Aeva | Investor Presentation Deck | 33 slides

Aeva · 2020-11
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

33
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
Includes imagery of LiDAR sensor on a vehicle, a chip on a finger, and various consumer electronics.front_matter
05
The slide uses a structured layout to present key executives and their credentials.other
Open slide detailBeat · Team
06
The slide showcases the multi-modal output of Aeva's sensor technology across various device form factors.present_solution
07
The slide uses a dual-track timeline (Business vs Technology) and a summary section for current status.show_traction
08
summarize
09
The slide uses a color-coded matrix to demonstrate competitive advantage.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
10
The slide uses a two-tier structure (Automotive vs Other Markets) to show growth from 2025E to 2030E.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
Uses a waterfall chart to bridge revenue components to a total of $880M.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Market SizeLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
Includes a visual size comparison of the chip against a US quarter coin.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Product
13
The slide uses a composite of real-world street imagery, a finger-held sensor chip, a quarter for scale, and a 4D LiDAR point cloud visualization.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Product
14
Uses a 'vs' comparison framework to contrast Aeva's continuous wave approach against pulsed legacy systems.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
15
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke visual metaphor to show how various proprietary technologies converge into a single chip.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
16
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke layout with the product at the center and four key features surrounding it.present_solution
17
Uses a traffic light system (green/yellow/red) to visualize performance against requirements.compare_peers
18
show_traction
19
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to map customer segments to specific partners and validation stages.show_traction
20
The slide uses a Gantt-style chart to visualize the overlap and sequence of product development and qualification stages.plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
21
The slide uses a color-coded dot system to map software modules to specific application sectors.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
22
transition
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
23
Includes a disclaimer about projected revenue and customer agreements.show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
24
Includes definitions of financial metrics in the footer.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
25
The slide uses a combination of qualitative growth drivers and quantitative financial targets to justify a long-term valuation thesis.size_opportunity
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
26
transition
27
Slide 27 of the deck.summarize
28
Includes detailed footnotes regarding transaction assumptions and share counts.analyze_data
29
The slide uses a custom bar chart layout to group peers by category (Computing Platforms, Vision Based, Traditional LiDAR, Disruptive Autotech) and compares thecompare_peers
30
The slide uses a grouped bar chart approach to compare valuation multiples across different peer groups (Computing Platforms, Vision Based, Traditional LiDAR, Dcompare_peers
31
The chart uses bubble size and color to categorize companies into Computing Platforms, Vision Based, Traditional LiDAR, and Disruptive Autotech.compare_peers
32
Uses a waterfall-style comparison to show valuation gaps.compare_peers
33
front_matter