Fusion Pharmaceuticals | IPO Presentation Deck | 49 slides

Fusion Pharmaceuticals · 2020-06
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

49
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
02
analyze_data
04
transition
05
The slide uses a grid layout to display five executives with their headshots, titles, and logos of past organizations.other
Open slide detailBeat · Team
06
The slide uses a bulleted list to highlight key competitive advantages and strategic positioning.summarize
07
The slide uses a three-stage process flow to illustrate the company's origin story and market positioning.plan_implementation
08
Uses a two-part visual comparison: physical properties vs. therapeutic mechanism.establish_context
09
The slide uses a process flow to explain the mechanism of action for Targeted Alpha Therapy (TAT).present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
10
The slide uses a process diagram to explain the therapeutic mechanism of Ac-225 based radiopharmaceuticals.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
11
Includes a biological process diagram and a line chart comparing excretion rates.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
12
The slide uses a funnel diagram to illustrate the R&D process from molecule leads to efficacy studies, followed by a process flow showing the impact of the linkpresent_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
13
The slide illustrates a process flow from the imaging analogue to the clinical outcomes of population enrichment and organ safety assessment.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
14
The slide uses a value-chain style flow to demonstrate operational maturity and competitive moat.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
15
The slide uses a standard pharmaceutical pipeline visualization format.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · Roadmap
16
The slide functions as a hybrid team bio and program introduction slide.other
Open slide detailBeat · Roadmap
17
Includes a PET scan image demonstrating targeted tumor uptake vs normal tissue.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Roadmap
18
Uses a funnel diagram to illustrate the R&D process steps.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Roadmap
19
The slide compares tumor volume growth curves (left) with histological H&E staining results (right) to demonstrate efficacy.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
20
The slide uses three distinct charts (two line graphs for different tumor types, one for large tumors) and a microscopy image to demonstrate therapeutic efficacshow_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
21
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
22
Includes headshot of James O'Leary, MD.transition
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
23
The slide uses a human body diagram to visually represent the systemic nature of the target.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction
24
Includes specific DLT observation period assumptions and context regarding COVID-19 trial interruptions.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
25
The slide uses medical imaging to validate the efficacy of the therapeutic agent in diverse solid tumor environments.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
26
The slide demonstrates the stability of the drug's targeting mechanism over time, which is critical for multi-dose therapeutic regimens.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
27
The slide uses a medical/scientific aesthetic with an atom-like graphic overlay.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
28
The chart shows individual patient data points grouped by organ and cohort, with a clear 'Limit' bar for each organ.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · TractionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
29
transition
30
The slide uses a dual-panel approach to illustrate two distinct mechanisms of action for combination therapy.present_solution
31
The slide uses a standard preclinical study design (process flow) followed by two line charts comparing treatment efficacy.show_traction
32
The slide uses a process diagram to explain the experimental design (re-challenge model) followed by a line chart showing tumor volume over time.show_traction
33
The slide demonstrates the mechanism of action for the therapeutic effect, specifically highlighting T cell memory.show_traction
34
The chart demonstrates synergistic efficacy in a tumor xenograft model.present_solution
35
plan_implementation
36
front_matter
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
37
The slide uses a three-column layout to categorize R&D and business development activities.plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
38
The slide uses a comparative structure (Rationale vs. Approach) to justify the development of a specific therapeutic candidate.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
39
transition
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
40
Includes footnotes explaining the Series B tranche structure and pro forma cash calculation.show_traction
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
41
The slide uses a table format to communicate project timelines.plan_implementation
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
42
summarize
43
summarize
44
state_next_steps
46
The slide lists specific patent numbers and filing dates for various programs including IGF-1R, linker platforms, and radioimmunoconjugates.other
47
The slide uses a table to contrast physical properties and a medical imaging sequence to demonstrate clinical efficacy.compare_peers
48
Includes inclusion criteria and specific dosimetry constraints.plan_implementation
49
Clinical trial safety data presentation.analyze_data