Maersk | Investor Presentation Deck | 57 slides

Maersk · 2020-11
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

57
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
03
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
04
Includes Q3 and 9M 2020 financial metrics (Revenue, EBITDA, CFFO, FCF).summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
05
The slide includes a disclaimer regarding IFRS16 adjustments for 2016-2017 and definitions for LTM and FCF.analyze_data
06
The slide presents a comparison of Q3 and 9M performance for 2020 vs 2019, plus FY 2019 data.analyze_data
07
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
08
The chart uses a standard waterfall bridge to decompose the change in net profit.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · FinancialsLoop · Analogy
09
The slide uses a standard waterfall bridge to reconcile cash flow from operations to net cash flow.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · FinancialsLoop · Analogy
10
Includes a combo chart showing EBITDA (bars) and EBITDA margin (line) over time, plus a summary table of key financial metrics.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
11
The chart illustrates the drivers of EBITDA change, showing positive impacts from freight rates, bunker prices, and network costs, offset by volume declines andanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · FinancialsLoop · Before After
12
Slide 12 from Maersk Q3 2020 interim report.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · FinancialsLoop · Before After
13
The slide uses a split layout with a bulleted list on the left and a grid of key performance metrics on the right.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · FinancialsLoop · Before After
14
The chart shows a steady upward trend in market share from 24% in Jan 2020 to 53% in Oct 2020.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
15
Includes Q3 2020 interim report branding.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
16
The chart uses a dual-axis combination of bar (Gross Profit) and line (EBIT conversion ratio).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
17
The slide uses a dual-axis combo chart (bar for EBITDA, line for margin) and a summary table comparing Q3 2020/2019 and 9M 2020/2019.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
18
The slide uses a waterfall chart to explain the movement in EBITDA from Q3 2019 to Q3 2020.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
19
The chart uses a dual-axis approach with stacked bars for EBITDA components and a line for the LTM total.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
20
Includes a combo chart (bar for EBITDA, line for margin) and a summary table for Q3 and 9M periods.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
21
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
22
Includes CAPEX guidance and sensitivity table for freight rates, volume, bunker prices, and exchange rates.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
23
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
24
Financial highlights slide from Maersk Q3 2020 interim report.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
25
The slide contains two side-by-side tables: Income statement and Key figures and financials.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
26
The chart illustrates the components contributing to the change in NIBD, including EBITDA, working capital, capex, and leases.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
27
Part of the Q3 2020 interim report appendix.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
28
The slide uses two separate bar charts to show annual historical/guidance data and quarterly recent performance.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
29
Illustrates how ocean freight revenue is split across quarters based on the number of days spent in each quarter during a 56-day voyage.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
30
Data is in USD million.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
31
Includes definitions for liquidity reserve and subordination ratio in footnotes.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
32
Includes a break in the Y-axis for the 2015 data point.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
33
The slide uses a custom legend where colors represent performance strength (Very strong to Very weak) and arrows indicate inbound/outbound trade flows.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
34
The slide uses a geographic map to visualize market share percentages and relative rankings for various global trade lanes.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Market Size
35
The slide illustrates market concentration by mapping individual shipping companies to their alliance groups (2M, Ocean Alliance, The Alliance).compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Market Size
36
The slide tracks market share growth through three distinct waves of consolidation.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Market Size
37
The slide uses a combination of a bar-line chart for time-series data and donut charts for static capacity distribution.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Market Size
38
Data source: Alphaliner. Slide 38 of a Maersk presentation.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Market Size
39
Contains four line charts comparing 2018-2020 data.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Market Size
40
The slide uses a combination of donut charts for segmentation and a dual-axis line chart for time-series data.analyze_data
41
analyze_data
42
analyze_data
43
The slide provides operational performance metrics for Maersk, specifically comparing Headhaul vs Roundtrip utilisation and Dry vs Reefer container turns.analyze_data
44
The slide provides detailed definitions of cost categories in the footer note.analyze_data
45
The chart includes a data table below the bars showing total vessels, owned vessels, and chartered vessels.analyze_data
46
Data source: Alphaliner. Maersk Line is highlighted in light blue.analyze_data
47
Data source: Alphaliner. As at end-September 2020.analyze_data
48
The slide provides a visual overview of the geographic footprint of the Terminals and Towage business units.establish_context
49
Contains four distinct charts: a donut chart for throughput, a stacked bar for terminal count, a bar chart for concession length, and a combo chart for volume ganalyze_data
50
analyze_data
51
The chart uses a dual-axis approach where acquisitions are stacked above the timeline and divestments are listed below.analyze_data
52
The slide uses a line chart for historical cost trends and a donut chart for cost composition.analyze_data
53
The table distinguishes between consolidated businesses, JV & Associates, and implementations (terminals under construction).analyze_data
54
Includes a note clarifying that consolidated businesses include gateway terminals that are financially consolidated.analyze_data
55
The table shows zero or negative values for terminals under construction, indicating no operational throughput or revenue during the implementation phase.analyze_data
56
The chart tracks two metrics over 11 quarters, showing a consistent spread between revenue and cost.analyze_data
57
state_next_steps