BioAtla | IPO Presentation Deck | 31 slides

BioAtla · 2020-12
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

31
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
The slide features a scientific illustration of antibody-cell interaction.front_matter
03
The slide provides specific financial and operational details regarding the company's public offering.other
04
Slide provides a snapshot of company metrics and key institutional investors.summarize
05
The slide uses a grid layout to present 8 key team members with their headshots, titles, and logos of past companies.other
Open slide detailBeat · Team
06
The slide uses a four-column layout to summarize key business drivers.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Team
07
The slide uses a Gantt-style visualization to show the progress of various drug candidates through clinical phases.plan_implementation
08
Includes a biological diagram of pH levels in human organs and a pHLIP intensity heatmap.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
09
Includes three distinct data visualizations: a pH-dependent binding curve, a pharmacokinetic exposure curve, and a toxicity (ALT) bar chart.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
10
The slide uses a three-part process flow to establish clinical validation followed by a data table for market sizing.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Market Size
11
The slide uses a logical flow from unmet need to regulatory advantage to commercial validation.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Market SizeLoop · Why Now
12
Includes specific clinical trial metrics and radiological evidence of efficacy.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Why Now
13
The slide uses a waterfall chart to demonstrate efficacy in a specific biomarker-positive patient.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Why Now
14
Includes clinical trial safety data and comparative toxicity analysis.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Why Now
15
Includes specific trial design details for Sarcoma and NSCLC, including interim analysis points and data read-outs.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Why Now
16
The slide uses a numbered list for the strategic rationale and a table for the market sizing data.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
17
Waterfall chart displays maximum percentage change from baseline in sum of target lesions across different patient cohorts.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
18
The slide uses a before-after comparison of clinical imaging to demonstrate drug efficacy.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
19
The table displays safety population data for N=3 and N=7 patients.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
20
Includes a synthetic arm for interim analysis and specifies patient criteria for NSCLC and melanoma.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
21
The slide uses a split-column layout to compare two drug candidates (BA3011 and BA3021) and a right-hand column for safety.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
22
The slide uses a comparison table to contrast monotherapy with combination therapy, highlighting the trade-off between improved survival and increased adverse eframe_problem
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction
23
The slide compares efficacy (tumor volume) and safety (GI symptoms) of BA3071 against standard I/O therapies.show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
24
The slide outlines a licensing deal structure and clinical progress.show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
25
The slide illustrates a bispecific antibody binding to a tumor cell and a T cell, with four key value propositions listed below.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
26
The slide uses a comparative framework to highlight the therapeutic index advantage of the CAB technology.show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
27
Uses red stars to denote specific data readouts or regulatory filings.plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
28
The slide emphasizes a 'patent minefield' strategy to protect products.other
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
29
Slide highlights financial backing to establish credibility.show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
30
summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
31
front_matter