Bigbear AI | SPAC Presentation Deck | 47 slides

BigBear.ai · 2021-09
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 3 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

47
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
04
other
Open slide detailBeat · Team
05
The slide uses a central logo and surrounding tech icons to convey a sense of global, data-centric capability.inspire_vision
06
The slide uses a structured list format to summarize key investment highlights.summarize
07
Uses a map-based visual to anchor specific case studies (Crimea, Libya, Iran/CENTCOM) to demonstrate platform capability.show_traction
08
The slide uses a 3x3 grid of key performance indicators to provide a quick overview of the company's health.summarize
09
The central diagram uses a hub-and-spoke style to connect the BigBear.ai brand to five key market drivers/problems.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Iceberg
10
Uses an arrow graphic to imply growth and progression across sectors.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Market SizeLoop · Iceberg
11
present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Iceberg
12
Includes a mix of hiring metrics, employee clearance levels, and a grid of corporate awards/logos.show_traction
13
The slide uses a variation of the OODA loop (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act), adapted here as Observe, Orient, Dominate.present_solution
14
The slide uses a variation of the OODA loop (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act) adapted to 'Observe, Orient, Dominate'.present_solution
15
Uses a side-by-side comparison framework to demonstrate technology transferability.present_solution
16
The slide highlights both qualitative benefits (real-time tracking, upsell path) and quantitative outcomes (labor savings, processing volume, prediction frequenillustrate_case
17
The slide uses a background image of a container ship to reinforce the maritime theme.illustrate_case
18
Uses a central positioning framework to contrast the company against two archetypal competitors.compare_peers
19
transition
20
Uses a visual arrow background to imply progression or growth.summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
21
The slide outlines a multi-pronged GTM approach involving strategic initiatives, a circular process for channel partners, and team headcount distribution.plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
22
show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
23
The slide uses a mix of bulleted objectives and quantitative market/ROI metrics.other
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
24
Includes a footnote regarding market research source.show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
25
The slide uses a timeline-like structure to show growth from 'Year 0' to 'Today'.show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
26
plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
27
transition
28
The slide uses a process-style table to highlight growth metrics.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
29
The slide uses a stacked bar chart for segment growth and a donut chart for 2025 market composition.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
30
The chart illustrates a shift in revenue mix towards higher-margin segments.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
31
Includes CAGR annotations and margin percentages for EBITDA.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
32
The slide provides a bridge between historical performance and future outlook, emphasizing contract backlog growth.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
33
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show revenue progression.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
34
The chart shows the progression from 2022E Backlog to 2022E Revenue via expected awards, commercial contracts, and weighted pipeline.analyze_data
35
transition
36
The slide uses a combination of logo-grid and a table of median financial metrics to justify the peer selection.compare_peers
37
The slide uses a dual-bar chart layout to compare two key financial metrics across 11 companies.compare_peers
38
The slide uses a bar chart format to compare Adj. EBITDA Margin and Rule of 40 metrics for BigBear.ai (highlighted in red) against various industry peers.compare_peers
39
The chart highlights the median valuation multiple of the peer group.compare_peers
40
The slide uses a bar chart comparison to illustrate valuation gaps.compare_peers
41
Includes a timeline of SPAC transactions and logos of associated companies.other
42
plan_implementation
43
Includes detailed footnotes regarding financial assumptions and debt treatment.analyze_data
44
state_next_steps
46
Includes segment-level breakdown for Cyber & Engineering and Analytics.analyze_data
47
state_next_steps