Aeva | SPAC Presentation Deck | 36 slides

Aeva · 2020-11
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 3 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

36
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
Includes imagery of LiDAR sensor, test vehicle, and a small chip on a finger.front_matter
04
Includes logos of portfolio companies and professional bios for key personnel.other
05
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke layout with the company logo at the center.summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Golden Circle
06
summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Golden Circle
07
The slide showcases the multi-modal sensing output of Aeva's technology, highlighting its application across different hardware form factors.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Golden Circle
08
The slide uses a grid-like layout to present three primary co-founders followed by three key team members.other
Open slide detailLoop · Golden Circle
09
The slide uses a visual callout connecting a product image to a list of key value propositions.summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Golden Circle
10
The slide uses a color-coded matrix to demonstrate Aeva's competitive advantage in meeting all sensing requirements.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
The slide uses a two-row layout to contrast 'Automotive' vs 'Other Markets' with specific TAM growth figures.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
The slide uses a dual-track timeline (Business vs Technology) followed by a 'Today' summary section.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Market SizeLoop · Cost Of Inaction
13
The slide uses a composite image approach to contrast the physical hardware (chip on finger, module next to a quarter) with the resulting software output (LiDARpresent_solution
14
Uses a comparison frame to establish technical superiority.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
15
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke visual layout to connect the Aeva brand to its six core technological pillars.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
16
The slide uses a three-column layout to detail specific software performance metrics.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
17
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke layout to position the hardware at the center of four key technical capabilities.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Product
18
The slide uses a 2x2 grid layout to compare different sensor data modalities.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Product
19
The slide uses visual evidence of lidar point cloud processing to demonstrate technical capabilities.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Product
20
Uses a traffic-light system (green/yellow/red) to visualize performance against requirements.compare_peers
21
show_traction
22
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to categorize partners by industry and stage of engagement.show_traction
23
The slide uses a Gantt-style chart to show overlapping development and production phases for different product iterations (A, B, C, D).plan_implementation
24
The slide uses a color-coded system to link applications on the left to specific software modules on the right.present_solution
25
transition
26
Includes a bar chart for revenue projections and two pie charts for 2025 revenue segmentation.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · FinancialsLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
27
The slide highlights the transition to profitability and positive cash flow by 2024.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · FinancialsLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
28
The slide uses a combination of qualitative growth drivers and quantitative financial targets to justify the long-term valuation thesis.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · FinancialsLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
29
transition
30
Details the financial terms of the SPAC merger.analyze_data
31
Includes footnotes regarding transaction assumptions and capital structure.analyze_data
32
The slide uses a grouped bar chart approach to compare financial metrics across different technology sectors.compare_peers
33
The slide uses two bar charts to compare valuation multiples across different peer groups (Computing Platforms, Vision Based, Traditional LiDAR, Disruptive Autocompare_peers
34
The chart uses a bubble plot to visualize valuation multiples (y-axis) vs growth (x-axis) for peers in the autonomous vehicle and computing space.compare_peers
35
Uses a DCF-style methodology to discount future enterprise value back to current value for comparison.compare_peers
36
front_matter