Kinnevik | Results Presentation Deck | 12 slides

Kinnevik · 2021-02
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 0 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

1
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 12 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Whole deck 12 slides 100% 12/12 slides 100% 12/12 slides · 70 hits
0/12 slides
66.7% 8/12 slides · 10 hits 41.7% 5/12 slides
0/12 slides
0/12 slides

Slide inventory

12
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
02
front_matter
03
summarize
04
Uses a 'What We Said' vs 'What We Did' framework to demonstrate strategic alignment and execution.summarize
05
The slide uses a comparison structure to showcase two specific portfolio companies.illustrate_case
06
The slide uses a comparison table structure to validate investment decisions.illustrate_case
07
Includes founder headshots, app screenshots, and investment rationale.illustrate_case
08
The slide uses a three-column layout to compare three distinct companies with specific financial charts and bulleted performance summaries.analyze_data
09
The slide uses a 3x2 grid layout to present performance data for MatHem, Budbee, VillageMD, Kolonial.no, GFG, and Babylon.analyze_data
10
The chart uses a waterfall bridge to explain the change in NAV. It includes a secondary table at the bottom showing NAV per share.show_valuation_bridge
11
The slide uses two distinct waterfall charts to explain financial movement and current composition.analyze_data
12
The slide features a rocket launch background, likely symbolizing growth or ambition.front_matter