Babylon | Investor Presentation Deck | 42 slides

Babylon · 2021-09
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

42
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
03
inspire_vision
04
Slide presents the SPAC's core value pillars and the bios of the three key executives.other
05
Includes detailed footnotes regarding share counts, earnout structures, and valuation assumptions.analyze_data
06
The slide uses a mapping framework to validate an acquisition thesis.establish_context
07
The slide uses a curved arrow to imply growth over time, connecting historical milestones to a current state of US expansion.show_traction
08
The slide uses a grid layout to present 8 key executives with their titles, headshots, and notable career achievements.other
09
The slide uses a numbered list format to provide a comprehensive overview of the company's value proposition and operations.summarize
10
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
11
Uses a 'before-after' or 'problem-solution' framing where the two trends are presented with pros and cons, converging into the company's value proposition.argue_timing
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Why Now
12
The chart uses a 2x2 matrix layout to position competitors. The right side provides a qualitative comparison of two business model categories.compare_peers
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
13
transition
14
The slide uses a vertical axis to represent revenue intensity per life covered, mapping service tiers to increasing value.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
15
The slide uses a circular process flow for health engagement and a separate flow for clinical intervention, connected by a decision point.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
16
Uses a pyramid framework to illustrate service levels.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
17
Uses a step-chart visualization to contrast 'Babylon Costs' (teal) vs 'Traditional Healthcare Costs' (pink).present_solution
18
Includes a detailed architectural diagram of the technology stack and a list of academic/media citations.present_solution
19
The slide uses a brain diagram to illustrate AI capabilities and a table to benchmark performance against human doctors.present_solution
20
transition
21
The slide uses a grid layout to present 12 distinct quantitative metrics with supporting footnotes.show_traction
22
The slide uses a mathematical equation metaphor to illustrate the trade-offs in healthcare.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction
23
The slide uses a matrix structure to present quantitative evidence of operational success across diverse geographies.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction
24
The slide uses logos and app screenshots to establish credibility and scale.show_traction
25
The slide uses a standard ESG framework to categorize corporate responsibility efforts.summarize
26
transition
27
The slide uses a table-like structure to compare business models and their associated financial performance metrics.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Business Model
28
The chart illustrates the divergence between revenue growth and cost metrics, highlighting operational leverage.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Business Model
29
Includes a specific case study of the Higi acquisition.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Business Model
30
The slide uses donut charts to visualize revenue composition shifts over a two-year period.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Business Model
31
The table distinguishes between half-year (H1) and full-year (A/E) data points.analyze_data
32
The slide uses a bar chart comparison to highlight Babylon's high growth and valuation discount relative to peers.compare_peers
33
transition
34
Uses a before-and-after comparison framework to demonstrate growth.show_traction
35
show_traction
36
Uses a waterfall chart to bridge revenue from 2020 to 2022.analyze_data
37
Includes a before/after comparison of healthcare access and quantitative impact metrics.illustrate_case
38
The timeline shows a T+8 week implementation cycle.plan_implementation
39
The slide uses color-coded map pins to distinguish between clinical services (teal) and software licensing (grey).show_traction
40
The slide uses a quote from a peer-reviewed paper to establish credibility and clarify the range of savings (15-35%) versus a higher outlier figure (51%).cite_precedent
41
The slide uses a purple-tinted photo grid to create a warm, inclusive brand atmosphere.inspire_vision