom-up market sizing approach.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Why Now
16
The slide uses a donut chart to show market share coverage and bar charts to show CAGR growth by segment and region.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Why Now
17
The slide uses a combination of a Gantt-style timeline for product launches and a line chart for volume growth.plan_implementation
18
The slide uses a funnel visualization to filter competitors based on criteria like EV share, pure-play status, and global reach.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Competition
19
The slide uses a mix of qualitative value propositions and quantitative environmental impact data.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Competition
20
Includes a competitive comparison of motor power (kW) against Polestar, Porsche, and Tesla.summarize
21
The slide uses a two-column layout for text and a row of images for product components.summarize
22
Uses a pyramid-like structure to illustrate the synergy between the two parent companies and the new entity.present_framework
23
The slide uses a table structure to compare seven different manufacturing sites.other
24
The slide uses a bar chart to demonstrate capital efficiency and a process diagram to illustrate governance.analyze_data
25
The slide uses a sequence of mobile app screenshots to illustrate the customer journey.present_solution
26
The slide outlines a direct sales business model strategy.plan_implementation
27
The slide uses a three-column layout to detail specific operational advantages.present_solution
28
The slide uses a table-like structure to show growth metrics across two time periods.plan_implementation
29
The slide uses bar charts to illustrate CAGR and margin projections.show_traction
30
Part of an 'Investment highlights' section.summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
31
The slide is part of an 'Investment highlights' section, focusing on the team's experience.other
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
32
transition
33
The chart tracks volume growth across four specific Polestar models, with an additional row of market share percentages below the x-axis.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
34
Includes margin and conversion metrics above bars; footnotes define non-GAAP metrics.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
35
The slide provides a detailed breakdown of Capex by type (PPE vs Intangibles) and total R&D cash spend.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
36
transition
37
Includes detailed footnotes regarding assumptions on cash, redemptions, and transaction expenses.analyze_data
38
The slide uses a checkmark/cross matrix to highlight competitive differentiation.compare_peers
39
The slide uses a bar chart to compare valuation multiples of the subject company against a peer group.compare_peers
40
The slide uses a mix of bar charts to compare financial performance metrics across four companies (Polestar, Tesla, Lucid, Xpeng, Nio).compare_peers
42
The table provides a multi-year financial forecast with growth metrics and cash flow analysis.analyze_data
43
Includes non-GAAP financial measure disclaimer and specific footnote regarding Payables Equitisation.analyze_data
44
The slide is structured as an appendix page with six distinct data-driven sections.analyze_data
45
The slide uses a grid-based framework to categorize sustainability ambitions.appendix
47
The slide uses a three-column layout for the main pillars and a bottom section for 'Upside'.appendix
48
Includes a testimonial/rating from CarMagazine.appendix
49
The slide uses a map to visually anchor the two R&D locations.appendix
50
Slide 50 of the deck.appendix
51
Standard legal disclosure slide for a SPAC merger pitch deck.appendix